Permission email marketing and its influence on online shopping
Abstract
Purpose: While the Internet has emerged as a retail force to be reckoned with, its’ success is dependent, at least in part, on other promotional tools. One such tool is permission email marketing (PEM). Operating within the framework of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study explores the influence of PEM on the perceived value derived from Internet shopping. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected through an online survey in Melbourne, Australia. Utilising a sample of 338 consumers, the resulting data was analysed using structural equation modelling. Findings: The results of the study indicate that PEM positively influences the perceived usefulness, ease of use and enjoyment derived from shopping online. Furthermore, it also serves to reduce the perceived risk. PEM serves as an important extension of the TAM, with the findings from this study highlighting not only what the sources of online shopping value are, but also how they can be influenced. Research limitations/implications: The limitation applies to the research context in which the study was carried out – fashion shopping. Practical implications: The study confirms the importance of PEM and highlights to retailers that they have another important tool at their disposal. Originality/value: This study highlights the importance of PEM and support the proposition that its key source of value lies in providing information that the consumer wants. Such relevance is the key of distinction between PEM and SPAM. Despite the rapid growth of Internet shopping in Australia, very few online shopping studies have been conducted in an Australian context. This study helps to address such an oversight.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Attitude is the strongest driver of intention to choose an online channel.
“Second, attitude is confirmed to be the strongest driver of intention to choose an online channel, in line with the theories (including TAM and TPB) and numerous empirical studies (Pennington et al. 2003;Reimers et al., 2016;Wu, 2006).”
From Drivers of Consumer Adoption of e-Commerce: a Meta-Analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Reimers et al., 2016
Cites
On risk, convenience, and Internet shopping behavior
Bhatnagar, A., Misra, S., & Rao, H. R. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/353360.353371 · Cited by 1,089 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Drivers of Consumer Adoption of e-Commerce: a Meta-Analysis
Zerbini, C., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Maestripieri, S., & Luceri, B. (2022) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.04.003 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reimers, V., Chao, C.-W., & Gorman, S.
- Affiliations
- Federation University (AU)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Venue
- Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-03-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1355-5855 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2340855157
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics (publishedVersion)
- FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Keywords
- online shopping, perceived value, technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, risk perception, shopping enjoyment, fashion shopping, spam, e-commerce promotion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review