Cited by 73Efficiency Analysis Using DEAAgricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural Economics and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Farm‐Specific Technical Efficiencies and Development Policies

Kalirajan, K.·1984·Journal of Economic Studies

Abstract

Agricultural policies in developing countries are mostly concerned with the means of increasing production levels, especially of food grains. The green revolution or new technology has been recognised by decision makers as an important tool in this context. Consequently, the primary objective of any agricultural policy is to achieve high rates of adoption of new technology by farmers. The fact that the success of new technology depends on the efficient use of the technology receives less attention from the decision makers. How crucial this issue of the efficient use of technology is to increasing production levels is examined in this article. The empirical focus is the area with the highest rate of adoption of new technology in the Philippines. Using the stochastic production frontier, farm‐specific technical efficiency is empirically estimated for individual sample observations. The results show a wide variation in the level of technical efficiencies among the sample farmers; and an extension service has been identified as an important factor causing such variations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/eb002579

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Aigner D. J., 1968, American Economic Review, 58, 826
  2. Barker R., 1969, Agricultural Economic Department
  3. Kalirajan K., 1983, Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, 2, 167
  4. Orcino N., 1974, Agricultural Engineering Department
  5. PCARR (Philippine Council for Agriculture and Resources Research), 1977, Los Banos
  6. Wells M., 1967, Algorithm 251, in Collected Algorithms

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kalirajan, K.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Kalirajan, K.
Venue
Journal of Economic Studies
Publisher
Emerald
Published
1984-03-01
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
3-13
ISSN
0144-3585 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035560551
Cited by
70
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Economic Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
Keywords
agricultural technology adoption, agricultural extension, stochastic production frontier, Green Revolution, agricultural development policy, food grain production, Philippine agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review