Cited by 36Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyAgriculture and Agroindustry StudiesQuality and Supply Management

Price satisfaction and producer loyalty: the role of mediators in business to business relationships in Kenyan mango supply chain

Mutonyi, Sarah, Beukel, Karin, Gyau, Amos, Hjortsø, Carsten Nico·2016·British Food Journal

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate which dimensions of price satisfaction influence producers’ trust in buyers and assess the mediating role of such trust in the relationship between price satisfaction and producer loyalty in fresh fruit supply chains. Design/methodology/approach: A cross-sectional study design using both semi-structured interviews and structured questionnaires was used. The study was conducted in the eastern part of Kenya and included 600 smallholders. Data was analysed using structural equation modelling. Findings: The results show that price fairness, price reliability, and relative price are dimensions of price satisfaction that affect producers’ trust in the buyer. Moreover, trust between the producer and the buyer is found to be a strong mediator between price satisfaction and producer loyalty. The findings support recent studies about trust and its mediating role. Research limitations/implications: The paper is based on a cross-sectional study design, limiting the causal inferences which can be drawn. Producers’ preferences change with time and future studies should be based on longitudinal designs. Originality/value: This paper shows the relationship between the multidimensional nature of price satisfaction and producer loyalty with trust as a mediating variable in the business-to-business (B2B) context. Although B2B relationships have been shown to be of great importance for smallholders in enhancing business performance with their buyers, little attention has been given to the role of trust as a mediator. This study offers interesting insights into the how trust plays a mediating role between price satisfaction and loyalty in a developing country context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/bfj-09-2015-0319

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mutonyi, S., Beukel, K., Gyau, A., & Hjortsø, C. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • World Agroforestry Centre (KE)
Venue
British Food Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-03-15
Volume
118
Issue
5
ISSN
0007-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2407563851
Cited by
36
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Food Journal (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture and Agroindustry Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
Keywords
price satisfaction, price fairness, relative prices, mediating effect of trust, business-to-business relationships, mango supply chain, smallholder farmers, Kenya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review