The impact of perceived service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction: An empirical study on public sector banks in India
Abstract
Purpose: In the present competitive scenario in the Indian banking industry, service quality has become one of the most important facets of interest to academic researchers. The purpose of this paper is to determine the dimensions of perceived service quality and investigate their impact on customer satisfaction in the Indian banking context, with special reference to selected public sector banks in India. Design/methodology/approach: On the basis of the empirical study, the authors validate a measurement model using structural equation modeling for investigating the impact of perceived service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction. The study sample consists of 480 respondents in the National Capital Region (NCR) of India; the data were collected through a structured questionnaire utilizing a seven-point Likert scale while implementing a purposive sampling technique. Findings: The perceived service quality dimensions identified were tangibility, reliability, assurance, responsiveness, empathy, and image. The empirical findings revealed that “responsiveness” was found to be the most significant predictor of customer satisfaction. On the other hand, “image” (corporate image) has a positive but the least significant relationship with customer satisfaction followed by all other constructs. The exception is “reliability,” which is insignificantly related to customer satisfaction in Indian public sector banks. Research limitations/implications: The study cannot be generalized in the context of Indian banking sectors, as it only focused on the public sector. The findings of this study suggest that the six dimensions of perceived service quality model are a suitable instrument for evaluating bank service quality for public banks in India. Therefore, bank managers can use this model to assess the bank service quality in the context of Indian public sector banks. Originality/value: There is dearth of research focusing on corporate image as a dimension of perceived service quality and its effect on customer satisfaction in the Indian banking context. Furthermore, similar studies were rarely found in the Indian context, especially within the public banking sector. Hence, this paper attempts to accomplish the research gap by empirically testing the satisfaction level of a large sample of the population in NCR toward six dimensions of perceived service quality rendered by selected public sector banks in India.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reliability has a positive relationship with customer satisfaction in the banking sector.
“The extant literature has also revealed that reliability has a positive relationship with customer satisfaction in the banking sector [46,47,49,50,54].”
From The Service Quality Dimensions that Affect Customer Satisfaction in the Jordanian Banking Sector (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
The reliability findings are consistent with previous studies [46,47,49,50,54].
“These findings are consistent with previous studies [46,47,49,50,54].”
From The Service Quality Dimensions that Affect Customer Satisfaction in the Jordanian Banking Sector (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
Banking sector responsiveness has a direct relationship with customer satisfaction.
“Arguably, banking sector responsiveness has a direct relationship with customer satisfaction [46,49,50,55].”
From The Service Quality Dimensions that Affect Customer Satisfaction in the Jordanian Banking Sector (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
These results are consistent with previous studies in Iran, Uganda, Jordan and India, which show the importance of service quality to improve bank customer satisfaction.
“These results are consistent with previous studies in Iran, Uganda, Jordan and India, which show the importance of service quality to improve bank customer satisfaction [45,46,62,69].”
From The Service Quality Dimensions that Affect Customer Satisfaction in the Jordanian Banking Sector (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334 · see citing works
Bloemer, J., de Ruyter, K., & Peeters, P. (1998) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652329810245984 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Service Quality Dimensions that Affect Customer Satisfaction in the Jordanian Banking Sector
Pakurár, M., Haddad, H., Nagy, J., Popp, J., & Oláh, J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11041113 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kant, R., & Jaiswal, D.
- Affiliations
- Central University of Himachal Pradesh (IN)
- Venue
- International Journal of Bank Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-05-15
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-430
- ISSN
- 0265-2323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2597696183
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 15.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Bank Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Banking Sector Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Keywords
- perceived service quality, customer satisfaction, SERVQUAL dimensions, state-owned banks, Indian banking sector, responsiveness, corporate image, reliability, tangibility, assurance, empathy, bank service quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review