Student roles and behaviors in higher education co-creation – a systematic literature review
Abstract
Purpose In today’s global and highly competitive climate among universities, educational developers and instructors have focused more on trying to make the student experience more engaging. In this manner, student co-creation activities have recently become a major research priority in marketing and higher education (HE) research. The purpose of this study is to present a systematic review of the literature on student co-creation roles and behaviors in HE in order to map extant research on this topic and offer a consolidated view of the co-creation process and approaches that can be employed by HEIs to motivate students to co-create their HE experience. Design/methodology/approach A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach was followed to classify, select, synthesize, analyze and assess the most relevant studies on student participation in co-creation in HE. Findings This study’s analysis has identified that the co-creation process in HE includes dialog, access, risk and transparency. The main approaches used by higher education institutions (HEIs) to motivate students to co-create their HE experience are student involvement, cognitive engagement, university affiliation and emotional engagement. Our review also shows that student co-creation behaviors are mainly participation and citizenship behavior, and their co-creation roles include those of co-producers, participants, change agents and partners. Originality/value This systematic literature review analyses and critically discusses the state of the art in student co-creation roles in HE and the approaches HEIs use. By providing a map of existing research, the paper contributes both to the clarification of student co-creation roles and behaviors in HE and the identification of research gaps and opportunities for further research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students who actively participate in co-creation initiatives take full responsibility for their learning and use teachers and other resources to help them succeed.
“Students who actively participate in co-creation initiatives 'take full responsibility for their learning and use teachers and other resources to help them succeed' (Mavondo et al., 2004, p. 46; Zarandi et al., 2022, p. 1299).”
From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Zarandi et al., 2022
Cites
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · see citing works
Context and mobile services' value-in-use
Gummerus, J., & Pihlström, M. (2011) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.07.002 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment design through co-creation
Williams, A., & Ingle, E. (2025) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5802 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zarandi, N., Soares, A. M., & Alves, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Minho (PT)
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2022-10-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1297-1320
- ISSN
- 0951-354X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4301395122
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Keywords
- student co-creation, higher education, student participation, student engagement, student involvement, cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, university affiliation, change agents, higher education marketing, student experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review