Cited by 8Social Robot Interaction and HRIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Education

Opportunities and challenges of using socially intelligent agents: increasing interaction and school participation for children suffering from a long-term illness

Open access
Mårell-Olsson, Eva, Mejtoft, Thomas, Tovedal, Sofia, Söderström, Ulrik·2021·The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology

Abstract

Purpose: Children suffering from cancer or cardiovascular disease, who need extended periods of treatment in hospitals, are subjected to multiple hardships apart from the physical implications, for example, experienced isolation and disrupted social and academic development. This has negative effects long after the child's recovery from the illness. The purpose of this paper is to examine the non-medical needs of children suffering from a long-term illness, as well as research the field of artificial intelligence (AI) – more specifically, the use of socially intelligent agents (SIAs) – in order to study how technology can enhance children's interaction, participation and quality of life. Design/methodology/approach: Interviews were performed with experts in three fields: housing manager for hospitalized children, a professor in computing science and researcher in AI, and an engineer and developer at a tech company. Findings: It is important for children to be able to take control of the narrative by using an SIA to support the documentation of their period of illness, for example. This could serve as a way of processing emotions, documenting educational development or keeping a reference for later in life. The findings also show that the societal benefits of AI include automating mundane tasks and recognizing patterns. Originality/value: The originality of this study concerns the holistic approach of increasing the knowledge and understanding of these children's specific needs and challenges, particularly regarding their participation and interaction with teachers and friends at school, using an SIA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijilt-11-2020-0199

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Socially intelligent agents can address nonmedical needs in pediatric populations by reducing feelings of isolation, supporting coping, and facilitating participation in daily activities.

    “Mårell-Olsson et al [44] demonstrated that socially intelligent agents can address nonmedical needs in pediatric populations by reducing feelings of isolation, supporting coping, and facilitating participation in daily activities.”

    From Empathic AI for Patient-Centered Cancer Care: A Scoping Review of Patient Navigation, Support, and Clinical Practice (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Introduction and Discussion and conclusions identify isolation and school participation as nonmedical concerns for children with long-term illness. The paper also proposes SIAs as possible support for interaction and healthy coping. But its evidence comes from expert interviews, not a demonstration that SIAs reduced isolation or improved coping and daily participation in children; the Discussion says the small study cannot support generalizations. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Ahmad, M.I., Mubin, O., Shahid, S. and Orlando, J. (2019), "Robot's adaptive emotional feedback sustains children's social engagement and promotes their vocabulary learning: a long-term child-robot interaction study", Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 243-266, doi: 10.1177/ 1059712319844182. · DOI
  2. Al-Gamal, E. and Long, T. (2016), "Health-related quality of life and its association with self-esteem and fatigue among children diagnosed with cancer", Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 25, pp. 3391-3399, doi: 10.1111/jocn.13467. · DOI
  3. Amanatiadis, A., Kaburlasos, V.G., Dardani, C., Chatzichristofis, S.A. and Mitropoulos, A. (2020), "Social robots in special education: creating dynamic interactions for optimal experience", IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 39-45.
  4. Anthony, S., Selkirk, E., Sung, L., Klaassen, R.J., Dix, D., Scheinemann, K. and Klassen, A.F. (2014), "Considering quality of life for children with cancer: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures and the development of a conceptual model", Quality of Life Research, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 771-789.
  5. Bandura, A. (1982), "Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency", American Psychologist, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 122-147.
  6. Barakat, L.P., Kazak, A.E., Meadows, A.T., Casey, R., Meeske, K. and Stuber, M.L. (1997), "Families surviving childhood cancer -a comparison of posttraumatic stress symptoms with families of healthy children", Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 843-859.
  7. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B. and Tanaka, F. (2018), "Social robots for education: a review", Science Robotics, Vol. 3 No. 21, available at: https://robotics.sciencemag. org/content/3/21/eaat5954.
  8. Blusi, M. and Nieves, J.C. (2019), "Feasibility and acceptability of smart augmented reality assisting patients with medication pillbox self-management", Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 264, pp. 521-552.
  9. Breazeal, C. (2002), "Designing sociable machines -lessons learned", in Dautenhahn, K., Bond, A., Can~amero, L. and Edmonds, B. (Eds), Socially Intelligent Agents -Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots, pp. 156-493.
  10. Brown, L. and Howard, A. (2013), "Engaging children in math education using a socially interactive humanoid robot", 2013 13th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 183-188.
  11. Choudhury, A., Li, H., M Greene, C. and Perumalla, S. (2018), "Humanoid robot-application and influence", Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research, Vol. 2 No. 6, pp. 188-197.
  12. Creswell, J.W. (2013), Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd ed. (updated), SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  13. Cupit-Link, M., Syrjala, K.L. and Hashmi, S.K. (2018), "Damocles' syndrome revisited -update on the fear of cancer recurrence in the complex world of today's treatments and survivorship", Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 129-134.
  14. Dautenhahn, K. (2003), "Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy", Robotica, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 443-452.
  15. Dautenhahn, K., Bond, A.H., Canamero, L. and Edmonds, B. (Eds) (2002), Socially Intelligent Agents: Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots, Vol. 3, Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
  16. Davison, D.P., Wijnen, F.M., Charisi, V., van der Meij, J., Reidsma, D. and Evers, V. (2021), "Words of encouragement: how praise delivered by a social robot changes children's mindset for learning", Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, Vol. 15, pp. 61-76, doi: 10.1007/s12193-020-00353-9. · DOI
  17. Dignum, V. (2016), "Mind as a service: building socially intelligent agents", Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems XI, Vol. 9628, Springer International Publishing, pp. 119-133.
  18. Dignum, V. (2019), Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way, 1st ed., Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham.
  19. Ely, M. (1991), Doing Qualitative Research, Falmer Press, London.
  20. Ensk€ ar, K., Carlsson, M., Gols€ ater, M., Hamrin, E. and Kreuger, A. (1997), "Life situation and problems as reported by children with cancer and their parents", Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 18-26.
  21. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, pp. 695-727.
  22. Guerrero, E., Nieves, J.C. and Lindgren, H. (2016), "An activity-centric argumentation framework for assistive technology aimed at improving health", Argument and Computation, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 5-33.
  23. Halld en, G. (2003), "Barnperspektiv som ideologiskt och/eller metodologiskt begrepp (Child- perspective as an ideological and or methodological concept)", Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige (Pedagogical Research in Sweden), Vol. 8, pp. 12-23.
  24. Kaptelinin, V., Kuutti, K. and Bannon, L. (1995), "Activity theory -basic concepts and applications", International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer, pp. 189-201.
  25. Kiron, D. and Unruh, G. (2019), "Even if AI can cure loneliness -should it?", MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 1-4.
  26. Loveys, K., Fricchione, G., Kolappa, K., Sagar, M. and Broadbent, E. (2019), "Reducing patient loneliness with artificial agents: design insights from evolutionary neuropsychiatry", Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 21 No. 7, e13664.
  27. Luckin, R. (2018), Machine Learning and Human Intelligence -The Future of Education for the 21st Century, UCL Institute of Educational Press, London.
  28. Mattsson, A. (1972), "Long-term physical illness in childhood -a challenge to psychosocial adaptation", Pediatrics, Vol. 50 No. 5, pp. 801-881.
  29. Moinian, F. (2007), "Negotiating identities: exploring children's perspectives on themselves and their lives", Doctoral thesis, Teacher Education in Stockholm, Stockholm.
  30. Mulhern, R.K., Horowitz, M.E., Ochs, J., Friedman, A.G., ArmstrongCopeland, F.D.D. and Kun, L.E. (1989), "Assessment of quality of life among pediatric patients with cancer", Psychological Assessment: The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 1 No. 2, p. 130.
  31. Nardi, B. (Ed.), (1996) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  32. Serholt, S. (2017), "Child-robot interaction in education", PhD thesis, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
  33. van Dongen-Melman, J.E. (2000), "Developing psychosocial aftercare for children surviving cancer and their families", Acta Oncologica, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 23-31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mårell-Olsson, E., Mejtoft, T., Tovedal, S., & Söderström, U.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Mårell-Olsson, Eva
Venue
The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-08-10
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
393-411
ISSN
2056-4880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3190508212
Cited by
8
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Information and Learning Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
socially intelligent agents, childhood cancer, cardiovascular disease, social isolation, school participation, narrative control, emotional processing, educational documentation, quality of life, artificial intelligence in education, hospitalized children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review