The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Online search for information about universities: a Hong Kong study
Abstract
Purpose: A fuller understanding of the information search behaviour of prospective students in the digital era is one of the keys to success in university recruitment. The purpose of this paper is to investigate students’ university choice factors in relation to the online environment. Design/methodology/approach: In total, 637 samples from 11 private higher education institutions were collected and tested against assumptions before performing statistical analysis including exploratory factor analysis and mean comparison. Findings: The findings revealed that there are some significant differences in gender and academic discipline in the use of the internet to search for university information. In addition, four constructs of university information were identified that are perceived as important by students in their search behaviour: “university reputation”, “eligibility and affordability”, “teaching and learning” and “university tangibility”. The outcomes of this research provide some noteworthy insights which have numerous strategic digital marketing implications. Originality/value: While most existing studies have explored types of social media apps or online channels that prospective students use, little research has touched on students’ university choice factors in relation to the online environment. Responding to Constantinides and Zinck Stagno (2011) and Hemsley-Brown et al.’s (2016) call, this paper aims to address this research gap by investigating students’ university information search in relation to the online environment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies have found that social media marketing has a positive effect on customer retention (Hanaysha (2018) and also on purchase intention in the context of: hotels (Alansari et al., 2018), luxury fashion brands (Morra et al., 2018) and universities (Wong et al., 2018).”
From Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions (2021) · cites this paper as Wong et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
The Importance of the Normality Assumption in Large Public Health Data Sets
Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S., & Chen, L. (2002) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546 · Cited by 1,803
Determinants of E-Business Use in U.S. Firms
Hsu, P.-F., Kraemer, K. L., & Dunkle, D. (2006) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415100401 · Cited by 330
Cuadrado-García, M., Ruiz-Molina, M.-E., & Montoro-Pons, J. D. (2010) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.027 · Cited by 160
University students' Motivated Attention and use of regulation strategies on social media
Wu, J.-Y. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.016 · Cited by 62
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- 2011, Gender differences in consumers’ perception of online consumer reviews, Electronic Commerce Research, 11, 201, 10.1007/s10660-010-9072-y · DOI
- 2016, Antecedents and consequences of university brand identification, Journal of Business Research, 69, 3023, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.017 · DOI
- 2009, Social Media and College Admissions: The First Longitudinal Study
- 2010, Student recruitment marketing in South Africa – an exploratory study into the adoption of a relationship orientation, African Journal of Business Management, 4, 435
- 2009, My place or yours? Perceptions of, and selection choice criteria for, higher education institutions: the case of UK and Malaysian students, International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 1, 165, 10.1504/IJEBR.2009.024017 · DOI
- 2015, Predicting college students’ online information searching strategies based on epistemological, motivational, decision-related, and demographic variables, Computers & Education, 90, 54, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.002 · DOI
- 2012, From web analytics to digital marketing optimization: increasing the commercial value of digital analytics, Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 14, 30, 10.1057/dddmp.2012.20 · DOI
- 2011, SPSS: Analysis Without Anguish: Version 18 for Windows
- 1992, Statistical power analysis, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 98, 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783 · DOI · Paper page
- 2011, Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing: a segmentation study, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21, 7, 10.1080/08841241.2011.573593 · DOI
- 2005, Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1
- 2010, Toward an integrated framework for online consumer behavior and decision making process: a review, Psychology & Marketing, 27, 94, 10.1002/mar.20322 · DOI
- Education Bureau, 2016, The Government of the HKSAR
- 2013, Co-creation of value in higher education: using social network marketing in the recruitment of students, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35, 45, 10.1080/1360080X.2013.748524 · DOI
- 2011, We’re all connected: the power of the social media ecosystem, Business Horizons, 54, 265, 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007 · DOI
- 2006, Differences in actual and perceived online skills: the role of gender, Social Science Quarterly, 87, 432, 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x · DOI
- 2006, Universities in a competitive global marketplace: a systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19, 316, 10.1108/09513550610669176 · DOI
- 2016, Exploring brand identity, meaning, image, and reputation (BIMIR) in higher education: a special section, Journal of Business Research, 69, 3019, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.016 · DOI
- 2014, Gender differences in engineering students’ imagined futures, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20, 197, 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007079 · DOI
- 2000, Indonesian students’ perceptions of choice criteria in the selection of a tertiary institution: strategic implications, International Journal of Educational Management, 14, 40
- 2010, Facebook: an online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?, The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 179, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, An evaluation of web enhanced instruction in college level biology courses, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 533
- 2010, Opening up the road to nowhere: problems with the path to mass higher education in Hong Kong, Higher Education, 59, 167, 10.1007/s10734-009-9241-x · DOI
- 2007, Gender differences in online travel information search: implications for marketing communications on the internet, Tourism Management, 28, 423, 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.001 · DOI
- 1981, Developing marketing strategies and tactics in higher education through target market research, Decision Sciences, 12, 175, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1981.tb00074.x · DOI
- 1998, Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?, American Psychologist, 53, 1017, 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017 · DOI · Paper page
- 2013, A qualitative study of the factors influencing student choice: the case of public university in Indonesia, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3, 314
- 2013, The impact of student retention strategies: an empirical study, International Journal of Management in Education, 7, 22
- 1997, What are student education and educational related needs?, Marketing and Research Today, 25, 199
- 2007, Branding higher education: equivalence and difference in developing identity, Journal of Business Research, 60, 990, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.024 · DOI
- 1997, Perceived barriers to education and career: ethnic and gender differences, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 124, 10.1006/jvbe.1995.1536 · DOI
- 2011, Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies, Computers & Education, 56, 429, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004 · DOI
- 2006, University and course choice: Implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing, International Journal of Educational Management, 20, 466
- 2014, Consumer moments of truth in the digital context, Journal of Advertising Research, 54, 200, 10.2501/JAR-54-2-200-204 · DOI
- 2016, Strategic enrolment management (SEM) in self-financed higher education of Hong Kong: evaluation and measurement, Asia Pacific Education Review, 17, 161, 10.1007/s12564-016-9418-9 · DOI
- 2015, Factors affecting student satisfaction and performance gap in relation to the model of strategic enrolment, graduation and articulation (SEGA): the case of self-financing higher education in Hong Kong, The Public Administration and Policy, an Asia-Pacific Journal, 18, 27
- 2011, The dynamics of search engine marketing for tourist destinations, Journal of Travel Research, 50, 365, 10.1177/0047287510369558 · DOI
- 2003, Consumer information search behavior and the Internet, Psychology & Marketing, 20, 99, 10.1002/mar.10062 · DOI
- 2003, The influence of family on Thai students’ choices of international education, International Journal of Educational Management, 17, 211
- 2010, Findings on Facebook in higher education: a comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites, The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 134, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.002 · DOI
- 2016, Social media interaction, the university brand and recruitment performance, Journal of Business Research, 69, 3096, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.025 · DOI
- 2008, An investigation of differences in undergraduates’ academic use of the internet, Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 11, 10.1177/1469787407086744 · DOI
- 2005, Optimal search engine marketing strategy, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10, 9, 10.1080/10864415.2005.11043964 · DOI
- 2007, Reading habits and attitude in the digital age: analysis of gender and academic program differences in Malaysia, The Electronic Library, 25, 285, 10.1108/02640470710754805 · DOI
- 2002, Students’ preferences for university: a conjoint analysis, The International Journal of Educational Management, 16, 40
- 2001, Gender differences and the online classroom: male and female college students evaluate their experiences, Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 25, 805, 10.1080/106689201753235930 · DOI
- 2015, The engagement gap: exploring gender differences in university industry collaboration activities, Research Policy, 44, 1176
- 2012, University students’ online information searching strategies in different search contexts, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 881
- 2004, University selection: information requirements and importance, International Journal of Educational Management, 18, 160
- 2000, Critical success factors in online education, International Journal of Educational Management, 14, 216
- 2012, Computer mediated communication for social and academic purposes: Profiles of use and university students’ gratifications, Computers & Education, 58, 609, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.015 · DOI
- 2000, Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison, CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 167, 10.1089/109493100316012 · DOI
- 2016, Students’ choice of sub-degree programmes in self-financing higher education institutions in Hong Kong, Higher Education, 71, 455, 10.1007/s10734-015-9915-5 · DOI
- 2008, Gender differences in the usage and attitudes toward the internet among student teachers in a public Malaysian university, American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 689, 10.3844/ajassp.2008.689.697 · DOI
- 2005, Gender differences in online learning: sense of community, perceived learning and interpersonal interactions, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6, 31
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168 · Cited by 4,608
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, P., Lee, D., & M.L. Ng, P.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-04-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-524
- ISSN
- 0951-354X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794321947
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Management (publishedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Keywords
- prospective students, college choice, higher education recruitment, private higher education institutions, university reputation, digital marketing, gender differences, academic discipline differences, Hong Kong
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Online search for information about universities: a Hong Kong study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijem-12-2016-0268
- The paper
- Wong, P., Lee, D., & M.L. Ng, P. (2018). Online search for information about universities: a Hong Kong study. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-12-2016-0268