The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standing on the shoulders of giants? A critical review of empirical talent management research
Open accessAbstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to frame empirical literature on talent management (TM), and to provide a clear and comprehensive picture of the topics under investigation, the conceptualization of TM, and under-explored areas.Design/methodology/approach - The authors adopted a systematic review that covers empirical research on TM which has been published between 2006 and 2014 in academic peer-reviewed journals. A total of 96 articles were included in the review. A bibliometric as well as a content analysis has been carried out.Findings - The results reveal that the Anglo-Saxon context (in particular EU) has a great impact on empirical TM research. Also research foundations and designs are not very rigorous. A slight awareness of context and culture was found. Empirical TM research is predominantly built on an exclusive approach to TM. Yet, how TM works in practice and how well (from the perspective of multiple actors) as well as the role and perceptions of line managers are under-explored areas.Practical implications - The paper gives vision and direction to practitioners in particular on the definition of talent and TM.Originality/value - This study frames the extent and nature of empirical research on TM, and it is the first to specifically and objectively examine the advances made in the field and to identify under-explored areas. By doing so, it helps to avoid presumptions and misguided beliefs, to advance the knowledge of TM issues in organizations and regions, and to better channel future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 · Cited by 36,742
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda
Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.04.001 · Cited by 1,837 · cited 9×
“…we observed that there are two main approaches to TM conceptualization in the literature: one referring to the strategic side of TM (CIPD, 2006, 2008; Collings & Mellahi, 2009; Stahl et al., 2007), and the other that refers to Global TM (Collings & Scullion, 2008; Scullion, Collings & Caligiuri,…”
BackgroundInfluentialCommonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research
Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x · Cited by 1,538
Talent management: A critical review
Lewis, R. E., & Heckman, R. J. (2006) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.001 · Cited by 1,341
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2022) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036232009 · Cited by 1,172
Tarique, I., & Schuler, R. S. (2010) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.019 · Cited by 914
What is the meaning of ‘talent’ in the world of work?
Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & González-Cruz, T. F. (2013) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.002 · Cited by 614
Self-citationIles, P., Chuai, X., & Preece, D. (2009) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.014 · Cited by 535
Talent management: Current theories and future research directions
Al Ariss, A., Cascio, W. F., & Paauwe, J. (2014) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.001 · Cited by 530
Cited by
Re-engineering the role of leadership in nurturing and navigating talent management in Academia
Hazel, M., Ngirande, H., & Muchowe, R. M. (2024) · Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6880-0.ch013 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallardo-Gallardo, E., & Thunnissen, M.
- Venue
- Employee Relations
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-01-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-56
- ISSN
- 0142-5455 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2256799039
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 30.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standing on the shoulders of giants? A critical review of empirical talent management research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/er-10-2015-0194
- The paper
- Gallardo-Gallardo, E., & Thunnissen, M. (2016). Standing on the shoulders of giants? A critical review of empirical talent management research. Employee Relations. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-10-2015-0194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.