Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior
Abstract
Individual level innovation studies often assess only one dimension of innovative behavior. As such, they do not sufficiently capture the richness of the construct of individual innovation. Develops and tests a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Identifies descriptions of 289 innovation related behaviors and codes these into a hypothesized factor structure consisting of the following five dimensions: opportunity exploration, generativity, formative investigation, championing, and application. Structural equation modeling used on a sample of 225 employees from nine different organizations delivered a relatively poor fit between the hypothesized factor structure and respondents’ job behaviors. However, a single factor measure based on items representing all five factors resulted in an alpha reliability of 0.95 thus supporting a multi‐dimensional conceptualization of innovative behavior in general. Discusses implications for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Innovative behavior has a positive effect on organizational innovation.
“In addition, many other studies have demonstrated that innovative behavior has a positive effect on organizational innovation [141-149].”
From A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [146]
Cites
Practical issues in structural modeling
BENTLER, P. M., & CHOU, C.-P. (1987) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004 · Cited by 5,804 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sung, W., & Kim, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042079 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Norouzinik, Y., Rahimnia, F., Maharati, Y., & Eslami, G. (2022) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2021.1897467 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Kittel, A. F. D., & Seufert, T. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286065 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Capital
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 284-296
- ISSN
- 1469-1930 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000389016
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Intellectual Capital (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
- Keywords
- individual innovative behavior, multidimensional measurement, opportunity exploration, generativity, applications, factor structure, employee innovation, employee behavior, scale development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review