CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 181Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingAuditing, Earnings Management, GovernanceCorporate Governance and Financial Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices: The case of King III in South Africa

Ackers, Barry, Eccles, Neil Stuart·2015·Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
DOI 10.1108/aaaj-12-2013-1554
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: – Despite its voluntary nature, the Johannesburg stock exchange (JSE) requires all listed companies to apply the King III principles, including providing independent CSR assurance. King III has accordingly made independent CSR assurance a de facto mandatory requirement, albeit on an “apply or explain” basis. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR) assurance practices in South Africa, within a King III context. Design/methodology/approach: – To understand the impact of King III on South African CSR assurance practices, a longitudinal study covering reporting periods both before and after King III implementation. The first stage reviewed the annual reports of the 200 largest JSE-listed companies to establish the frequency of CSR assurance provision. The second stage involved performing a content analysis on the CSR assurance reports. Findings: – King III is driving the institutionalisation of CSR assurance practices in South Africa, as evidenced by the growth in CSR assurance since the implementation of King III. The study also found that the audit profession’s dominance was being eroded by specialist CSR assurors providing higher levels of assurance, despite concerns about the rigour of their assurance methodologies. Voluntary CSR assurance practices have resulted in the inconsistent application of CSR assurance practices, impairing the ability of stakeholders to understand the nature and scope of CSR assurance engagements. It is argued that this deficiency may be overcome through the imposition of a mandatory CSR assurance regime. Originality/value: – The pervasive impact of the King Code of Governance on South African organisations makes it appropriate to examine its impact on South African CSR assurance practices. As such, this paper represents one of the first studies to specifically consider the impact of a mandatory regulatory requirement for independent CSR assurance and suggests a future direction for global CSR assurance practices.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/aaaj-12-2013-1554

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Ackers, B. (2009), “Corporate social responsibility assurance: how do South African publicly listed companies compare?”, Meditari Accountancy Research , Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 1-17. · DOI
  2. Adams, C. and Evans, R. (2004), “Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap”, Journal of Corporate Citizenship , Vol. 14, Summer, pp. 97-115. · DOI
  3. Al-Hamadeen, R.M. (2007), “Assurance of corporate stand-alone reporting: evidence from the UK”, Unpublished PhD (Accounting) Thesis, School of Management, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews.
  4. Alves, I. (2009), “Green spin everywhere: how green-wash reveals the limits of the CSR paradigm”, Journal of Global Change and Governance , Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-26.
  5. Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2008), “Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity?”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 87 No. 1, pp. 279-288.
  6. Archel, P. , Fernández, M. and Larrinaga, C. (2008), “The organisational and operational boundaries of triple bottom line reporting: a survey”, Environmental Management , Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 106-117. · DOI
  7. Babbie, E. and Mouton, J. (2011), The Practice of Social Research (South African edition, twelfth impression), Oxford University Press Southern Africa, Cape Town.
  8. Bansal, P. (2005), “Evolving sustainability: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development”, Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 197-218. · DOI
  9. Bebbington, J. , Larrinaga, C. and Moneva, J.M. (2008), “Corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation risk management”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal , Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 337-361. · DOI
  10. Becht, M. , Bolton, P. and Röell, A. (2005), “Corporate governance and control”, ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance, Working Paper No. 02/2002, available at: C:/Users/User/Downloads/SSRN-id343461.pdf · DOI
  11. Berle, A.A. (1932), “For whom corporate managers are trustees: a note”, Harvard Law Review , Vol. 45 No. 8, pp. 1365-1372. · DOI
  12. Berle, A.A. (1931), “Corporate powers as powers in trust”, Harvard Law Review , Vol. 44 No. 7, pp. 1049-1074. · DOI
  13. Birkinshaw, J. , Brannen, M.Y. and Tung, R.L. (2011), “From a distance and generalizable to up close and grounded: reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research”, Journal of International Business Studies , Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 573-581. · DOI
  14. Bonn, I. and Fisher, J. (2005), “Corporate governance and business ethics: insights from the strategic planning experience”, Corporate Governance and Business Ethics , Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 730-738. · DOI
  15. Bourgeois, L.J. III (1981), “On the measurement of organisational slack”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 29-39. · DOI
  16. Cacioppe, R. , Forster, N. and Fox, M. (2008), “A survey of managers’ perceptions of corporate ethics and social responsibility and actions that may affect companies’ success”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 82 No. 3, pp. 681-700. · DOI
  17. Chow, C.W. (1982), “The demand for external auditing: size, debt and ownership influences”, The Accounting Review , Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 272-291.
  18. Coetzee, P. and Lubbe, D. (2011), “Internal audit and risk management in South Africa: adherence to guidance”, Acta Academica , Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 29-60. · DOI
  19. Davis, I. (2005), “What is the business of business?”, The McKinsey Quarterly , No. 3, pp. 105-113.
  20. De Beelde, I. and Tuybens, S. (2013), “Enhancing the credibility of reporting on corporate social responsibility in Europe”, Business Strategy and the Environment . · DOI
  21. Deegan, C. , Cooper, B. and Shelly, M. (2006), “An investigation of TBL report assurance reports: UK and European evidence”, Managerial Auditing Journal , Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 329-371. · DOI
  22. Dodd, E.M. (1932), “For whom are corporate managers trustees?”, Harvard Law Review , Vol. 45 No. 7, pp. 1145-1163. · DOI
  23. Driver, C. and Thompson, G. (2002), “Corporate governance and democracy: the stakeholder debate revisited”, Journal of Management and Governance , Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 111-130. · DOI
  24. Eccles, R.G. , Krzus, M.P. and Watson, L.A. (2012), “Integrated reporting requires integrated assurance”, in Oringel, J. (Ed.), Effective Auditing for Corporates: Key Developments in Practice and Procedures , Bloomsbury Information, London, pp. 161-178.
  25. Eccles, N.S. , Pillay, V. and de Jongh, D. (2008), “Correlates of corporate accountability amongst South Africa’s largest listed companies”, Southern African Business Review , Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 21-38.
  26. Eells, R. (1960), The Meaning of Modern Business: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Large Corporate Enterprise , Columbia University Press, New York, NY. · DOI
  27. Esser, I.M. (2008), “Recognition of various stakeholder interests in company management”, Unpublished LLD Thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
  28. Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens (Federation of European Accountants) (2006), “FEE calls for sustainability audit standard”, Accountancy , Vol. 130 No. 1355, p. 85.
  29. Fisher, C. and Lovell, A. (2006), Business Ethics and Values: Individual, Corporate and International Perspectives , 2nd ed., Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex.
  30. Galbreath, J. (2006), “Corporate social responsibility strategy: strategic options, global considerations”, Corporate Governance , Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 175-187. · DOI
  31. Gouws, D.G. and Cronjé, C.J. (2008), “Corporate annual reports: accounting practices in transition. Southern African Business Review , Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 108-132.
  32. Hart, S.L. (1997), “Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 66-76.
  33. Huggins, A. , Green, W.J. and Simnett, R. (2011), “The competitive market for assurance engagements on greenhouse gas statements: is there a role for assurors from the accounting profession?”, Current Issues in Auditing , Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. A1-A12.
  34. Hummels, H. and Timmer, D. (2004), “Investors in need of social, ethical, and environmental information”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 73-84. · DOI
  35. Johns, T.C. , Gregory, J.M. , Ingram, W.J. , Johnson, C.E. , Jones, A. , Lowe, J.A. , Mitchell, J.F.B. , Roberts, D.L. , Sexton, D.M.H. , Stevenson, D.S. , Tett, S.F.B. and Woodage, M.J. (2003), “Anthropogenic climate change for 1860 to 2100 simulated with the HadCM3 model under updated emissions scenarios”, Climate Dynamics , Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 583-612. · DOI
  36. Keasey, K. , Thompson, S. and Wright, M. (2005), Corporate Governance – Accountability, Enterprise and International Comparisons , Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex.
  37. Kolk, A. (2008), “Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices”, Business Strategy and the Environment , Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 1-15. · DOI
  38. Kolk, A. (2010), “Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs”, Journal of World Business , Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 367-374. · DOI
  39. Kolk, A. and Perego, P. (2010), “Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance reports: an international investigation”, Business Strategy and the Environment , Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 182-198. · DOI
  40. Kotler, P. and Lee, N. (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause , Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
  41. Manetti, G. and Becatti, L. (2009), “Assurance services for sustainability reports: standards and empirical evidence”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 87 No. 1, pp. 289-298. · DOI
  42. Manetti, G. and Toccafondi, S. (2012), “The role of stakeholders in sustainability reporting assurance”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 107 No. 3, pp. 363-377. · DOI
  43. Martinov-Bennie, N. and Hecimovic, A. (2011), “Assurance of Australian natural resource management”, Public Management Review , Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 549-565. · DOI
  44. Marx, B. and van Dyk, V. (2011), “Sustainability reporting and assurance: an analysis of assurance practices in South Africa”, Meditari Accountancy Research , Vol. 19 Nos 1/2, pp. 39-55. · DOI
  45. Mill, G.A. (2006), “The financial performance of a socially responsible investment over time and a possible link with corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 63 No. 2, pp. 131-148. · DOI
  46. Morimoto, R. , Ash, J. and Hope, C. (2005), “Corporate social responsibility audit: from theory to practice”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 62 No. 4, pp. 315-325. · DOI
  47. Nohria, N. (2010), “Foreword”, in Eccles, R.G. , Cheng, B. and Saltzman, D. (Eds), The Landscape of Integrated Reporting: Reflections and Next Steps , Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA, pp. i-ii.
  48. O’Dwyer, B. and Owen, D. (2005), “Assurance report practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland”, The British Accounting Review , Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 205-229. · DOI
  49. O’Dwyer, B. , Owen, D. and Unerman, J. (2011), “Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: the case of assurance on sustainability reporting”, Accounting, Organisations and Society , Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 31-52. · DOI
  50. Okoye, A. (2009), “Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: is a definition Necessary?”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 89 No. 4, pp. 613-627. · DOI
  51. Owen, D.L. , Swift, T.A. , Humphrey, C. and Bowerman, M. (2000), “The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions?”, The European Accounting Review , Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 81-98. · DOI
  52. Palazzo, G. and Scherer, A.G. (2006), “Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 71-88. · DOI
  53. Perego, P. (2009), “Causes and consequences of choosing different assurance providers: an international study of sustainability reporting”, International Journal of Management , Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 412-425.
  54. Polonsky, M.J. , Landreth, S. and Garma, R. (2010), “The new green-wash? Potential marketing problems with carbon offsets”, International Journal of Business Studies , Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 49-54.
  55. Quazi, A.M. and O’Brien, D. (2000), “An empirical test of a cross-national model of corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 33-510. · DOI
  56. Ramasamy, B. and Yeung, M. (2009), “Chinese consumers: perception of corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 88 No. 1, pp. 119-132. · DOI
  57. Rea, M.H. (2011), King III and GRI +12: A 2011 Review of Sustainability Reporting in South Africa , Law Printing.
  58. Saswani, Y. , Zain, M.M. and Darus, F. (2010), “Preliminary insights on sustainability reporting and assurance practices in Malaysia”, Social Responsibility Journal , Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 627-645. · DOI
  59. Saleh, M. (2009), “Corporate social responsibility disclosure in an emerging market: a longitudinal analysis approach”, International Business Research , Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 134-141. · DOI
  60. Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2010), Research Methods for Business – A Skill Building Approach , 5th ed., Wiley and Sons Ltd, London.
  61. Sierra, L. , Zorio, A. and García-Benau, M.A. (2013), “Sustainable development and assurance of corporate social responsibility reports published by Ibex-35 companies”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 359-370. · DOI
  62. Statman, M. (2000), “Socially responsible mutual funds”, Financial Analysts Journal , Vol. 56 No. 5, pp. 30-39. · DOI
  63. Teoh, H.Y. and Shiu, G.Y. (1990), “Attitudes towards corporate social responsibility and perceived importance of social responsibility information characteristics in a decision context”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 71-77. · DOI
  64. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development [UNRISD] (2000), “Promoting socially responsible business in developing countries: the potential and limits of voluntary initiatives”. Report of the UNRISD Workshop, 23-24 October, Geneva.
  65. Utting, P. (2005), “Beyond social auditing: micro and macro perspectives”, Presentation at the EU Conference on “Responsible Sources: Improving Global Supply Chains Management”, Brussels, 18 November.
  66. Waddock, S.A. and Graves, S.B. (1997), “The corporate social performance – financial performance link”, Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 303-319. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Welman, C. , Kruger, F. and Mitchell, B. (2011), Research Methodology , 3rd ed., Oxford University Press Southern Africa, Goodwood, South Africa.
  68. Wiertz, J.H.L. (2009), “Assurance report practices in CSR reporting: an international approach”. Unpublished MSc (International Business – Accountancy) Thesis, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Maastricht University, Maastricht.
  69. Wines, W.A. (2008), “Seven pillars of business ethics: towards a comprehensive framework”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 79 No. 4, pp. 483-499. · DOI
  70. Ackers, B. (2014), “Corporate social responsibility reporting: what boards of directors need to know”, Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition , Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 38-59. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Ackers, B., & Eccles, N. S.
Affiliations
University of South Africa (ZA)
ORCID
Venue
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2015-05-18
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
515-550
ISSN
0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/aaaj-12-2013-1554
OpenAlex
W1661308751
Cited by
181
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
27.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
Keywords
Johannesburg Stock Exchange, listed companies, auditing profession, corporate governance codes, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review