The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the integrated reporting journey: insights, gaps and agendas for future research
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify key challenges, opportunities, strengths and weaknesses experienced by the integrated reporting (IR) idea since the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC)’s Discussion Paper was published in late 2011. It provides insights into the phases of the IR journey as investigated by accounting researchers, identifies important gaps in the literature and sketches an agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach: The paper develops a theoretically informed analysis of published IR research articles using the idea journey theoretical framework. The paper draws upon academic analysis and insights published in 65 IR-related articles across 83 accounting journals listed in the Scopus database. Findings: A key insight of the paper is that the academic literature has not yet covered all stages of the IR idea journey. The highest proportion of articles provide insights in the generation and production phases of this journey, while there is relatively little research into the impact phase of the IR idea. Furthermore, the locus of research covered by the current IR literature is situated at macro- and meso-levels. This reveals opportunities for future research to explore, at a more detailed level, interactions between single individuals or small groups in implementing or understanding the IR idea. Research limitations/implications: This paper focuses on the idea journey of the IIRC’s version of IR. It identifies gaps regarding the stages of the IR idea journey that have not been covered by the extant academic literature and suggests some research areas that need to be addressed to help inform improvements in policy and practice. A key limitation is that it draws on a single communication channel, namely, academic articles published in accounting journals, but it provides opportunities for considerable further developments. Originality/value: The paper extends IR research by reconciling insights from an understandably fragmented emerging literature. It provides a multi-dimensional perspective on IR, highlighting the dynamics and interrelationships in the literature. It also helps inform improvements in research, policy and practice by identifying gaps regarding the stages of the IR idea journey that have not been covered by the extant academic literature. Lastly, the paper builds on the work of innovation and creativity scholars showing how the idea journey framework can be used to shape and add coherence to accounting research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,545
Morgan, G. (1986) · Cited by 5,650
The Sociology of Critical Capacity
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/136843199002003010 · Cited by 1,297
On Justification: Economies of Worth
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006) · Cited by 1,244
From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0462 · Cited by 1,121
Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research
de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-06-2014-1736 · Cited by 860
Self-citationOne Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy
Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010) · Cited by 804
Integrated reporting: A structured literature review
Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016) · Accounting Forum · doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.001 · Cited by 782
The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure
Flower, J. (2015) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.002 · Cited by 757
Cited by
True transparency or mere decoupling? The study of selective disclosure in sustainability reporting
Roszkowska-Menkes, M., Aluchna, M., & Kamiński, B. (2024) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102700 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Rinaldi, L., Unerman, J., & de Villiers, C.
- Venue
- Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-06-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1294-1318
- ISSN
- 0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2808023833
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 45.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the integrated reporting journey: insights, gaps and agendas for future research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/aaaj-04-2018-3446
- The paper
- Rinaldi, L., Unerman, J., & de Villiers, C. (2018). Evaluating the integrated reporting journey: insights, gaps and agendas for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-04-2018-3446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.