The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Abstract
The information seeking patterns of a group of research physicists and research chemists were analysed and the key features of those patterns identified. The aim was to use a similar methodology to that employed in a previous study of the information seeking activities of a group of social scientists and to effect a comparison between the information seeking patterns of the scientists and the social scientists. The information seeking patterns were derived from interviews with physicists at Manchester University and chemists at the University of Sheffield. The methodology adopted for the interviews and analysis was qualitative and based on the grounded theory approach. The results were then compared with the findings of the previous study of the social scientists to try and identify similarities and differences between the two groups. Certain minor variations concerned with awareness levels of facilities, the extent of usage of a source and the research stage at which a strategy may be employed were identified. Nonetheless, fundamental differences in information seeking behaviour could not be determined. Finally, the extent to which developments in electronic communication have had any impact on the information or communication patterns of the scientists and social scientists is considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Cited by
Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior
(2016) · Studies in Information · doi:10.1108/s2055-53772016 · Cited by 1,540
Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm
White, R. W., & Roth, R. A. (2009) · Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services · doi:10.2200/s00174ed1v01y200901icr003 · Cited by 632
A model of information practices in accounts of everyday‐life information seeking
McKenzie, P. J. (2003) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410310457993 · Cited by 606
Ellis, D., & Haugan, M. (1997) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eum0000000007204 · Cited by 529
Self-citationInformation seeking behavior of academic scientists
Hemminger, B. M., Lu, D., Vaughan, K. T. L., & Adams, S. J. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20686 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- ELLIS, D., COX, D., & HALL, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Documentation
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 356-369
- ISSN
- 0022-0418 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987833517
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/eb026919
- The paper
- ELLIS, D., COX, D., & HALL, K. (1993). A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES. Journal of Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.