Identifying Gaps in Using Artificial Intelligence to Support Students with Intellectual Disabilities from Education and Health Perspectives
Abstract
Purpose Students with developmental/intellectual disabilities (ID/DD) often have serious health issues that require additional medical care and supervision. Serious health issues also mean increased absence and additional lags in academic achievement and development of adaptive and social skills. The incorporation of artificial intelligence in the education of a child with ID/DD could ameliorate the educational, adaptive and social skill gaps that occur as a direct result of persistent health problems. Design/methodology/approach The literature regarding the use of artificial intelligence in education for students with ID/DD was collected systematically from international online databases based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The collected articles were analyzed deductively, looking for the different gaps in the domain. Based on the literature, an artificial intelligence–based architecture is proposed and sketched. Findings The findings show that there are many gaps in supporting students with ID/DD through the utilization of artificial intelligence. Given that the majority of students with ID/DD often have serious and chronic and comorbid health conditions, the potential use of health information in artificial intelligence is even more critical. Therefore, there is a clear need to develop a system that facilitates communication and access to health information for students with ID/DD, one that provides information to caregivers and education providers, limits e…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-based platforms have been shown to reinforce and promote comprehension and retention by dynamically adjusting the complexity of educational materials, as supported by existing research [6,71].
“AI-based platforms have been shown to reinforce and promote comprehension and retention by dynamically adjusting the complexity of educational materials, as supported by existing research [6,71].”
From Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality on Educational Inclusion: A Systematic Review of Technologies Supporting Students with Disabilities (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 119 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Kharbat, F. F., Alshawabkeh, A., & Woolsey, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Al Ain University (AE)
- Emirates College for Advanced Education (AE)
- Venue
- Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-12-10
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-128
- ISSN
- 0001-253X (ISSN-L)
- 2050-3806
- OpenAlex
- W3110851460
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aslib Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, intellectual disability, developmental disabilities, chronic disease, comorbid health conditions, quality of life, health information access, AI architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review