The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability and firm valuation: an international investigation
Abstract
Purpose: – This paper aims to examine whether capital market rewards firms with good corporate sustainability practices in an international setting by using the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI hereafter) as an integrated measure of firm sustainability performance. Design/methodology/approach: – There are two alternative theories regarding the impact of sustainability on firm value. The value-creating theory predicts that integration of environmental and social responsibility into corporate strategies and practices reduces firm risk and promotes long-term value creation. The value-destroying theory on sustainability suggests that managers may engage in socially responsible activities at the expense of shareholders. To perform empirical tests, we use a large international sample for a period of 13 years between 1999 (the first year when DJSI became available) and 2011. To control for self-selection bias and simultaneity, the authors use lagged values of sustainability performance in a robustness check. Findings: – The authors find a positive relation between sustainability performance and firm value, after controlling for variables that have been found to affect firm value in the existing literature. The test results are consistent with the value enhancing theory (as opposed to the shareholder expense theory) regarding the role of sustainability engagement in firm valuation. Furthermore, the positive impact of sustainability engagement on firm value is primarily driven by countries with strong investor protection and with high disclosure levels. Research limitations/implications: – A positive impact of sustainability performance on firm value supports the value-creating theory and rejects the value-destroying theory. Test results also suggest a more pronounced market response to corporate sustainability in countries with stronger shareholders protection and higher requirement for financial transparency. Practical implications: – Given the growing international capital market and intensifying global competition, the valuation implications of sustainability in an international context is of practical interest to management, investors and regulators worldwide. Originality/value: – First, it is an initial attempt to test an integrated measure of the “triple-bottom-line” definition of sustainability in an international setting. Second, our paper studies the international variation in market valuation of firm sustainability performance in terms of the value enhancing versus shareholder expense theories on sustainability. The authors explore the relevance of sustainability performance in relation to the investor protection and the reporting environment across countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Investor protection and corporate governance
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(00)00065-9 · Cited by 6,848
Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007 · Cited by 3,465
Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-10218 · Cited by 1,916
Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry
Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer, R. J. (2013) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.10.005 · Cited by 645
Cited by
Sandberg, H., Alnoor, A., & Tiberius, V. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3259 · Cited by 285
García‐Sánchez, I., Rodríguez‐Ariza, L., Aibar‐Guzmán, B., & Aibar‐Guzmán, C. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2485 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, M., & Zhao, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Accounting and Information Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-08-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-307
- ISSN
- 1758-9037 (ISSN-L)
- 1834-7649
- OpenAlex
- W1570209723
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability and firm valuation: an international investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijaim-07-2014-0050
- The paper
- Yu, M., & Zhao, R. (2015). Sustainability and firm valuation: an international investigation. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-07-2014-0050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.