Cited by 61Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender Diversity and Inequality

Sexual orientation discrimination in the Cypriot labour market: distastes or uncertainty?

Drydakis, Nick·2014·International Journal of Manpower

Abstract

Purpose: – Sexual orientation and employment bias is examined in Cyprus by implementing an experiment for the period 2010-2011. The design is aimed at answering three main questions. Do gay males and lesbians face occupational access constraints and entry wage bias than comparable heterosexuals? Do gay males and lesbians benefit from providing more job-related information? Does the differential treatment between gay male/lesbian and heterosexual applicants disappear as the information of the applicants increases? The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: – The author sent applications to advertised vacancies and experimented with two information sets the “sexual orientation” and “information” of the potential applicants. Findings: – The estimations suggest that gay male and lesbian applicants face significant bias than heterosexual applicants. Moreover, both heterosexual and gay male/lesbian applicants gain by providing more job-related information. However, the estimations suggest that the informational premium for sexual orientation minorities could not reduce the discriminatory patterns. Practical implications: – The current results indicate that discrimination against sexual orientation minorities in the Cypriot labour market is a matter of preference, not the result of limited information. One strategy the Cypriot government may employ is to try to affect public opinion and people's attitudes towards sexual orientation minorities. Originality/value: – This is the first nationwide field experiment in the Cypriot labour market and contributes to the literature as it is the first field study on sexual orientation which tries to disentangle statistical from taste-based discrimination in the labour market.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijm-02-2012-0026

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observed higher LGB+ discrimination in Asia is likely a spurious correlation because the Asian discrimination ratio is based on just one study from Cyprus.

    “However, we have reasons to believe that this is a spurious correlation: the discrimination ratio of the Asian region is based on just one study from Cyprus (Drydakis, 2014), which is part of Western Asia according to the United Nations M49 Standard classification to which we adhered.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drydakis, N.
Affiliations
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE)
Corresponding author
Drydakis, Nick
Venue
International Journal of Manpower
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-07-29
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
720-744
ISSN
0143-7720 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006393813
Cited by
61
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Manpower (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
Keywords
sexual orientation discrimination, employment discrimination, gay men, lesbians, sexual minorities, job applications, wage discrimination, taste discrimination, statistical discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review