The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender and innovation: state of the art and a research agenda
Abstract
Abstract Purpose The purpose of this article is to present a framework for research on gender and innovation. The framework is developed based on a review of the current literature in the area; it is applied to provide a context for the articles in this special issue and to offer suggestions for future research. Design/methodology/approach The article relies on a literature review of gender and innovation. Additional literature searches on Scopus were conducted to provide an overview of the area. In addition, comparative analogies are sought from research fields of gender and entrepreneurship as well as gender and technology. Findings The article presents the scope and issues in the current research on gender and innovation. Based on the overview, research in this area is conducted in various disciplines applying a variety of methodological approaches. In order to make sense of the current research, the paper developed a framework consisting of various approaches to, gender and innovation; these include gender as a variable, construction and process and innovation as a result, process and discourse. Research limitations/implications Based on the review, several recommendations for future research are made. First, future research should question the connection between technology and innovation and purposefully seek innovation activity also in low-tech and service sectors and firms. Innovation scholars and policy makers should not primarily target radical and product innovations but should be equally interested in incremental and process innovations. Second, understanding women's innovation activity needs to be embedded in understanding the normative frames and structural factors at play. A particular theoretical call is linked to the study of power and innovation. Third, it is imperative to develop and apply new methodological approaches and new operationalizations of innovation and innovators. Practical implications By focusing on gender and innovation, it is possible to discover innovation as a gender biased phenomenon. Policy makers should bear this in mind when developing innovation policies. Social implications An understanding of innovation literature and innovation policy as gender biased has important social implications. Discovering gendered structures is important to further develop gender equal societies. Further, innovation may be hampered by biases in the understanding of the concept, including gender biases. Originality/value This introductory article puts forward a framework on gender and innovation that helps to make sense of the current state-of-the-art and to develop new research questions that need to be addressed for further theorising within the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006) · The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,506
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
(1934) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 7,609
The Oxford Handbook of Innovation
(2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001 · Cited by 5,922
The Science Question in Feminism
Harding, S. (1986) · Cornell University Press eBooks · Cited by 3,229
A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus
Shane, S. A. (2003) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,746
Sectoral systems of innovation and production
Malerba, F. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1 · Cited by 2,733
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., et al. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 · Cited by 2,552
Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions
Ahl, H. (2006) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x · Cited by 2,036
Hamel, G. (2001) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/s0737-6782(01)00097-2 · Cited by 1,648
Metadata
- Authors
- Agnete Alsos, G., Ljunggren, E., & Hytti, U.
- Venue
- International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-09-23
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 236-256
- ISSN
- 1756-6266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067714780
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 27.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender and innovation: state of the art and a research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijge-06-2013-0049
- The paper
- Agnete Alsos, G., Ljunggren, E., & Hytti, U. (2013). Gender and innovation: state of the art and a research agenda. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijge-06-2013-0049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.