Cited by 169Library Science and Information LiteracyLibrary Science and InformationLibrary Collection Development and Digital Resources

Information seeking behavior of academic scientists

Hemminger, Bradley M., Lu, Dihui, Vaughan, K.T.L., Adams, Stephanie J.·2007·Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Abstract

The information seeking behavior of academic scientists is being transformed by the availability of electronic resources for searching, retrieving, and reading scholarly materials. A census survey was conducted of academic science researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to capture their current information seeking behavior. Nine hundred two subjects (26%) completed responses to a 15‐minute Web‐based survey. The survey questions were designed to quantify the transition to electronic communications and how this affects different aspects of information seeking. Significant changes in information seeking behavior were found, including increased reliance on web based resources, fewer visits to the library, and almost entirely electronic communication of information. The results can guide libraries and other information service organizations as they adapt to meet the needs of today's information searchers. Simple descriptive statistics are reported for the individual questions. Additionally, analysis of results is broken out by basic science and medical science departments. The survey tool and protocol used in this study have been adopted for use in a nationwide survey of the information seeking behavior of academic scientists.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.20686

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hemminger, B. M., Lu, D., Vaughan, K. T. L., & Adams, S. J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12
Volume
58
Issue
14
Pages
2205-2225
ISSN
  • 1532-2882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2890
OpenAlex
W4247973987
Cited by
169
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
34.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oklahoma
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
Keywords
information seeking, academic scientists, electronic resources, scholarly communication, library use, online information sources, digital communication, library adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review