The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the determinants of green innovation adoption in SMEs: a PLS-SEM approach
Abstract
Purpose: Currently, environmental and social concerns have made green innovation more popular among researchers and practitioners around the globe. Developed countries tend to focus more on this issue, compared to developing countries. However, the reality shows that small- to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are considered as high contributors to environmental pollution. This study is designed for, and conducted on, SMEs in a developing country, Pakistan. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the main determinants of green innovation adoption in SMEs in Pakistan. Design/methodology/approach: A data sample of 288 SMEs from five different sectors was collected and analyzed using the partial least squares structural equation modeling technique. Findings: The results of the study indicate that organizational and human resource factors, market and customer factors, and government support and technological factors have a positive and significant impact, whereas external partnership and cooperation, and rules and regulatory factors have an insignificant impact on green innovation adoption in SMEs in Pakistan. Originality/value: The outcomes of the study have important implications for managers as well as for government policy makers regarding framing better policies to promote green practices in SMEs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications
Geisser, S. (1975) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865 · Cited by 2,748
Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study1
Chau, P. Y. K., & Tam, K. Y. (1997) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249740 · Cited by 1,067
Purchasing's Role in Environmental Management: Cross‐Functional Development of Grounded Theory
Carter, C. R., & Dresner, M. (2001) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2001.tb00102.x · Cited by 384
Cited by
Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., & Appolloni, A. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2865 · Cited by 312
Badghish, S., & Soomro, Y. A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16051864 · Cited by 261
Green finance and sustainability development goals in Indonesian Fund Village
Ronaldo, R., & Suryanto, T. (2022) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102839 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Jun, W., Ali, W., Bhutto, M. Y., Hussain, H., & Khan, N. A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-12-13
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-87
- ISSN
- 1460-1060 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996344835
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the determinants of green innovation adoption in SMEs: a PLS-SEM approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ejim-05-2019-0113
- The paper
- Jun, W., Ali, W., Bhutto, M. Y., Hussain, H., & Khan, N. A. (2019). Examining the determinants of green innovation adoption in SMEs: a PLS-SEM approach. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-05-2019-0113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
