Cited by 9Diverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchTheatre and Performance StudiesMuseums and Cultural Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Social inclusion and audience development at the Royal Opera House: a tourist perspective

Guachalla, Adrian·2017·International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research

Abstract

Purpose: The Royal Opera House, located at the epicentre of Covent Garden, stands as the UK’s leading provider of opera and ballet performances. Having been extensively redeveloped, its front facade is not visible from the area’s central market place and the perceived exclusivity and elitism commonly associated with its art forms also impose a challenge. This study aims to analyze the influence that the Opera House exerts on the tourist’s perception and experience of the world-renowned London’s “Theatreland”. Design/methodology/approach: In all, three hundred and six semi-structured interviews with domestic, international, first-time and repeat tourists were conducted in six different locations throughout the area and inside the flagship building using a convenience sampling approach. These were then analyzed with the assistance of qualitative data analysis software (QSR N*Vivo) in two stages leading to an initial set of categorical topics that derived in a number of findings related to the factors that influence the tourist’s perception and experience of place. Findings: The Opera House’s perceived urban concealment proved to have an impact on its influence on Covent Garden’s sense of place. But its social inclusion and audience development initiatives that foster a new generation of opera and ballet theatre-goers emerged as important findings as the House’s open door policy for daytime visitors along with live relays of current opera and ballet productions in other locations spark an interest in experiencing the building from the inside. Research limitations/implications: This paper focuses exclusively on findings related to audience development and social inclusion initiatives currently used at the Royal Opera House and their impact on the tourist’s perception and experience of place. However, many other factors influence these processes and scope for further research is highlighted. Practical implications: The Royal Opera House’s perceived urban concealment imposes a challenge to the task of developing new audiences for its current and future productions. Its learning and participation unit must endeavor to engage younger and international markets by focusing on the quality of the House’s performances, its heritage and added facilities of the venue such as exhibitions and shop. Social implications: The Royal Opera House’s creed of “excellence, access and artistic development” is implemented by extending opportunities to younger target markets to engage with its cultural produce. Originality/value: This paper addresses the gap in knowledge related to the development of the niche Opera House tourist segment of the cultural tourism market.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijcthr-07-2016-0071

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 2007, Marking difference or making a difference: constructing places, policies and knowledge of inclusion, exclusion and social justice in leisure, sport and tourism, 77, 10.1016/B978-0-08-045098-8.50010-6 · DOI
  2. 1999, Interviewing for Social Scientists
  3. 2000, Qualitative Researching: with Text, Image and Sound, A Practical Handbook
  4. BBC, 1999, The Official BBC Guide to the Reopening of the Royal Opera House
  5. 2002, Arts as a means of alleviating social exclusion: does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8, 91, 10.1080/102866302900324658 · DOI
  6. 2005, Tourism and social inclusion, Tourism Culture & Communication, 6, 1, 10.3727/109830405776746823 · DOI
  7. 1983, The Field of Cultural Production
  8. 1984, 1986, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste
  9. 2004, Social Research Methods
  10. 2008, Cultural inclusion, exclusion and the formative roles of museums, Museum Management and Curatorship, 23, 261, 10.1080/09647770802234078 · DOI
  11. 2003, The Sydney Opera House: an Australian icon, International Journal of Arts Management, 5, 69
  12. 2007, The Good Research Guide
  13. 2003, Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials
  14. 1978, Social class and arts consumption: the origins and consequences of class: differences in exposure to the Arts in America, Theory and Society, 5, 141, 10.1007/BF01702159 · DOI
  15. 2002, The Role of Recreation in Promoting Social Inclusion
  16. 2008, City Spaces Tourist Places: Urban Tourism Precincts
  17. 2000, Tourism and Leisure Research Methods: Data Collection, Analysis and Interpretation
  18. 2016, Journeys to the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao: towards a revised Bilbao effect, Annals of Tourism Research, 59, 79, 10.1016/j.annals.2016.04.001 · DOI
  19. 2000, Discourse analysis, 172
  20. 2005, Social capital and fisheries governance, Ocean and Coastal Management, 48, 753
  21. 2008, Looking beyond image and tourism: the role of flagship cultural projects in local arts development, Planning, Practice and Research, 23, 495, 10.1080/02697450802522806 · DOI
  22. 2013, The role of cultural flagships in the perception and experience of urban areas for tourism and culture: case study: the Royal Opera House in Covent Garden, European Journal for Tourism Research, 1, 83
  23. 2016, Perception and experience of urban areas for cultural tourism: a social constructivist approach in Covent Garden, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 10.1177/1467358416646820 · DOI
  24. 2015, Behaviour and attitude: the Theatre Talks method as audience development, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 21, 344, 10.1080/10286632.2014.904299 · DOI
  25. 1986, Fragmented world of symbolic forms: reflections on Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of culture, Theory, Culture and Society, 3, 55, 10.1177/026327686003003006 · DOI
  26. 2000, Arts, Entertainment and Tourism
  27. 2004, Arts, education and society: the role of the arts in promoting the emotional wellbeing and social inclusion of young people, Support for Learning, 19, 57, 10.1111/j.0268-2141.2004.00321.x · DOI
  28. Kawashima, N. (2000), “Beyond the division of attenders vs non-attenders: a study into audience development in policy and practice”, Working Paper, Vol. 6. University of Warwick; Centre for Cultural Policy Studies, Coventry.
  29. 2006, Audience development and social inclusion in Britain, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12, 55, 10.1080/10286630600613309 · DOI
  30. 2002, Dixon Jones: Buildings and Projects 1959-2002
  31. 2003, Demand, 201
  32. 2015, Talking about theatre: audience development through dialogue, Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 12, 234
  33. 2010, Understanding the benefits of social tourism: linking participation to subjective well-being and quality of life, International Journal of Tourism Research, 12, 761, 10.1002/jtr.791 · DOI
  34. 2002, Towards a classification of cultural tourists, International Journal of Tourism Research, 4, 29, 10.1002/jtr.346 · DOI
  35. 1999, The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class
  36. 2004, The glass menagerie of urban governance and social cohesion: concepts and stakes/concepts as stakes, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 49
  37. 2002, Of States and Cities: The Partitioning of Urban Space
  38. 1995, The House: Inside the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden
  39. 2001, An analysis of the concept of cool and its marketing implications, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1, 311
  40. OECD, 2001, The Well-being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital, 10.1787/9789264189515-en · DOI
  41. 2000, Social capital: a fad or a fundamental concept?
  42. 2009, Understanding social inclusion, social cohesion, and social capital, International Journal of Social Economics, 36, 1133, 10.1108/03068290910996963 · DOI
  43. 1976, The Sociology of Leisure
  44. 2007, Organizing and Managing your Research: A Practical Guide for Postgraduates
  45. 2004, Theatre audience education or how to see a play: toward a curriculum theory for spectatorship in the performing arts, Youth Theatre Journal, 18, 45, 10.1080/08929092.2004.10012563 · DOI
  46. 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community
  47. 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods
  48. 2015, Participations on participation: researching the active theatre audience, Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 12, 271
  49. 2002, Museum and performing arts marketing: the age of discovery, The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 32, 7, 10.1080/10632920209597330 · DOI
  50. 1996, Production and consumption of European cultural tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 23, 261, 10.1016/0160-7383(95)00063-1 · DOI
  51. 2007, Cultural Tourism: Global and Local Perspectives
  52. 1998, Museums as agents of social inclusion, Museum Management and Curatorship, 17, 401, 10.1080/09647779800401704 · DOI
  53. 2009, Talking theatre is more than a test drive: two audience development methodologies under review, International Journal of Arts Management, 12, 4
  54. 2005, Just art for a just city: public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration, Urban Studies, 42, 1001
  55. 2000, Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook
  56. 2011, Oslo’s new opera house: cultural flagship, regeneration tool or destination icon?, European Urban and Regional Studies, 18, 93, 10.1177/0969776410382595 · DOI
  57. 2007, Cultural tourism in a changing world, Tourism: The Journal for the Tourism Industry, 1, 18
  58. 2010, Practical Tourism Research
  59. 1998, Tourism and the personal heritage experience, Annals of Tourism Research, 24, 751
  60. 1999, In House-Covent Garden. 50 Years of Opera and Ballet
  61. 2013, A Handbook of Cultural Economics
  62. 2002, The Tourist Gaze
  63. 2006, The utility of discourse analysis to heritage studies: The Burra Charter and social inclusion, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12, 339, 10.1080/13527250600727000 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 2004, Place promotion and iconography in Shanghai’s Xintiandi, Habitat International, 30, 245
  65. 2001, The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes, Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2 No. 1, 11
  66. 2013, Case Study Research: Design and Methods

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guachalla, A.
Affiliations
Buckinghamshire New University (GB)
Corresponding author
Guachalla, Adrian
Venue
International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2017-08-07
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
436-449
ISSN
1750-6182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2728211198
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Culture Tourism and Hospitality Research (publishedVersion)
  • Bucks New University Repository (Bucks New University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
Royal Opera House, social inclusion, audience development, cultural tourism, opera and ballet, Covent Garden, tourist perceptions, sense of place, cultural heritage, young audiences, foreign tourists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review