The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic subject indexing with large language model fine-tuning and controlled vocabulary retrieval
Abstract
Purpose This study enhances automatic subject indexing techniques by addressing the limitations of conventional methods, which typically generate index terms that appear explicitly in the target documents or the training corpus. Design/methodology/approach We propose a subject indexing method based on large language model fine-tuning and controlled vocabulary retrieval (LLMFT-CVR). First, the large language model (LLM) is fine-tuned on training data to generate initial terms for a given document. Next, a text embedding model retrieves a set of candidate terms from the controlled vocabulary that are most similar to each of the initial terms. Finally, a term re-ranking model is trained to score the candidate terms, and the top-ranked terms are selected as the final recommended terms. Findings Experimental results on real-world bibliographic data demonstrate that LLMFT-CVR significantly outperforms the best-performing models of the three traditional approaches, i.e. lexical, associative and fusion approaches, by 22.55, 16.58 and 15.18% points in F1 score, respectively. Moreover, it achieves F1 score improvements of 14.69 and 4.09% points over the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and the fine-tuned large language model, respectively. Originality/value We introduce domain knowledge into LLM by leveraging training data and controlled vocabularies, thereby enhancing the quality of subject indexing and effectively mitigating hallucinations in the generated terms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685 · Cited by 13,453
Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023) · Library Hi Tech News · doi:10.1108/lhtn-01-2023-0009 · Cited by 1,355
Chow, E. H. C., Kao, T. J., & Li, X. (2024) · Cataloging & Classification Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01639374.2024.2394516 · Cited by 31
Automated Knowledge Organization AI ML based Subject Indexing System for Libraries
Ahmed, M., Mukhopadhyay, M., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2023) · DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology · doi:10.14429/djlit.43.01.18619 · Cited by 20
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Amar-Zifkin, 2025, Algorithmic indexing in MEDLINE frequently overlooks important concepts and may compromise literature search results, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 113, 39, 10.5195/jmla.2025.1936 · DOI
- Asula, 2021, Kratt: developing an automatic subject indexing tool for the National Library of Estonia, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 59, 775, 10.1080/01639374.2021.1998283 · DOI · Paper page
- Campos, 2020, YAKE! Keyword extraction from single documents using multiple local features, Information Sciences, 509, 257, 10.1016/j.ins.2019.09.013 · DOI
- Chou, 2022, An analysis of BERT (NLP) for assisted subject indexing for Project Gutenberg, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 60, 807, 10.1080/01639374.2022.2138666 · DOI
- Cox, 2023, ChatGPT: implications for academic libraries, College and Research Libraries News, 84, 99, 10.5860/crln.84.3.99 · DOI
- Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J. and Wang, H. (2023), “Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: a survey”, available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10997 (accessed 23 April 2025). · arXiv
- Gil-Leiva, 2017, SISA—automatic indexing system for scientific articles: experiments with location heuristics rules versus TF-IDF rules, Knowledge Organization, 44, 139, 10.5771/0943-7444-2017-3-139 · DOI
- Golub, 2021, Automated subject indexing: an overview, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 59, 702, 10.1080/01639374.2021.2012311 · DOI · Paper page
- Han, Z., Gao, C., Liu, J., Zhang, J. and Zhang, S.Q. (2024), “Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for large models: a comprehensive survey”, available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14608 (accessed 23 April 2025). · arXiv
- Kasprzik, 2023, Automating subject indexing at ZBW: making research results stick in practice, LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 33, 1, 10.53377/lq.13579 · DOI
- Lee, C., Roy, R., Xu, M., Raiman, J., Shoeybi, M., Catanzaro, B. and Ping, W. (2024), “Nv-embed: improved techniques for training llms as generalist embedding models”, available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17428 (accessed 8 July 2025). · arXiv
- Lund, 2024, ChatGPT in medical libraries, possibilities and future directions: an integrative review, Health Information and Libraries Journal, 41, 4, 10.1111/hir.12518 · DOI
- Mali, 2023, Use of Chat GPT in library services, International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 11, 264
- Medelyan, 2008, Domain-independent automatic keyphrase indexing with small training sets, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1026, 10.1002/asi.20790 · DOI
- Noruzi, 2024, The use of artificial intelligence in knowledge organization and subject indexing, Inform, 3, 1
- Patil, 2023, A survey of text representation and embedding techniques in nlp, IEEE Access, 11, 36120, 10.1109/access.2023.3266377 · DOI
- Reimers, N. and Gurevych, I. (2019), “Sentence-bert: sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks”, available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084 (accessed 8 July 2025). · DOI · Paper page
- Suominen, 2022, Bibliographic Control in the Digital Ecosystem, Associazione Italiana Biblioteche, Firenze, Italy, 245
- Toepfer, 2020, Fusion architectures for automatic subject indexing under concept drift: analysis and empirical results on short texts, International Journal on Digital Libraries, 21, 169, 10.1007/s00799-018-0240-3 · DOI
- Yang, 2023, Research on the automatic subject-indexing method of academic papers based on climate change domain ontology, Sustainability, 15, 1, 10.3390/su15053919 · DOI
- York, 2024, Enriching bibliographic records using AI–a pilot by Ex Libris, Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 28, 287, 10.1080/10875301.2024.2361871 · DOI
- Zhao, W.X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Wang, X., Hou, Y., Min, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, J., Dong, Z. and Du, Y. (2023), “A survey of large language models”, available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.18223 (accessed 23 April 2025). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Research on Large Language Model-Based Bibliographic Cataloging Agent in the CNMARC Context
Tan, Z., Yang, X., Chen, Q., & Chen, T. (2026) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications14010019 · Cited by 2
“…approach based on generative large models, researchers conducted experiments on hierarchical document classification and subject indexing, demonstrating that fine‑tuned models can significantly improve performance in multi‑level classification tasks(Feng, 2025; Luo & Liu, 2025; Z. Hu et al., 2025).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, P., & Liu, Z.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Venue
- Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2025-10-27
- Pages
- 1-20
- ISSN
- 0001-253X (ISSN-L)
- 2050-3806
- 2050-3814
- OpenAlex
- W4415592502
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aslib Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Social Science Fund of China (24CTQ022)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- automatic subject indexing, controlled vocabulary, LLM fine-tuning, bibliographic metadata, retrieval-augmented generation, hallucination mitigation, domain knowledge, text embeddings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review