Cited by 161Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourService and Product Innovation

Context and mobile services' value-in-use

Gummerus, Johanna, Pihlström, Minna·2011·Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.07.002

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gummerus, J., & Pihlström, M.
Affiliations
Hanken School of Economics (FI)
Corresponding author
Gummerus, Johanna
Venue
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
521-533
ISSN
0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071140632
Cited by
161
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
24.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
mobile services, value-in-use, conditional value, uncertain conditions, consumer preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review