Sexual orientation discrimination in the Cypriot labour market: distastes or uncertainty?
Abstract
Purpose: – Sexual orientation and employment bias is examined in Cyprus by implementing an experiment for the period 2010-2011. The design is aimed at answering three main questions. Do gay males and lesbians face occupational access constraints and entry wage bias than comparable heterosexuals? Do gay males and lesbians benefit from providing more job-related information? Does the differential treatment between gay male/lesbian and heterosexual applicants disappear as the information of the applicants increases? The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: – The author sent applications to advertised vacancies and experimented with two information sets the “sexual orientation” and “information” of the potential applicants. Findings: – The estimations suggest that gay male and lesbian applicants face significant bias than heterosexual applicants. Moreover, both heterosexual and gay male/lesbian applicants gain by providing more job-related information. However, the estimations suggest that the informational premium for sexual orientation minorities could not reduce the discriminatory patterns. Practical implications: – The current results indicate that discrimination against sexual orientation minorities in the Cypriot labour market is a matter of preference, not the result of limited information. One strategy the Cypriot government may employ is to try to affect public opinion and people's attitudes towards sexual orientation minorities. Originality/value: – This is the first nationwide field experiment in the Cypriot labour market and contributes to the literature as it is the first field study on sexual orientation which tries to disentangle statistical from taste-based discrimination in the labour market.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The observed higher LGB+ discrimination in Asia is likely a spurious correlation because the Asian discrimination ratio is based on just one study from Cyprus.
“However, we have reasons to believe that this is a spurious correlation: the discrimination ratio of the Asian region is based on just one study from Cyprus (Drydakis, 2014), which is part of Western Asia according to the United Nations M49 Standard classification to which we adhered.”
From The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments (2023) · cites this paper as Drydakis, 2014
Cites
Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400101 · Cited by 2,998 · see citing works
Ethnic Discrimination in Germany’s Labour Market: A Field Experiment
Kaas, L., & Manger, C. (2012) · German Economic Review · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00538.x · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Meta-analyzing the relationship between grades and job performance.
Roth, P. L., BeVier, C. A., Switzer, F. S., & Schippmann, J. S. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.548 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lippens, L., Vermeiren, S., & Baert, S. (2023) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104315
- Authors
- Drydakis, N.
- Affiliations
- IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Drydakis, Nick
- ORCID
- Drydakis, Nick
- Venue
- International Journal of Manpower
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2014-07-29
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 720-744
- ISSN
- 0143-7720 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006393813
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Manpower (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Keywords
- sexual orientation discrimination, employment discrimination, gay men, lesbians, sexual minorities, job applications, wage discrimination, taste discrimination, statistical discrimination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review