Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework
Open accessAI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review synthesizes multidisciplinary literature to identify the organizational resources needed to build AI capability in HRM, arguing that technical infrastructure alone is insufficient. It proposes an AI capability framework centred on non-technical resources and AI-employee integration, and offers research propositions to advance AI scholarship in HRM.
Key findings
- The review distilled five themes: AI applications in HRM, collective intelligence, AI and employment/skills, drivers to AI adoption, and barriers to AI adoption.
- Organizations need complementary non-technical resources—human skills and competencies, leadership, team coordination, culture, innovation mindset, governance, knowledge management, and AI-employee integration—alongside technical resources such as data, infrastructure, and AI transparency.
- The review process began with 14,376 records, removed 1,564 duplicates, screened 12,812 records, retained 216 after title/abstract screening, identified 72 eligible articles, added 12 through cross-referencing, and included 84 studies; 18 topics were grouped into five themes.
- The proposed framework integrates resource-based view, knowledge-based view, and knowledge management strategies to explain how organizational readiness and context of AI use shape business and employee outcomes.
Methods
- Systematic literature review following established protocols, searching SCOPUS and EBSCO across 98 journals ranked 3, 4, or 4* in the ABS Journal Guide 2020, spanning HRM, general management, international business, information management, and operations management; last search date June 2021.
- Used an R script to remove duplicates, Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modelling on titles and abstracts, team-based coding of topics, a document extraction table, and thematic synthesis to develop the AI capability framework.
- Final synthesis drew on 84 articles, organized into five research themes and used to propose research priorities and practical implications.
Limitations
- Stated: the review is limited to top-tier peer-reviewed journals (ABS 3–4*), so lower-ranked journals, non-peer-reviewed articles, and practitioner reports were excluded; the keyword and Boolean search may have missed relevant articles due to database unavailability or human error; future work should include Web of Science, DBLP, SSRN, SpringerLink, and law journals.
- Stated: selection of themes, research propositions, and resources relied on academic expert judgement and existing literature, so future studies should validate them with HR practitioners through interviews, Delphi studies, or AHP analysis.
- Evident: the framework is conceptual and not empirically tested in the paper; the conclusion reports reviewing 62 journals and 69 relevant articles, while the methodology reports 98 journals and 84 final articles, indicating an internal inconsistency in the reported review scope.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
43 of 206 cited sources checked · 17 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
AI can be useful to describe job requirements to attract the best suited candidates.
“AI can be useful to describe job requirements to attract the best suited candidates (Saling and Do, 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Saling and Do, 2020 source
- Premisecitation
AI can be useful to undertake sentiment analysis for employee motivation.
“and employee motivation (Saling and Do, 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Saling and Do, 2020 source
- Premisecitation
AI can forecast absenteeism.
“to forecast absenteeism (Araujo et al., 2019)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Araujo et al., 2019 source
- Premisecitation
AI can support hiring decisions through screening and matching profiles with job roles.
“to support hiring decisions through screening and matching profiles with job roles (Peeters et al., 2020, Saling andDo, 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Peeters et al., 2020 source
The Data and IT infrastructure section says AI can be used in models that predict applicant performance or advise a recruiter whom to hire. The Introduction describes people analytics matching employees to vacancies, but does not say AI performed that matching; the paper also does not describe AI screening job candidates. Its mention of transaction screening concerns the work of a department, not hiring. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Saling andDo, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
AI can be combined with agent-based simulation to predict the overall situation of human resource development over time in a company to identify potential changes in recruitment strategies, the effect of promotion and development conditions, and the proportion of leavers under defined conditions.
“AI can be combined with agent-based simulation to predict the overall situation of human resource development over time in a company to identify potential changes in recruitment strategies, the effect of promotion and development conditions, and the proportion of leavers under the conditions defined for the company (Pashkevich et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pashkevich et al., 2019 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
AI algorithms designed for human resource planning require well-structured decision objectives to provide good solutions.
“AI algorithms designed for human resource planning require well-structured decision objectives to provide good solutions (Meechang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Meechang et al., 2020 source
The Introduction and §2.1 describe a review of human acceptance of IT for disaster risk management, not AI algorithms for human resource planning. Searches for human resource planning, AI algorithms, and decision objectives found no passage addressing whether well-structured objectives are needed to produce good solutions. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Reliance on digital quantitative data from which AI algorithms learn raises significant questions about the quality of the recruitment process.
“However, this raises significant questions about quality of the process itself, in particular an epistemological issue regarding the reliance on digital quantitative data from which the AI algorithms learn (Faraj et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Faraj et al., 2018 source
The Discussion & Conclusion (p. 11) questions decisions based primarily on digital data because they exclude qualitative, complex factors. Anticipatory quantification (pp. 4–5) likewise questions whether quantified data adequately represent people. The paper mentions algorithmic recruitment in Augmenting Coordination (p. 10), but does not specifically assess how this reliance affects the quality of recruitment processes. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Learning algorithms are reductionist in nature as they use predictive modelling based solely on correlational analysis of measured dimensions, thus reducing the individual to only those measured criteria.
“Further, learning algorithms are reductionist in nature as they use predictive modelling based solely on correlational analysis of measured dimensions, thus reducing the individual to only those measured criterion (Faraj et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Faraj et al., 2018 source
In “Anticipatory quantification” (p. 5), the paper says predictive modelling builds on correlational analysis and that individuals may be reduced to measured dimensions. It says learning algorithms *can* be reductionist and calls that reduction a *possible* impact; it does not say they rely solely on correlational analysis. The citing sentence makes those points categorical. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
RBV is appropriate as a theoretical lens for developing distinctive and hard-to-imitate capabilities, such as AI implementation, in a turbulent and technology-driven business environment.
“The existing literature has also demonstrated appropriateness of RBV to be applied as a theoretical lens for developing distinctive and hard-to-imitate capabilities (such as AI implementation) in a turbulent and technology-driven business environment (Bromiley and Du, 2016;Mikalef and Gupta, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bromiley and Du, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Mikalef and Gupta, 2021 source
- Premisecitation
Successful AI implementation can only be fully achieved when there is acceptance from decision-makers for its use.
“which supports the claim that successful AI implementation can only be fully achieved when there is an acceptance from decisionmakers for its use (Cao et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Cao et al., 2021 source
- Premisecitation
Limited transparency and explainability of output responses generated by AI systems has emerged as a key barrier to experiencing anticipated benefits by confidently turning data-centric decisions into effective actionable strategies.
“Limited transparency and explainability of output responses generated by the AI systems has emerged as a key barrier to experiencing anticipated benefits by confidently turning data-centric decisions into effective actionable strategies (Shin and Park, 2019;Makarius et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Shin and Park, 2019 source
- cites Makarius et al., 2020 source
Section 2.1 says transparent, explainable AI is difficult to build, and Section 5 raises questions about trusting AI output and understanding how it was produced. The Introduction also notes that organizations often fail to realize anticipated AI benefits. The paper does not specifically establish limited explainability of output as a key barrier to turning data-centric decisions into actionable strategies; pages are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
One of the core issues regarding use of algorithms in making key organisational decisions is the inscrutability of the decision-making process.
“One of the core issues regarding the use of algorithms in making key organisational decisions is the inscrutability of the decision-making process that the algorithm engages with to arrive at the outcome (Faraj et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Faraj et al., 2018 source
- Premisecitation
AI adoption in HRM leads to process efficiency, letting employees focus on non-trivial tasks requiring business expertise and creative intellect.
“(1) process efficiency, which will let employees focus on non-trivial tasks requiring their business expertise and creative intellect (Mikalef and Gupta, 2021);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mikalef and Gupta, 2021 source
Section 3.4 says AI can automate time-consuming manual processes and free people to engage in creative work; it also links AI to improved operational efficiency. The paper discusses these effects across organizations, not specifically AI adoption in HRM, and says sustained freeing of staff requires deployment beyond the experimental stage. Pages are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
These impacts are likely to result in negative perception, skepticism, and psychological detachment with regards to AI adoption and implementation.
“All of these are likely to result in negative perception, skepticism, and psychological detachment with regards to AI adoption and implementation (Makarius et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Makarius et al., 2020 source
Section 2.3 (page unavailable) says employees may be skeptical of AI because they fear job replacement, and the Discussion (page unavailable) describes negative perceptions of AI. Section 4.1 links fear of replacement to cynicism and lower organizational commitment, but the copy does not establish psychological detachment specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Research on AI-human collaboration is less developed in the management literature, except Makarius et al, 2020 reporting an AI socialisation theoretical framework.
“Research on this theme is less developed in the management literature, except Makarius et al, 2020 reporting an AI socialisation theoretical framework.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Makarius et al, 2020 source
- Findingcitation
The human-AI interaction within the work environment is a less understood phenomenon considering cognitive, relational and structural complexities related to AI replacing human tasks.
“The human-AI interaction within the work environment is a less understood phenomenon considering the cognitive (AI context of use), relational (factors impacting AIemployee integration) and structural complexities (organisational strategy and innovation ecosystem) related to AI replacing human tasks (Makarius et al., 2020;Kaplan and Haenlein, 2020;Syam and Sharma, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Tacit AI experience is a critical resource to enhance organisational dynamic capability and employees' trust, skills, and job clarity.
“Therefore, managers must develop a process to identify tacit AI experience within the organisation, which according to KBV is a critical resource to enhance organisational dynamic capability and employees' trust, skills, and job clarity (according to Makarius et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Makarius et al., 2020 source
Section 4.1 (page unavailable) recommends assessing employees’ pre-entry knowledge of AI and providing training; Section 4.2 links AI integration to trust, task mastery, and role clarity. The paper does not identify tacit AI experience as the critical resource that enhances all those outcomes, nor does it establish a link to organisational dynamic capability. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingreasoning
There is a gap in literature empirically examining the organisational resources required to develop firm-specific and hard-to-imitate AI capabilities.
“there is a gap in literature empirically examining the organisational resources that are required to develop firm-specific and hard-to-imitate AI capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Research studies examining AI transparency and its impact on workplace trust is extremely limited in HRM literature.
“The findings from our review shows that research studies examining the domain of AI transparency and its impact on workplace trust is extremely limited in the HRM literature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Research studies are yet to examine adoption of AI within SMEs, considering constraints such as access to finance, human resource skills, flattened HR structure, resource constraints and limited knowledge management tools.
“research studies are yet to examine adoption of AI within SMEs, and considering various constraints faced by these enterprises such as access to finance, human resource skills and flattened HR structure, resource constraints and limited knowledge management tools.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
With advances in technological and algorithmic innovations, the problem has shifted from collecting huge volumes of data, turning data into knowledge and conclusions, to understanding how AI algorithms generate these conclusions.
“we also find that with advances in technological and algorithmic innovations, the problem has shifted from collecting huge volumes of data, turning data into knowledge and conclusions (Kersting and Meyer, 2018), to understanding how AI algorithms generate these conclusions (Gulliford and Dixon, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kersting and Meyer, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gulliford and Dixon, 2019 source
- Findingreasoning
The anticipated benefits of AI in HRM processes and practices can be realised by developing collective intelligence capability within the business organisation.
“our review had identified that the anticipated benefits of AI in HRM processes and practices can be realised by developing collective intelligence capability within the business organisation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AI recruitment is increasingly more efficient at finding and hiring high quality staff than wholly human centred recruitment.
“AI recruitment has become increasingly more efficient at finding and hiring high quality staff than wholly human centred recruitment (Black and Van Esch, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Black and Van Esch, 2020 source
- Premisecitation
AI can be useful to undertake sentiment analysis for monitoring new employees joining the company.
“to undertake sentiment analysis for monitoring new employees joining the company (Kakkar and Kaushik, 2019)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kakkar and Kaushik, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
AI implementation plans dropped from 20% in 2019 to 4% in 2020.
“AI implementation plans had dropped from 20% in 2019 to 4% in 2020 (The Economist, 2020;Deloitte, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites The Economist, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Deloitte, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Many companies have failed to experience anticipated organisationally valued outcomes from AI adoption despite investing time, effort, and resources.
“recent studies have found that organisations are yet to experience the anticipated benefits from AI adoption, despite investing time, effort, and resources.”
- Also stated in: § Citation · plain
“the existing literature has found that many companies have failed to experience anticipated organisationally valued outcomes (Canhoto and Clear, 2020;Fountaine et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Canhoto and Clear, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Fountaine et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Citation · plain
- Premisecitation
The use of AI allows several prediction tasks for recruitment, selection, on-boarding, training, performance management, advancement, retention, and employee benefits.
“Tambe et al. (2019) show that the use of AI allows several prediction tasks for recruitment, selection, on-boarding, training, performance management, advancement, retention, and employee benefits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tambe et al. (2019) source
- Interpretationreasoning
Organisations need complementary non-technical organisational resources, not just technical infrastructure, to achieve organisationally valued outcomes from AI.
“Our findings show that organisations need to think beyond technical resources, and focus on developing non-technical ones such as human skills and competencies, leadership, team co-ordination, organisational culture and innovation mindset, governance strategy, and most importantly AI-employee integration strategy.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“why complementary organisational resources and not just technical infrastructure are essential to achieve organisationally valued outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Popular press and technology vendors have overinflated expectations about benefits and drivers to AI adoption and implementation.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Premisecitation
A recent survey by Boston Consulting Group and MIT found that seven out of ten AI projects generated limited business impact.
“A recent survey (by Boston Consulting Group and MIT) which was conducted with executives found that the seven out of ten AI projects generated limited impact (business value)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites The Economist, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Deloitte, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
AI can improve retention through predictions at the individual level.
“to improve retention through predictions at the individual level (Saling andDo, 2020, Kshetri, 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Saling andDo, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kshetri, 2020 source
- Premisecitation
AI skills bridge the gap between application of AI in a specific business context and managing the implementation.
“These skills bridge the gap between application of AI in a specific business context (how and why it should be used) and managing the implementation (clarity about how business processes, and human tasks will change) (Wilson et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilson et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
AI can reduce bias when screening candidates.
“Although it can also reduce bias when screening candidates (Belhadi et al., 2021, Gaur andRiaz, 2019)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Belhadi et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gaur andRiaz, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The growth of digitized sharing and gig economy innovating existing business models has led to the emergence of a digital workforce using digital technologies to accomplish their work role and responsibilities.
“The growth of digitized sharing and gig economy innovating existing business models has led to the emergence of digital workforce using digital technologies to accomplish their work role and responsibilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Schroeder et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wilson et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Use of AI for monitoring can boost employee retention by analyzing social media data to identify employees interested in leaving and introducing interventions to prevent them from leaving.
“The use of AI for monitoring can also boost employee retention by analyzing social media data to identify employees interested on leaving and introducing interventions to prevent them from leaving the company (Gaur and Riaz, 2019)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gaur and Riaz, 2019 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Developing AI skills and expertise among human workers will minimize friction and potential forces of inertia that could delay adoption of AI and impede business value.
“Developing AI skills and expertise among the human workers will minimize the friction and potential forces of inertia, which could delay the adoption of AI, and impede business value.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Technical and business skills necessary for each of the roles are two crucial components to drive AI adoption in organisations.
“The technical and business skills necessary for each of the roles outlined above are two crucial components to drive AI adoption in organisations (Bharadwaj, 2000;Ravichandran et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
AI can support decision-making for team formation.
“and to support decision-making for team formation (La Torre et al., 2021)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites La Torre et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Knowledge sharing strategies and efforts will decrease skepticism among human employees by promoting awareness and better understanding of AI systems, and AI-human role articulations.
“Knowledge sharing strategies and efforts will decrease skepticism among human employees by promoting awareness and better understanding of AI systems, and AI-human role articulations (Klein and Polin, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klein and Polin, 2012 source
- Premisecitation
Management of AI competencies, skills and knowledge is considered an asset for organisations that can be supported using AI.
“The management of these competencies, skills and knowledge is considered an asset for organisations that can be supported using AI (Younis and Adel, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Younis and Adel, 2020 source
- Interpretationcitation
AI socialisation among human workers can achieve AI-employee collaboration.
“This can be achieved through AI socialisation among the human workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Use of AI socialization faces several questions and challenges often centred around human perceptions of AI teammates, such as teammate aesthetic, division of labour and accountability.
“However, the use of AI socialization faces several questions and challenges often centred around human perceptions of the AI teammates (Zhang et al 2021), such as teammate aesthetic, the division of labour and accountability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al 2021 source
- Interpretationnone given
HR practitioners need certain AI skills and knowledge to effectively use the technology to its capacity.
“HR practitioners need to have certain AI skills and knowledge to effectively use the technology to its capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Transparency can be disconnected from power.
“This may not always be the case, as identified by Crain, 2018, whereby transparency can be disconnected from power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crain, 2018 source
- Premisecitation
Organizational leadership, strategy, resource capacity and human resource capability can facilitate restructuring business operations to deal with unprecedented events.
“Studies have also highlighted the was organizational leadership, strategy, resource capacity and human resource capability can facilitate restructuring business operations to deal with unprecedented events (Ambulkar et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ambulkar et al., 2015 source
- Interpretationcitation
Transparency in the decision-making process is another barrier to AI adoption.
“Another barrier is related to transparency in the decisionmaking process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
AI adoption in HRM leads to customer satisfaction by proactively understanding their needs, preferences and experiences.
“(4) customer satisfaction by proactively understanding their needs, preferences and both positive and negative experiences (Davenport and Ronanki, 2018);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davenport and Ronanki, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Type of AI, context of use, and psychological investment of human employees will lead to several benefits enhancing both organisational and employee productivity.
“Finally, type of AI, context of use, and psychological investment of human employees will lead to several benefits enhancing both organisational and employee productivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
KBV does not specify mechanisms to share knowledge that will promote and satisfy individual-level outcomes related to AI.
“However, KBV does not specify mechanisms to share knowledge that will promote and satisfy individual-level outcomes (and in this case related to AI).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Even if an algorithm were designed by the firm for its own purpose, the learning capability of the algorithm eventually makes it impossible to discern how the decision was reached.
“Further, even if the algorithm were designed by the firm for its own purpose, the learning capability of the algorithm eventually makes it impossible to discern the process of how the decision was reached.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Humans become gatekeepers leveraging the potential from AI to use the findings in the most appropriate way, thereby augmenting decision-making.
“In this way, humans become gatekeepers leveraging the potential from AI (Wang et al., 2021) to use the findings in the most appropriate way, thereby augmenting decision-making.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Investment on technology alone is unlikely to result in business gains.
“This underscores the need to adopt a holistic outlook to develop AI capability in the organisations as investment on technology alone is unlikely to result in business gains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In data-driven decision-making, business managers do not know how AI-based ML algorithms generate outputs because the algorithm is either proprietary or the mathematical computational models are very complex to understand.
“In the context of data-driven decision-making, the issue with explainability is that business managers do not know how AI-based machine learning (ML) algorithms generate the outputs by processing the input data because the algorithm is either proprietary or that the mathematical computational models used in the algorithm are very complex to understand (Shin and Park, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shin and Park, 2019 source
- Premisecitation
The inherent lack of transparency in AI decision making makes organisational agents hesitant about using AI for important decisions.
“This lack of transparency is echoed by other scholars who argue that the inherent lack of transparency in the process of decision making by AI, makes organisational agents hesitant about using AI for important decisions (Schmidt et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt et al., 2020 source
- Premisecitation
Organisations often find it difficult to integrate AI systems with existing human workers, processes and business strategy.
“organisations often find it difficult to integrate AI systems with existing human workers, processes and business strategy (Deloitte, 2017)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deloitte, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The complexity of incorporating uncertainty in the environment and the inability to accurately predict human behavior represents a challenge for the predictive capabilities of AI.
“The complexity of incorporating uncertainty in the environment (e.g., the COVID-19 contingency) and the inability to accurately predict human behavior represents a challenge for the predictive capabilities of AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AI adoption in HRM leads to generating hidden patterns and unlocking useful insights from big data facilitating data-driven decision-making efficiently.
“(2) generating hidden patterns and unlocking useful insights from big data facilitating data-driven decision-making efficiently ((Lichtenthaler, 2019);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lichtenthaler, 2019 source
- Premisecitation
Majority of organisations have failed to experience the anticipated value from AI systems.
“majority of the organisations have failed to experience the anticipated value (The Economist, 2020 andDeloitte, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites The Economist, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Deloitte, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Even if auditing were applied to such algorithms, understanding them would be limited to a select professional class of knowledge workers with highly specialized skills and technical training.
“Even if auditing were to be applied to such algorithms, understanding them would be limited only to a select professional class of knowledge workers with highly specialized skills and technical training for comprehending code of immense size and logical complexity (Dourish, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dourish, 2016 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Internal resources satisfying VRIN within an organisation, and not just technical resources, can facilitate enhancing capabilities, competencies, and business competitiveness to adopt, implement, deploy, and evolve AI-based solutions.
“These theoretical perspective helps to holistically understand how internal resources (satisfying the valuable, rare, inimitable, non-substitutable, VRIN in short) within an organisation and not just technical resources can facilitate enhancing capabilities, competencies, and business competitiveness to adopt, implement, deploy, and evolve AI-based solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This inscrutability of the algorithm lends itself to an inherent lack of transparency in the use of AI within the organisational context.
“This inscrutability of the algorithm lends itself to an inherent lack of transparency in the use of AI within the organisational context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Adoption of AI-enabled solutions within HRM will change the organisation's business model, processes, and practices.
“Adoption of AI-enabled solutions within HRM will change the organisation's business model, processes, and practices, which we have identified throughout the review.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Leadership and senior management enhance the innovation capability of organisations for achieving competitive advantage.
“our review has discussed the role of leadership and senior management to enhance the innovation capability of organisations for achieving competitive advantage (Lei et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lei et al., 2021 source
- Premisecitation
In emerging markets, most formal jobs are generated by SMEs, which create 7 out of 10 jobs.
“In emerging markets, most formal jobs are generated by SMEs, which create 7 out of 10 jobs (World Bank, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Bank, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
AI-employee collaboration is likely to be facilitated by tacit experience within organisations-implicit knowledge sharing communicated by employees with prior understanding of AI and experience working with AI systems.
“Fourthly, AI-employee collaboration is likely to be facilitated by tacit experience (Leonard and Sensiper, 1998) within the organisations, i.e., implicit knowledge sharing which is communicated by employees having prior understanding of AI and experience working with AI systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leonard and Sensiper, 1998 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The framework provides a holistic understanding of all resources necessary to make organisations strategize AI adoption.
“Therefore, the framework provides a holistic understanding of all resources necessary to make organisations strategize AI adoption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The dedication and engagement of managers and top-level management is a strong contributor towards AI adoption.
“The dedication and engagement of managers as well as top-level management will be a strong contributor towards AI adoption (Davnport and Ronanki, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davnport and Ronanki, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Developing employee-AI trust by embedding transparency in AI algorithms will facilitate better understanding and confidence in AI system.
“Therefore, developing employee-AI trust by embedding transparency in AI algorithms will facilitate better understanding and confidence in AI system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
AI transparency can aid in identifying and resolving flaws within ML models stemming from improper training datasets, wrong settings, configurations and hyperparameters, and overfitting or underfitting models, which will enhance the value offered by these AI-based systems.
“Furthermore, AI transparency can also aid in identifying and resolving flaws within ML models stemming from improper training datasets (input issues), wrong settings, configurations and hyperparameters (algorithmic issues), and overfitting or underfitting models, which will enhance the value offered by these AI-based systems (Chowdhury et al., 2020;Satell and Sutton, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chowdhury et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Satell and Sutton, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 98
- May combine two claims. 80
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI in recruitment has the potential for fast resume scanning, quickly and automatically responding to candidate queries, and virtual recruitment activities.
“Baakeel (2020) examined the use of AI in recruitment, and found the potential for fast resume scanning, quickly and automatically responding candidate's queries, and virtual recruitment activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Baakeel (2020) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI is valuable in HR decision-making because of the potential to avoid subjectivity, with more objective decisions guided by information extracted through employee data mining.
“AI is valuable in HR decision-making (case in point employees) because of the potential to avoid subjectivity, with more objective decisions guided by the information extracted through employee data mining (Chornous and Gura, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Chornous and Gura, 2020 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI-driven HR analytics allows organisations to develop workforce capability, improve teamwork, support flexible working, and improve performance measurement.
“This will allow organisations to develop the capability of workforce, improve teamwork, support flexible working and improve performance measurement (Chornous and Gura, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Chornous and Gura, 2020 source
The Materials and Methodology section describes using workforce analytics for training and development and evaluating employees’ potential productivity. The Results section discusses HR metrics and reporting, which supports the performance-measurement part. Neither section establishes that these tools improve teamwork or support flexible working. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThere is currently no single universally accepted definition of AI throughout the literature.
“there is currently no single universally accepted definition throughout the literature, which leads to a fundamental problem of coherent understanding of AI (Mikalef and Gupta, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mikalef and Gupta, 2021 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUse of AI for monitoring can boost employee retention by analyzing financial data for payment and motivating personnel based on compensation.
“and also analyzing financial data for payment and motivating personnel based on compensation (Kulkov, 2021)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kulkov, 2021 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAI-employee collaboration can help organisations achieve competitive advantage.
“The recent theoretical framework building on the tenets of socio-technical systems theory and organisational socialisation framework by Makarius et al., 2020 integrating AI with employee within the business organisations has discussed the role of AI as a collaborator (new employee), where AI-employee collaboration can help the organisations to achieve competitive advantage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Makarius et al., 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI teammates would be involved in complex problem solving: defining a problem, identifying root causes, proposing and evaluating solutions, choosing among options, making plans, taking actions, learning from past interactions, and participating in after-action reviews.
“AI teammates 'would be involved in complex problem solving: defining a problem, identifying root causes, proposing, and evaluating solutions, choosing among options, making plans, taking actions, learning from past interactions, and participating in after-action reviews' (Seeber et al, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Seeber et al, 2020 source
The Abstract lists exactly these steps in a complex problem-solving process. It says effective machine teammates would need to engage in “at least some” of them, whereas the citing sentence omits that qualifier and can imply involvement in every listed step. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI socialisation will enhance employees' ability to trust, use and adopt AI, productivity, and career satisfaction.
“These will enhance ability of employees to trust, use and adopt AI, productivity, and career satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Makarius et al., 2020 source
Section 4.2 (page unavailable) says that understanding an AI system’s purpose and process can enhance employee trust, while section 4.4 predicts greater productivity from successful AI integration. Section 4.4 says understanding AI can influence career satisfaction, but does not say it will improve it. The paper presents these outcomes as expectations or possibilities, not assured effects. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI skills and expertise provide organisations with capability to innovate, re-engineer and optimise both business processes and resources efficiently, and therefore can enhance their ability to dynamically adapt and remain responsive.
“The skills and expertise provide the organisations with capability to innovate, re-engineer and optimise both business processes and resources, efficiently, and therefore can their ability to dynamically adapt and remain responsive (Mikalef et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mikalef et al., 2020 source
Section 2.1 identifies technical and managerial skills as important to deriving value from big data analytics, while section 3 links analytics-derived insights to faster, more effective responses to change. But the paper addresses big data analytics rather than AI skills specifically, and section 6.2 says insight alone is insufficient: organizational action and flexibility are also required to achieve responsiveness. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEffective AI teammates require more than social robots and digital assistants.
“Seeber et al (2020) went further and suggested that effective AI teammates required more than social robots and digital assistants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Seeber et al (2020) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAppropriate implementation of AI to support recruitment and retention can be essential to enhance employer brand and reputation.
“Kot et al. (2021) argue that the appropriate implementation of AI to support recruitment and retention can be essential to enhance employer brand and reputation as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kot et al., 2021 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIf handled appropriately, AI can offer well-being benefits, including building well-being awareness, measuring well-being and the impact of interventions and changes, managing AI risk on well-being, supporting positive well-being initiatives, and providing employers insight into employee work-life-balance.
“If handled appropriately, AI can offer a number of well-being benefits.For example, building well-being awareness, measuring well-being and the impact of interventions and changes, managing any AI risk on well-being, supporting positive well-being initiatives and providing employers insight into employee work-life-balance (Schiff et al, 2020.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Schiff et al, 2020 source
Section C, “Benefits of a well-being orientation” (page unavailable), supports building awareness, measuring impacts, managing AI-related risks, and improving well-being through AI design. It describes these as benefits of adopting a well-being orientation to AI, rather than benefits AI itself provides, and does not say that AI gives employers insight into employees’ work-life balance. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSeveral decisions made by humans are based on judgement and intuition.
“In fact, several of the decisions made by humans are based on judgement and intuition (Meechang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Meechang et al., 2020 source
Section 2.1 discusses models of human behavior, and section 4.6 describes reliance on past experience in disaster preparedness. Neither passage says that human decisions are based on judgment and intuition; searches for that phrase and a paraphrase found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn AI algorithm might identify a relevant criterion or relationship affecting successful integration of employees into the company, but that relationship may not be evident for decision-makers, which could question the reliability of the results.
“An AI algorithm might identify a relevant criteria or relationship between criterion affecting the successful integration of employees into the company.However, that relationship may not be evident for decision-makers, which could question the reliability of the results (Meechang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Meechang et al., 2020 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe predictive capacity of AI can be hindered by challenges to accurately describe the complexity of human behavior and the effect of unknown external effects affecting the conditions of the environment and the company itself.
“The predictive capacity of AI can be hindered by the challenges to accurately describe the complexity of human behavior (Pashkevich et al., 2019) and the effect of unknown external effects affecting the conditions of the environment and the company itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pashkevich et al., 2019 source
Section 4.1 (Prediction Ability; page unavailable) reports weak predictive ability for some forklift fuel-consumption measures and says more explanatory variables could improve it. Section 5 (Discussion; page unavailable) identifies driver behavior as a significant factor. The paper does not say that difficulty accurately describing complex human behavior hinders AI prediction; the sentence’s uncited claim about unknown external effects is outside this verdict. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI adoption in HRM leads to social performance by reducing human subjective bias in HR processes such as recruitment and employee appraisal, and improving employee experience and working conditions.
“(6) social performance by reducing human subjective bias in HR processes such as recruitment and employee appraisal, and improving employee experience and working conditions by analysing enterprise social media anonymous data (Toniolo et al., 2020);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Toniolo et al., 2020 source
The Social sustainability section says AI can reduce recruitment bias through standardized candidate assessment and that reduced workload can improve working conditions and employee well-being. It does not support the more specific claims about bias in employee appraisal or improving employee experience and working conditions by analysing anonymous enterprise social-media data. It describes these effects as possibilities, rather than establishing that AI adoption leads to them. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSkills and expertise provide organisations with capability to innovate, re-engineer and optimise both business processes and resources, efficiently, and therefore can their ability to dynamically adapt and remain responsive.
“The skills and expertise provide the organisations with capability to innovate, re-engineer and optimise both business processes and resources, efficiently, and therefore can their ability to dynamically adapt and remain responsive (Mikalef et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mikalef et al., 2020 source
Section 2.1 says technical and managerial skills are required to derive value from big data, and Section 2.3 links organizational capabilities to efficient resource use, innovation, and reconfiguration in response to change. But Section 6.2 says knowledge alone is insufficient: responsiveness also requires organizational flexibility and action. The claim overstates what skills and expertise by themselves provide. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationConsidering the new set of skills and capabilities needed for managers, employees, and AI to collaborate, there will be a necessity to redesign jobs, create new ones, transform business model and strategies.
“Considering the new set of skills and capabilities needed for managers, employees, and AI to collaborate, there will be a necessity to redesign jobs, create new ones, transform business model and strategies (Toniolo et al., 2020;WambaTaguimdje et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Toniolo et al., 2020 source
The Social sustainability section says AI requires greater skills for remaining tasks, can support human–machine collaboration, and is changing employees’ roles. The Introduction and §1.3 say AI affects business models and strategy. The copy does not state that AI will necessitate creating new jobs; it discusses replacing jobs and moving workers into different roles instead. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites WambaTaguimdje et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe aim of these reports is to minimize potential risks faced by organisations with regards to using AI and simultaneously protect the interests of business users.
“The aim here is to minimize potential risks faced by organisations with regards to using AI and simultaneously protect the interests of business users (and/or whose data is collected) (Arrieta et al., 2020;Coombs et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Arrieta et al., 2020 source
Section 6.2.2 (p. 40) says AI impact assessments should identify and minimize potential negative impacts, and that audit reports can contribute to trustworthiness. Section 6.3.3 (p. 42) calls for protecting the privacy of people whose data is used. The paper does not specifically describe these reports as minimizing risks faced by organizations or protecting the interests of business users. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Coombs et al., 2020 source
In the ‘Critical review of the literature and future research agenda,’ the paper discusses organisations’ legal liability for AI decisions and recommends governance to protect vulnerable people affected by automated decisions (page not provided). It does not establish that the aim of the reports mentioned in the citing sentence is to minimise organisational risks while protecting business users or people whose data is collected. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEffective collaboration between human intelligence and AI will help to unlock the real potential of digital technology to solve pressing business and societal challenges, and this will require careful crafting of a strategy to re-define and recategorize existing jobs, by considering the skills-gap.
“The authors have concluded that effective collaboration between human intelligence and AI will help to unlock the real potential of digital technology to solve pressing business and societal challenges, and this will require careful crafting of a strategy to re-define and recategorize existing jobs, by considering the skills-gap.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Malone, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Caputo et al., 2019 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is a lack of both understanding and knowhow on best practices to effectively develop collaborative intelligence capability.
“there is a lack of both understanding as well as knowhow on the best practices to effectively develop collaborative intelligence capability (Amabile, 2020;Ciechanowski et al., 2020;Makarius et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Amabile, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ciechanowski et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Makarius et al., 2020 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe adoption of AI within HRM processes and wider organisation will impact employees in different ways, such as job substitution, training needs, uncertainty regarding roles and responsibilities, limited understanding about how and why AI will be used, trust and confidence, formation of project teams where AI and HI co-exist, and concerns about career progression and development.
“Our review found that the adoption of AI within HRM processes and wider organisation will impact employees in different ways, such as job substitution, training needs, and uncertainty regarding roles and responsibilities (Frey & Osborne, 2017), limited understanding about how and why AI will be used (Raisch & Krakowski, 2020), trust and confidence (Gunning, 2017), formation of project teams where”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Frey & Osborne, 2017 source
- cites Raisch & Krakowski, 2020 source
The citation is attached specifically to employees’ limited understanding of how and why AI will be used. The Discussion (page not available) calls for scholars to better understand AI in management and discusses transparency, but does not say employees have that limited understanding. Searches for employee understanding, AI-use purposes, and explainability found no passage addressing the attributed point. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Gunning, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExisting research studies have indicated the importance of AI-human collaboration, which has emerged as a new research theme in the literature.
“The existing research studies have indicated the importance of AI-human collaboration (Fleming, 2019, Makarius et al., 2020), which has emerged as a new research theme in the literature (Murray et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationEvaluating internal expertise helps identify employees with technical and/or non-technical knowledge to use AI, understand business processes and functions that can benefit, and how benefits will serve both employees' and organisational goals/priorities.
“Evaluating the internal expertise will help to identify employees having knowledge (technical and/or non-technical) to use AI, understand business processes and functions which can benefit, and how the benefits will serve both employees' and organisational goals/priorities (Mikalef and Gupta, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mikalef and Gupta, 2021 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExisting research has identified that collective intelligence-a symbiotic partnership between AI and human intelligence-increases the capability of human workers, leading to higher employee productivity, better psychological outcomes, low turnover, and improved quality of outputs.
“In this context, existing research has identified the importance of collective intelligence, i.e., symbiotic partnership between AI and HI, and how this will also increase the capability of human workers, which will lead to higher employee productivity, better psychological outcomes, low turn-over and improved quality of outputs (Glikson and Wooley, 2020;Murray et al., 2020;von Krogh, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe existing literature reports different types of AI systems within business organisations, including automated, assisted, augmented, and autonomous intelligence.
“The existing literature has reported different types of AI systems within business organisations (Haenlein and Kaplan, 2019;Daugherty et al., 2019;Davenport and Bean, 2017): 1) automated intelligence, which involves automating routine and manual tasks, so that human workers can spend more time in non-trivial complex tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Haenlein and Kaplan, 2019 source
- cites Daugherty et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Davenport and Bean, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe review showed the importance of understanding complementary organisational resources required to benefit from AI adoption in HRM, and exploring beyond data and technological resources.
“Our review showed the importance of understanding complementary organisational resources required to benefit from AI adoption in HRM, and exploring beyond the data and technological resources (Mikalef and Gupa, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mikalef and Gupa, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataAutonomous intelligence is not included because the authors have not come across an AI system in HRM that can function without human involvement.
“We have not included autonomous intelligence because we are yet to come across such an AI system in HRM, which can function without any human involvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRecent reports published by the European Commission have emphasised ethical and moral aspects surrounding AI, which has led to responsible development and use of AI.
“We found that recent reports published by the European Commission have emphasised on ethical and moral aspects surrounding AI, which has led to responsible development and use of AI (European Commission 2019a and2019b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites European Commission 2019a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites European Commission 2019b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenMost studies reported in the literature and including HRM focus on multinational large organisations.
“Finally, most studies reported in the literature and including HRM focus on multinational large organisations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThere is a knowledge gap and limited understanding in HRM literature on factors that will influence AI-employee collaboration and its potential business impact.
“The knowledge gap and our limited understanding exists in the HRM literature on the factors that will influence AI-employee collaboration, and the potential business impact of this collaboration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenMany studies have reported the drivers and barriers related to adoption and implementation of AI.
“While, many studies have reported the drivers and barriers related to adoption and implementation of AI, we consolidate these to propose AI capability theoretical framework.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataThe review identified five key themes in the literature: AI applications in HRM; collective intelligence; AI employment and skills; AI drivers and barriers to adoption.
“The review has identified five key themes in the literature: AI applications in HRM; collective intelligence; AI employment and skills; AI drivers and barriers to adoption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenCollective intelligence is nascent and emerging within academic research.
“However, collective intelligence is nascent and emerging within academic research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe current literature primarily has focused on the applications of AI in HRM, anticipated benefits, impact of AI on jobs, and AI-driven decision-making augmenting human intelligence.
“We found that the current literature primarily has focussed on the applications of AI in HRM, anticipated benefits, impact of AI on jobs, and AI-driven decision-making augmenting human intelligence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIM has primarily focussed on technical resources and infrastructure, and wider BAM research has focussed on non-technical resources.
“While, IM has primarily focussed on technical resources and infrastructure, and wider BAM research has focussed on non-technical resources, our capability framework objectively brings these two rather fragmented pieces of literature together (Loebbecke & Picot, 2015;Markus, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Loebbecke & Picot, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Markus, 2015 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAI has significant potential to support organizational research because of its capacity to analyze data and support decision-making.
“AI has a significant potential to support organizational research because of the capacity to analyze data and support decision-making.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI can be used for various aspects of recruitment, including selecting applicants from a pool of submitted applications, making appointment decisions based on interview and organisational need, and proposing suitable salary and benefits based on qualifications.
“Based on the model proposed by Mehrabad and Brojeny (2007), it can be used to select applicants from a pool of submitted applications (selection), make a decision based on the interview and organisational need (appointment) and propose a suitable salary and benefits based on their qualifications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mehrabad and Brojeny (2007) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe systematic review followed a protocol to ensure the review process is transparent, easily reproducible, and critically analyses and systematises research themes.
“We conducted a systematic review of literature following the protocol suggested in the existing literature (Tranfield et al., 2003;Denyer and Tranfield, 2009;Wolfswinkel et al., 2013;Hopp et al., 2018) to ensure that the review process is transparent, easily reproducible, and critically analyses and systematises research themes (stemming from the review).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Tranfield et al., 2003 source
- cites Denyer and Tranfield, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wolfswinkel et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningDeveloping collective intelligence, a collaborative working environment where AI and human intelligence can co-exist, is important for organisations.
“our review sheds light on the importance of developing collective intelligence within the organisations, i.e., a collaborative working environment where AI and human intelligence (HI) can co-exist”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe review process was transparent, reproducible, and devoid of human errors.
“Following the recommendations in Tranfield et al. 2003, this process ensured that the procedure is transparent, reproducible, and devoid of human errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tranfield et al. 2003 source
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAI recruitment decreases the time taken to recruit individuals, enables organisations to respond to events more quickly, and improves competitive advantage through better recruited people.
“AI recruitment decreases the time taken to recruit individuals, enables organisations to respond to events more quickly and ultimately improve their competitive advantage through intangible assets of better recruited people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe use of technology to support HR has significant potential to support business strategy.
“The use of technology to support HR has significant potential to support the business strategy (Kakkar and Kaushik, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kakkar and Kaushik, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI can identify personality traits from potential candidates and match them to the predominant traits found in the culture of the company.
“to identify personality traits from potential candidates and match them to the predominant traits found in the culture of the company (Lee and Ahn, 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee and Ahn, 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStrategic focus for AI-driven HR analytics needs to be contextualised within the organisation, rather than a more generic strategic focus.
“Sparrow, et.al. (2015) argue that this strategic focus needs to be contextualised within the organisation, rather than a more generic strategic focus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sparrow, et.al. (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe research team used individual coding followed by group consensus to finalize the key themes emerging from the study.
“This was initially done individually by each researcher and then consensus was reached through a group discussion to finalize the key themes emerging from the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll documents were verified by each team member to ensure information consistency with the literature and coverage of all relevant information.
“Next, all these documents were verified by each team member to ensure that the information is consistent with the literature and covered all relevant information (e.g., study protocol, or strategic implications relevant to our research question).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI can access a larger pool of candidates and reduce bias by eliminating subjective criteria.
“to access a larger pool of candidates and reduce bias eliminating subjective criteria (Kshetri, 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kshetri, 2020 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOrganisations often find it difficult to integrate AI within their business processes and systems, which often inhibits AI adoption.
“research has found that organisations often find it difficult to integrate AI within their business processes and systems, which often inhibits AI adoption (Davenport and Ronanki, 2018;Mikalef., et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Davenport and Ronanki, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Mikalef., et al., 2019 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe digital workforce will significantly impact organisational processes, nature and meaning of work, work design structure, competencies and skills, technology exposure, employer and employee expectations, work practices, and HR strategy to bridge the skills gap to increase employee motivation and productivity, leading to business productivity.
“This will significantly impact the organisational processes, nature and meaning of work, work design structure within organisations, competencies and skills required in specific roles within the digital workforce, technology exposure, employer and employee expectations, work practices within the organisation and human resource strategy to bridge the skills gap to increase employee motivation and”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Schroeder et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wilson et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHumans often reject and ignore a new technology if they feel threatened by it, irrespective of their interest and enthusiasm in it.
“The IM literature has reported that humans often reject and ignore a new technology, if they feel threatened by it (i.e., affects their financial and psychological wellbeing), irrespective of their interest and enthusiasm in it (Elkins et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Elkins et al., 2013 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI algorithms can be combined with data envelopment analysis to identify underperforming employees, their impact on efficiency and effectiveness of the company, and overall performance of the organization.
“AI algorithms can be combined with techniques such as data envelopment analysis to identify underperforming employees, their impact on the efficiency and effectiveness of the company, and the overall performance of the organization (Panteia, 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Panteia, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe intelligence of humans and machines can be considered as the intertwining of 'collective' intelligence.
“The idea was first discussed by Malone (2018), who considered the intelligence of humans and that of machines as the intertwining of 'collective' intelligence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Malone (2018)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenPotential benefits of AI-employee collaboration established through a symbiotic partnership can be fully realised in practice only if employees understand, trust, and adopt AI.
“However, potential benefits of such AI-employee collaboration established through a symbiotic partnership can be fully realised in practice (and beyond the theoretical narratives), if employees (human workers) understand, trust, and adopt AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationClarification about the limits and advantages of AI will help organizations successfully integrate AI in the human working environment.
“Furthermore, clarification about the limits and advantages of AI will help organizations to successfully integrate AI in human working environment (Malone, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Malone, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAI can be used for knowledge engineering that can aid knowledge searching and knowledge processes.
“Tsui et al., 2000 put forward how AI can be used for knowledge engineering that can aid knowledge searching and knowledge processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tsui et al., 2000 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor recruiting, AI can help writing job profiles, screening resumes, using enhanced video analysis to identify behavioral patterns of potential candidates, comparing them with criteria required for the position, and identifying traits and skills of potential candidates to facilitate adaptation and enhance performance.
“For recruiting, AI can help writing job profiles, screening resumes, using enhanced video analysis to identify behavioral patterns of potential candidates, comparing them with the criteria required for the position (Belhadi et al., 2021), and identifying traits and skills of potential candidates to facilitate adaptation and enhance performance (Wilson and Gosiewska, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Belhadi et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wilson and Gosiewska, 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationcitationLimited knowledge, skills and understanding among the workforce about AI capabilities, limitations, strategic initiatives, and integration with existing business processes can be attributed to organisations not augmenting human intelligence or replacing employees with AI expert systems.
“This can be attributed to limited knowledge, skills and understanding among the workforce (both employees and managers) about AI capabilities, limitations, strategic initiatives, and integration with the existing business processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationComputational power and analytical capabilities of AI can be leveraged to deal with complexity in decision-making, with the intention to augment human intelligence and decision-making tasks rather than replacing humans.
“Jarrahi (2018) has suggested that the computational power and analytical capabilities of AI can be leveraged to deal with the complexity in decision-making process, with the intention to augmenting human intelligence (HI) and decision-making tasks, rather than replacing human from the process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jarrahi (2018) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAI could be used to highlight knowledge hiding.
“Abubakar et al (2019) showed how AI could be used to highlight knowledge hiding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abubakar et al (2019) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI achieves flexibility, autonomy, creativity, innovation, and streamlined processes by automating trivial manual repetitive processes that require considerable time and human capital.
“This is achieved by automating trivial manual repetitive processes that require considerable time and human capital.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI-enabled systems will both automate and augment HRM decision-making in organisations.
“AI-enabled systems will both automate and augment HRM decision-making in organisations, which has been a subject of both attention and fear among the corporate leaders (Janssen et al, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Janssen et al, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFear of job losses and obscurity about AI-human responsibilities in a collaborative working environment will prevent organizations from concretizing AI adoption.
“Fear of job losses and obscurity about AI-human responsibilities in a collaborative working environment will prevent organizations to concretize AI Adoption (Bughin, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bughin, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough organisations have acknowledged potential benefits offered by AI adoption, they are yet to augment human intelligence or replace employees with AI expert systems.
“Barro and Davenport, 2019 have argued that although organisations have acknowledged the potential benefits offered by AI adoption, they are yet to augment human intelligence or replace employees with AI expert systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barro and Davenport, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI capabilities can improve and optimize business operations and resources through task automation and augmenting human intelligence, which will reduce operational costs, lead production time, improve throughput, enhance creative process by freeing up employees' time to concentrate on non-trivial and complex procedures, resulting in performance gains.
“AI capabilities can improve and optimize business operations and resources through task automation and augmenting human intelligence, which will reduce operational costs, lead production time, improve output/delivery response time (throughput), enhance creative process within organisations by freeing up employees' time to concentrate on non-trivial and complex procedures, resulting in performance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Deb at al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Mishra and Pani, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wamba-Taguimdje et al., 2020 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAI skills will be a strategic intangible resource that is difficult to imitate by other firms, providing competitive advantage.
“Therefore, these skills will be strategic intangible resource that will be difficult to imitate by other firms, which will provide competitive advantage (Barney, 1991).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barney, 1991 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI can provide more flexibility and work-related autonomy, promote creativity and innovation, and allow streamlining of organizational processes.
“AI can provide more flexibility and work-related autonomy, promote creativity and innovation, and allow to streamline organizational processes (Malik et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Malik et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUse of AI within business organisations is likely to increase the number of employees, rather than job losses, because early adopters of AI are positioning themselves for growth which will stimulate employment.
“Bughin (2018) has discussed how the use of AI within business organisations is likely to increase the number of employees, rather than job losses, because the early adopters of AI are positioning themselves for growth which will stimulate employment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bughin (2018)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAI enhanced knowledge management by facilitating effective knowledge sharing.
“For example, Liebowitz (2001), reported how AI enhanced knowledge management by facilitating effective knowledge sharing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liebowitz (2001) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI can be useful for monitoring, performance measurement and tracking employee morale.
“Additionally, AI can be useful for monitoring, performance measurement and tracking employee morale (Gaur and Riaz, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gaur and Riaz, 2019 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMajor drivers for adoption of AI-enabled systems include the potential to be more objective, less likely to make mistakes, and the ability to predict future behavior through identification of patterns in historical datasets.
“Major drivers identified in the literature for the adoption of AI-enabled systems include the potential to be more objective, less likely to make mistakes, and the ability to predict future behavior through the identification of patterns in the historical datasets (Giermindl et al., 2021, Gaur andRiaz, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Giermindl et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gaur andRiaz, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAugmentation of AI in any job context will boost decision-making abilities of employees, increase time devoted to non-trivial tasks, heighten creativity, and enhance both employee and business productivity.
“Such augmentation in any job context will boost the decision-making abilities of employees, increase the time devoted for non-trivial tasks, heighten creativity, and therefore enhance both employee and business productivity (Wilson and Daugherty, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilson and Daugherty, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe source of bias in AI is associated with the bias of the people implementing the AI.
“This is important because it highlights that the source of bias in AI is associated to the bias of the people implementing the AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenHR recruiters are relying on meta data available on social media outlets to target potential candidates for roles within organisations.
“Case in point the HR recruiters are relying on the meta data available on social media outlets to target potential candidates for roles within organisations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe interpretability of results from AI and the potential clash with the human perspective can hinder successful implementation of AI.
“Therefore, the interpretability of results from AI and the potential clash with the human perspective can hinder the successful implementation of AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOwnership of the AI algorithm and its results may be placed on HR managers, and as such they would need to know the rationale for the data input choices and results.
“Ownership of the AI algorithm and its results may be placed on HR managers, and as such they would need to know the rationale for the data input choices and results (Davenport and Ronanki, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davenport and Ronanki, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningFor recruitment and hiring, the core components of the organizational culture must be clearly delimited to obtain useful results.
“For recruitment and hiring, this means that the core components of the organizational culture must be clearly delimited to obtain useful results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIf users or HR managers do not understand algorithms' affordances and variants, this can result in an inability to use the algorithms effectively to recruit and retain the best possible staff and to be swayed by prejudice.
“If users or HR managers do not understand the algorithms' affordances and variants, this can result in an inability to use the algorithms effectively to recruit and retain the best possible staff and to be swayed by prejudice (Chowdhury et al., 2020;Shin and Park, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chowdhury et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Shin and Park, 2019 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAll these drivers will reduce bottlenecks and improve overall operational efficiency, which will enhance business productivity.
“All these drivers will reduce bottlenecks and improve overall operational efficiency, which will enhance business productivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOrganizational resilience involves the capacity to absorb, respond and transform to capitalize on disruptions that threaten the organization.
“Organizational resilience involves the capacity to absorb, respond and transform to capitalize on disruptions that threaten the organization (Lengnick-Hall et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lengnick-Hall et al., 2011 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningQuantification has become a substitute for an individual's social life, personality, abilities and choices, attributes upon which recruitment decisions are being made.
“This quantification has become a substitute for an individual's social life, personality, abilities and choices, attributes upon which recruitment decisions are being made.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTransparency is particularly necessary in a HR context.
“There are several reasons why transparency is particularly necessary in a HR context (Chowdhury et al., 2020;Silvernam, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chowdhury et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Silvernam, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSociety has become dominated with the logic of quantification due to lowering costs and easy access to the digital world and the ease of processing vast amounts of meta data.
“The lowering of costs and easy access to the digital world, coupled with relative ease with which vast amounts of meta data can be processed, society is has become dominated with the logic of quantification (Espeland and Stevens, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Espeland and Stevens, 2008 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIT adoption, such as AI-enabled systems, within organisations will enhance dynamic capabilities which drives market capitalization, increased flexibility to adapt or re-engineer business operations and processes, agility, and responsiveness to address uncertain and evolving market demands and mitigate trade-offs within the organisation.
“The existing research has also indicated that IT adoption (such AI-enabled systems) within organisations will enhance dynamic capabilities which drives market capitalization, increased flexibility to adapt/re-engineer business operations and processes, agility, and responsiveness to address uncertain and evolving market demands and mitigate trade-offs within the organisation (Mikalef and Pateli, 2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mikalef and Pateli, 2017 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCompanies are failing to tackle the SDGs because of limited visibility, flexibility and resilience.
“Despite the recent investment on social responsibility programs, the general consensus is that companies are failing to tackle the SDGs because of limited visibility, flexibility and resilience (Bag et al., 2021a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bag et al., 2021a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationResilient organisations often rely on changes in corporate culture and re-design of processes.
“Resilient organisations often rely on changes on the corporate culture and re-design of processes (Bag et al., 2021a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bag et al., 2021a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA company must promote the development of skills that employees can use to support the organization's capacity to withstand disruptions through HR management that ensures human resources are managed effectively and employed at the right time and conditions.
“Hence, the company must promote the development of skills that can use by employees to support the capacity of the organization to withstand disruptions through the introduction of HR management able to ensure human resources are managed effectively and that they can be employed at the right time and in the right conditions to help the company manage different circumstances (Slusarczyk, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Slusarczyk, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrivacy and data protection concerns, issues stemming from constant tracking, and the potential of bias in algorithms themselves are important barriers to AI adoption.
“On top of that, Giermindl et al. (2021) and Malik et al. (2021) highlight the importance of privacy and data protection concerns, issues stemming from constant tracking, and the potential of bias in the algorithms themselves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Giermindl et al. (2021)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Malik et al. (2021)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSustainable human resource management aims at accomplishing organizational sustainability supported by the design of HR policies, strategies and practices simultaneously underpinning social, environmental, and economic aspects.
“This has led to the development of sustainable human resource management, which aims at accomplishing organizational sustainability supported by the design of HR policies, strategies and practices simultaneously underpinning social, environmental, and economic aspects (Wesley Ricardo de Souza et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wesley Ricardo de Souza et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningGrowing developments and usage of AI in everyday life and organisations has resulted in a need for HRM to consider the role and impact of AI on the well-being of employees.
“Growing developments and usage of AI in everyday life and organisations has resulted in a need for HRM to consider the role and impact of AI on the well-being of employees.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTechnology has been related to sustainable human resource management.
“Considering the importance of leveraging technology to increase the productivity of human resources to support sustainable development (Reddy et al., 2019), technology has been related to sustainable human resource management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Reddy et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zhou, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOrganizational resilience is valuable to help businesses plan, prepare, strategize operations, and respond to unpredictable disruptions and efficiently recover from such disruptions.
“Organizational resilience is valuable to help businesses plan, prepare, strategize operations, and respond to unpredictable disruptions and efficiently recover from such disruptions (Scholten et al., 2019, Macdonald et al., 2018, Bag et al., 2021b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Scholten et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Macdonald et al., 2018 source
- cites Bag et al., 2021b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenFor HR recruitment, the decision-making process of targeting potential candidates and taking them through rudimentary checks is accelerated using AI.
“Particularly for HR recruitment the decision-making process of targeting potential candidates and taking them through the rudimentary checks, is accelerated using AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOther barriers to AI adoption include assessing data quality to ensure decisions and recommendations are precise, accurate and relevant; optimal training dataset to reduce bias and reputational risks; integrating existing systems with AI implementation; developing a data-centric culture; and technology turbulence.
“Other barriers include, assessing the data quality to ensure the decisions and recommendations are precise, accurate and relevant (Ransbotham, et al., 2020;Kiron and Schrage, 2019); optimal training dataset to reduce bias and reputational risks (Chowdhury et al., 2020;Glikson and Woolley, 2020); integrating existing systems with the AI implementation, to streamline information processing and”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ransbotham, et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Kiron and Schrage, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Chowdhury et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCertain groups have been found to be disproportionately disadvantaged in AI algorithms, e.g., black faces associated as gorillas and Asian people categorised as blinking.
“Certain groups have been found to be disproportionality disadvantaged in AI algorithms, e.g., black faces associated as gorillas (Dougherty, 2015) and Asian people categorised as blinking (Wade, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dougherty, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wade, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenUse of AI powered by algorithms provides HR recruitment with efficient tools to both market jobs to an increasingly digitally based candidate and perform rudimentary initial checks before candidates can be interviewed.
“Use of AI powered by the algorithms provides HR recruitment with efficient tools to both market jobs to an increasingly digitally based candidate and perform the rudimentary initial checks before candidates can be interviewed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUsing AI to predict vulnerable employees and make adjustments has the potential of increasing the safety of the workforce and the sustainability of jobs in the long term.
“This has the potential of increasing the safety of the workforce and the sustainability of jobs in the long term”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe impact of these barriers in practice can be significant.
“The impact of these barriers in practice can be significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdoption of AI for HRM faces four major challenges: complexity of HR phenomena, small data, ethical constraints, and reaction of employees to the implementation of AI.
“Tambe et al. (2019)argues that the adoption of AI for HRM faces four major challenges, namely the complexity of the HR phenomena, small data, ethical constraints, and the reaction of employees to the implementation of artificial intelligence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tambe et al. (2019) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIssues such as bias, misinformation, lack of understanding, intrusion, inequality and labour displacement may impact employees' well-being and their feelings of security, trust and privacy.
“Issues such as bias (Chouldechova et al., 2018), misinformation (Little, 2018;Chesney and Citron, 2019), lack of understanding, intrusion, inequality (Buolamwini and Gebwu, 2018) and labour displacement (Autor, 2015) may impact on employees' well-being and their feelings of security, trust and privacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chouldechova et al., 2018
- cites Little, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Chesney and Citron, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKnowledge sharing is a key practice to create business value that will enhance economic performance of business organisations.
“Drawing from the knowledge management literature, knowledge sharing has been identified by Hansen et al. (1999) as a key practice to create business value that will enhance economic performance of business organisations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hansen et al. (1999)
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReducing individuals to a set of measured dimensions avoids dealing with a person's evolution and alternative explorations that may explain how one ends up in a specific category.
“Thus, reducing individuals to a set of measured dimensions and avoiding dealing with a person's evolution and alternative explorations that may explain how one ends up in specific category (Ananny, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ananny, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationcitationThere would be a demographic divide in openness to AI.
“which would suggest that there would be a demographic divide in openness to AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe capability of AI needs to be combined with the capacity of humans to empathize and understand the results within the global, organizational, and personal context.
“Therefore, the capability of AI needs to be combined with the capacity of humans to empathize and understand the results within the global, organizational, and personal context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI has the potential to identify areas of lower performance based on employee achievements, but it would struggle to process the underpinning factors leading to low performance and therefore could interpret a need for action in instances that may be temporary or affected by external variables.
“For instance, AI has the potential to identify areas of lower performance based on the achievements of employees, but it would struggle to process the underpinning factors leading to low performance and therefore it could interpret a need for action in instances that may be temporary or affected by external variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: AI has shortcomings in creative and social intelligence.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the context of AI knowledge sharing, codification will facilitate scaling up knowledge dissemination across the organisation and re-using the knowledge, and personalization will promote trust and cooperative attitude of employees towards AI through networking and discussion.
“Therefore, in the context of AI knowledge sharing, codification will facilitate scaling up the knowledge dissemination across the organisation and re-using the knowledge, and personalization will promote trust and cooperative attitude of employees towards AI, through networking and discussion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI adoption in HRM leads to developing successful business cases related to AI implementation which will enhance reputation among business stakeholders, competitors, policy makers and consumers.
“(8) developing successful business cases related to AI implementation which will enhance reputation among the business stakeholders, competitors, policy makers and consumers (Davenport and Ronanki, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davenport and Ronanki, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAll of these will lead to developing a culture which fosters creativity, innovation capability, collaboration between teams, less resistance to change and conducive to the needs of human workers.
“All of these will lead to developing a culture which fosters creativity, innovation capability, collaboration between teams, less resistance to change and conducive to the needs of human workers (where their human attributes such as intuitive intelligence, empathy, negotiation, and communication skills are acknowledged).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe context will determine the type of AI (automation, augmentation and assisted).
“We envisage the context will determine type of AI (automation, augmentation and assisted).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI adoption in HRM leads to introducing new products and services, improving quality of existing ones, positively impacting operational performance and costs through optimising resource utilization.
“(3) introducing new products and services, improving the quality of existing ones positively impacting operational performance and costs in terms of inventory management through optimising resource utilization (Wamba-Taguimdje et al., 2020;Alsheibani et al., 2020);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wamba-Taguimdje et al., 2020 source
- cites Alsheibani et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth codification and personalization strategies have been used to build expertise and facilitate skills development in platform ecosystems and IT sectors.
“Both codification and personalization strategies have been used to build expertise and facilitate skills development in the context of platform ecosystems (Tiwana, 2013) and IT sectors (Garavelli et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Tiwana, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Garavelli et al., 2002 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe impact on employees will depend on the type of AI, which processes will be transformed, AI strategy of the organisation, and knowledge creation, sharing and management mechanisms.
“The impact on employees will depend on the type of AI, which processes will be transformed, AI strategy of the organisation, knowledge creation, sharing and management mechanisms to develop skills, knowledge, and expertise of employees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe context of use depends on the business problem and priority.
“The context of use will depend on the business problem and priority.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBig tech companies design algorithms that contribute to their success, but these algorithms are closely guarded and protected as intellectual property.
“For example, big tech companies like Facebook, Google and Amazon design algorithms that contributes to their success, however, these algorithms are closely guarded and protected as intellectual property (O'Neil, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites O'Neil, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKBV posits that knowledge created within the organisation is a critical asset which will help to produce sustainable competitive advantage in dynamic market environments because knowledge-based sources are socially complex, difficult to imitate, and continuously evolve and are co-created within the organisation.
“It is often considered as an extension of the RBV theory, and posits that knowledge created within the organisation is a critical asset which will help to produce sustainable competitive advantage in dynamic market environments because: (1) knowledge-based sources are socially complex to understand and embedded within the firm; (2) difficult to imitate by another organisation; (3) continuously”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grant, 1996 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOrganisational resources determine organisational readiness to utilize AI and how it will be used.
“The organisational resources will determine the organisational readiness to utilize AI (i.e., resources that need financial investment and time to develop) and how it will be used (i.e., context which will lead to business process transformation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRBV is one of the most widely applied theoretical perspectives to explain how resources within an organisation can help enhance business performance and competitiveness.
“RBV is one of the most widely applied theoretical perspectives to explain how resources within an organisation can help enhance business performance and competitiveness (Barney, 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barney, 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningOverreliance on AI decisions regarding targeted recruitment and following recruitment processes is a concern.
“This inevitably raises questions about overreliance on AI decisions regarding targeted recruitment and following recruitment processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe development of skills and expertise in-house will provide role clarity in a collaborative AI-HI working environment, develop trust and confidence among human workers, and enhance their emotional engagement with AI.
“The development of skills and expertise in-house will provide role clarity in a collaborative AI-HI working environment, develop trust and confidence among the human workers, which will enhance their emotional engagement with AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLeadership helps to develop appropriate conditions, strategies, and resources within the organisation, which allow employees to harness new skills, facilitate access to relevant knowledge and expertise base, and encourage sharing this knowledge with peers.
“It also helps to develop appropriate conditions, strategies, and resources within the organisation, which will allow the employees to harness new skills building on existing knowledge, facilitate access to relevant knowledge and expertise base, and finally encourage on sharing this knowledge with peers (Alsheibani et al., 2020;Demlehner & Laumer, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Alsheibani et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Demlehner & Laumer, 2020
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLeadership plays an important role to intellectually stimulate employees' ability to perform their tasks and embrace change, through career development programmes.
“Leadership plays an important role to intellectually stimulate employees' ability to perform their tasks and embrace change, through career development programmes (Nguyen and Mohamed, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen and Mohamed, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAI can be considered as an innovative technology and organisational leadership will play a critical role to develop facilitating conditions to deploy, manage and evolve AI.
“Therefore, AI can be considered as an innovative technology and organisational leadership will play a critical role to develop facilitating conditions to deploy, manage and evolve AI (Alsheibani et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alsheibani et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationData analysis, digital, complex cognitive, decision-making, and continuous learning skills are necessary for AI adoption in multinational corporations in India.
“A recent study has reported that data analysis, digital, complex cognitive, decision-making, and continuous learning skills are necessary for AI adoption in multinational corporations in India (Jaiswal et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaiswal et al., 2021 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe adoption of AI within HRM will vary according to geographical regions and industry sectors.
“we believe that the adoption of AI within HRM will also vary according to geographical regions (developed and developing economies) and industry sectors (such as manufacturing, construction, services, education creative industry and tourism) (Vrontis et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vrontis et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAI-HI collaboration will inherently change organisational structure, roles and responsibilities and teams.
“AI-HI collaboration will inherently change organisational structure, roles and responsibilities and teams.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to World Bank, SMEs represent about 90% of businesses and more than 50% of employment worldwide, and play a major role in job creation and global economic development.
“According to world bank, SMEs represent about 90% of businesses and more than 50% of employment worldwide, and therefore play a major role in job creation and global economic development (World Bank, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Bank, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA supportive culture within organisations enhances motivation and commitment of employees to embrace innovative ideas, processes and strategies, helping organisations to dynamically adapt and evolve.
“Such environment helps to create a supportive culture within the organisations that will enhance motivation and commitment of the employees to embrace innovative ideas, processes and strategies, helping the organisations to dynamically adapt and evolve (Lei et al., 2020;Al-Husseini et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lei et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Al-Husseini et al., 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCross-country/cross-sector comparisons will bring new insights from International HRM perspective.
“crosscountry/cross-sector comparisons will bring new insights from International HRM perspective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe management of competencies, skills and knowledge is considered an asset for organisations that can be supported using AI.
“the management of these competencies, skills and knowledge is considered an asset for organisations that can be supported using AI (Younis and Adel, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Younis and Adel, 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAI systems will influence organizational structural issues in a variety of areas.
“Organizational structural issues will be influenced by AI systems in a variety of areas that are yet to be examined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKnowledge management practices in organisations lead to knowledge integration and evolution which enhance organisational dynamic capability and business competitiveness.
“research has shown that knowledge management practices (sharing, creation, co-creation, storage etc.) in the organisations will lead to knowledge integration and evolution which will enhance organisational dynamic capability and business competitiveness (Kearns and Sabherwal, 2006;Nickerson and Zenger, 2004;Grant, 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious studies have shown the decisive role of leadership in developing and shaping a positive culture within organisations, which is conducive to introducing, implementing, and managing innovation.
“previous studies have also shown the decisive role of leadership to developing and shaping a positive culture within the organisations, which is conducive to introducing, implementing, and managing innovation within the organisations (Le and Lei, 2019;Le, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Le and Lei, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Le, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenThe AI capability framework will help organisations assess their readiness to leverage AI-based systems.
“The capability framework will help organisations assess their readiness to leverage AI-based systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationCommitment from organisations' senior management (leadership) is required to enhance employee development, job satisfaction, and workforce performance.
“Such communication mechanisms and strategy dissemination initiatives will require commitment from organisations' senior management (leadership) to enhance employee development, job satisfaction and workforce performance (Alsheibani et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alsheibani et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe ability to get explanations for output responses will reduce biases in business processes, operations, and decision-making, thus enhancing fairness.
“The ability to get explanations for the output responses will also reduce biases in business processes, operations, and decision-making, thus enhancing fairness (Satell and Sutton, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Satell and Sutton, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe AI capability framework helps objectively identify both technical and non-technical resources required to operationalise AI systems.
“In doing so the framework will help to objectively identify both technical and non-technical resources required to operationalise AI systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI is a technology and its adoption, implementation, and impact within HRM will depend on other resources and organisational strategies operationalising and governing these resources.
“On the contrary, AI is a technology and its adoption, implementation, and impact within HRM will depend on other resources and organisational strategies operationalising and governing these resources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis will be the pathway to augmenting human intelligence, rather than replacing it entirely within HRM decision-making processes.
“This will be the pathway to augmenting human intelligence, rather than replacing it entirely within HRM decision-making processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationInnovative culture stimulates employees to embrace AI, identify and seize new opportunities to use AI through their creative intellect, and dynamically respond to change resulting from HR business process and practice transformation, which helps enhance business productivity and competitiveness.
“In this context, our review shows that innovative culture will stimulate employees to embrace AI, identify and seize new opportunities to use AI through their creative intellect, and dynamically respond to change resulting from HR business process and practice transformation, which will help to enhance business productivity and competitiveness (Brock and Von Wangenheim, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brock and Von Wangenheim, 2019 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIn the review, the authors relied on the judgement of academic experts and the existing academic literature to select the trending themes of AI research in HRM, research propositions, and resources to develop AI capability within organisations.
“Finally, while, in this review we relied on the judgement of academic experts and the existing academic literature to select the trending themes of AI research in HRM, research propositions (i.e., underresearched and emerging areas in the field), and resources to develop AI capability within organisations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe review's search using selected keywords and Boolean operators may not have identified all articles relevant to the topic due to database unavailability or human error.
“Secondly, our search (using the selected keywords and Boolean operators) may not have identified all the articles relevant to the topic due to issues related to database unavailability or human error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTransparency will help business users to confidently assess the accuracy of responses based on their own tacit domain expertise, which will increase trust in these systems.
“This will help these business users to confidently assess the accuracy of the responses based on their own tacit domain expertise, which will increase trust in these systems (Cowgill and Tucker, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cowgill and Tucker, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe primary goal of embedding transparency within AI-based ML models is to help decision-making authorities understand what the AI system is doing, how it is generating output responses and why a particular response is generated.
“The primary goal of embedding transparency within AI-based ML models is to help the decision-making authorities understand what the AI system is doing, how it is generating the output responses and why a particular response is generated (Choudhury et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Choudhury et al., 2020 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe review is restricted to studies published in top tier peer reviewed journals (ABS ranking 3, 3*, 4 and 4*).
“Firstly, our review is restricted to studies published in top tier peer reviewed journals (ABS ranking -3, 3*, 4 and 4*).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese techniques currently lack transparency and explainability, which makes it difficult for managers to trust the output of AI.
“However, these techniques currently lack transparency and explainability, which makes it difficult for managers to trust the output of AI (Agarrwal et al., 2020;Bieda et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Agarrwal et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Bieda et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCommunicating strategic business goals and priorities, how AI will be used, and the rationale for its adoption leads to a better understanding of the AI adoption context and enhances trust and confidence in management initiatives and strategy.
“This will lead to a better understanding of AI adoption context, and enhance trust and confidence in the management initiatives and strategy (Mahidhar and Davenport, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mahidhar and Davenport, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe AI capability framework proposed in the article can be used by HRM practitioners to assess an organisation's readiness to adopt and implement AI systems.
“Firstly, the AI capability framework proposed in this article can be used by HRM practitioners to assess the readiness of the organisations to adopt and implement AI systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe extant business and management literature on AI indicates that AI adoption will shape the nature of work and job design in business organisations, have a positive impact on business productivity, and have a negative impact on employees' emotional state and job performance.
“The extant business and management literature on AI have highlighted how the adoption will shape nature of work and job design within business organisations, and its positive impact on business productivity, whereas negatively for employees' emotional state and job performance (Fleming, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fleming, 2019 source
The paper relies on this without support.
Popular press and technology vendors have overinflated expectations about benefits and drivers to AI adoption and implementation.
“The popular press and technology vendors have overinflated expectations about benefits and drivers to AI adoption and implementation”
The authors state this as an assumption.
AI systems in HRM are manmade (manufactured by human) and not developed by AI itself.
“While calling AI as manmade may be debatable (Steels and Brooks, 2018), however we are yet to come across an AI system which is developed by AI itself in HRM.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is a way of controlling the input data and changing the outcome.
“It is assumed in this argument that there is a way of controlling the input data and changing the outcome.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
AI has shortcomings in creative and social intelligence.
“Additionally, AI is assumed to have shortcomings in creative and social intelligence (Mak et al., 2020).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing AI implementation frameworks in HRM research do not consider the potential of GAI to change organizational norms and routines.
“(e) the potential of GAI to change organizational norms and routines (e.g. the role of humans and AI in a team, job displacement, replacement, spill-over and new opportunities).”
From Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business: Towards a Strategic Human Resource Management Framework (2024) · cites this paper as Chowdhury et al., 2023
The AI-Employee Collaboration and Theoretical Implications sections discuss how AI adoption can change jobs, teams, roles, organizational structure, and business practices. Our copy does not establish the claim that existing HRM implementation frameworks overlook these effects specifically for generative AI (GAI). Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExisting AI implementation frameworks in HRM research do not consider the need for continuous learning and adaptation by the workforce to keep pace with GAI developments.
“(d) the need for continuous learning and adaptation by the workforce to keep pace with GAI developments”
From Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business: Towards a Strategic Human Resource Management Framework (2024) · cites this paper as Chowdhury et al., 2023
The AI-Employee Collaboration section calls for reskilling and upskilling the workforce, and Practical Implications says employee knowledge must keep evolving to remain current in a turbulent AI environment. These passages support the need for learning and adaptation, but they do not say that existing HRM implementation frameworks overlook it or address generative AI (GAI) specifically. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the past 5 years, HRM scholarship on AI has increased.
“In the past 5 years, human resource management (HRM) scholarship on AI has increased (Budhwar et al., 2022;Chowdhury et al., 2023;Edwards et al., 2022;Malik, Budhwar, & Kazmi, 2022).”
From Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT (2023) · cites this paper as Chowdhury et al., 2023
The Selection of Articles section (page unavailable) says AI’s role in HRM has received significant scholarly attention and notes recent publications. Section 3.1 also calls AI-driven HR analytics a popular research area. These passages support growing scholarly interest, but they do not establish that HRM scholarship on AI increased specifically over the past five years. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExisting AI implementation frameworks in HRM research do not consider the rapid advancement and evolution of GAI.
“(c) the rapid advancement and evolution of GAI”
From Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business: Towards a Strategic Human Resource Management Framework (2024) · cites this paper as Chowdhury et al., 2023
Section 3.5, “Barriers to AI adoption,” mentions technology turbulence and the pace of technological change, but does not address generative AI (GAI). Searches for “generative AI” and for rapid technological change found no passage assessing whether HRM implementation frameworks account for GAI’s evolution. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExisting AI implementation frameworks in HRM research do not consider the superior capabilities of GAI compared to its predecessors.
“(b) the superior capabilities of GAI compared to its predecessors”
From Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business: Towards a Strategic Human Resource Management Framework (2024) · cites this paper as Chowdhury et al., 2023
The AI Organisational Resources section describes a general AI capability framework for HRM, but does not compare generative AI (GAI) with earlier AI or assess whether existing frameworks account for its capabilities. Searches for “generative,” “GAI,” and comparisons with previous AI technologies found no passage addressing that claim; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Artificial intelligence will have an impact on human resources.
“Artificial intelligence will have an impact on human resources (Jia et al., 2018; Johansson and Herranen, 2019; Chowdhury et al., 2023).”
From Exploring the antecedents of AI adoption for effective HRM practices in the Indian pharmaceutical sector (2023) · cites this paper as Chowdhury et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conclusion gives a different journal count
MinorThe methodology says the final journal list contained 98 journals, while the conclusion describes the review as covering 62 journals.
“Therefore, the final list comprised of 98 journals.”
“We reviewed potentially relevant studies in 62 top-tier HRM, GM, IB and IM journals”
Research-priority count changes from five to four
MinorThe discussion introduces five research priorities, whereas the conclusion says the review proposes four.
“we present five key research priorities and associated pathways”
“Based on the systematic review, we also propose four research priorities for theoretical and empirical advancement of scholarship on AI in HRM.”
Conclusion gives a different review size
MinorThe selection process reports 84 studies in the final review, but the conclusion says 69 articles were relevant. Both statements describe the completed review.
“Studies included in the final review (n=84)”
“based on the inclusion criteria as well the research question 69 articles were found to be relevant.”
Two different questions carry the A8 label
MinorThe skills-development question and the later ethics-and-governance question are both numbered A8, so the proposition labels are not unique.
“• A8: What are the factors that will help to determine skills, competencies and knowledge required by employees and managers?”
“• A8: How CSR principles and strategies within organisations can help account for AI ethics, governance, and regulations?”
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334 · see citing works
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in strategic management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,159 · see citing works
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337 · see citing works
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157 · see citing works
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386 · see citing works
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1120.003.0082 · Cited by 12,649 · see citing works
Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10045 · Cited by 11,321 · see citing works
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423 · see citing works
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727 · see citing works
“Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-3020 · Cited by 6,682 · see citing works
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042 · see citing works
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611 · see citing works
(1999) · PubMed · Cited by 4,115 · see citing works
Barney, J. B. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630102700602 · Cited by 3,949 · see citing works
(2018) · Cited by 3,510 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. M. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/2018.0072 · Cited by 3,508 · see citing works
Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
Doyle, T. (2017) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2017.1354593 · Cited by 3,110 · see citing works
Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0057 · Cited by 2,921 · see citing works
How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing
Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0 · Cited by 2,875 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 · Cited by 2,772 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072 · Cited by 2,755 · see citing works
Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125619864925 · Cited by 2,655 · see citing works
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021 · Cited by 2,628 · see citing works
Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001 · Cited by 2,046 · see citing works
Mexon, J., & Ananda Kumar, A. (2020) · Skyfox Publishing Group eBooks · doi:10.22573/spg.020.bk/s/026 · Cited by 2,013 · see citing works
Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816676645 · Cited by 1,836 · see citing works
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR THE REAL WORLD
Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2023) · International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science · doi:10.56726/irjmets42512 · Cited by 1,829 · see citing works
The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation
Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165946 · Cited by 1,702 · see citing works
Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103434 · Cited by 1,700 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward
Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125619867910 · Cited by 1,609 · see citing works
Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination
Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2015) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.002 · Cited by 1,400 · see citing works
DARPA's Explainable Artificial Intelligence Program
Gunning, D., & Aha, D. W. (2019) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850 · Cited by 1,360 · see citing works
A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0093 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Wamba-Taguimdje, S.-L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., & Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-10-2019-0411 · Cited by 1,280 · see citing works
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008) · European Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1017/s0003975609000150 · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
RAVICHANDRAN, T., LERTWONGSATIEN, C., & LERTWONGSATIEN, C. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820 · Cited by 1,238 · see citing works
Vaio, A. D., Palladino, R., Hassan, R., & Escobar, O. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.019 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature
Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2011) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.51 · Cited by 1,158 · see citing works
Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., & Trichina, E. (2022) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1871398 · Cited by 1,134 · see citing works
Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2018) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2016.55 · Cited by 1,117 · see citing works
Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.05.004 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence
Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2020) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w · Cited by 1,038 · see citing works
Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004 · Cited by 1,038 · see citing works
The Meaning, Antecedents and Outcomes of Employee Engagement: A Narrative Synthesis
Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2015) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12077 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Gunasekaran, A., Ndubisi, N. O., & Mani, V. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120447 · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration
Seeber, I., Bittner, E., Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, T., de Vreede, G.-J., Elkins, A., Maier, R., Merz, A. B., Oeste-Reiß, S., Randrup, N., et al. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.103174 · Cited by 835 · see citing works
Factors influencing big data decision-making quality
Janssen, M., van der Voort, H., & Wahyudi, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.007 · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D., & Fox, A. K. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.045 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Borges, A. F. S., Laurindo, F. J. B., Spínola, M. M., Gonçalves, R. F., & Mattos, C. A. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102225 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
Correani, A., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Natalicchio, A. (2020) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125620934864 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Rulers of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2020) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2019.09.003 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance
Shin, D., & Park, Y. J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.019 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development
Bag, S., Gupta, S., & Kumar, S. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing
von Krogh, G. (2018) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2018.0084 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Ready or not, AI comes—an interview study of organizational AI readiness factors
Jöhnk, J., Weißert, M., & Wyrtki, K. (2021) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-020-00676-7 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
HR and analytics: Why HR is set to fail the big data challenge
Angrave, D., Charlwood, A., Kirkpatrick, I., Lawrence, M., & Stuart, M. (2016) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12090 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Brock, J. K.-U., & von Wangenheim, F. (2019) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/1536504219865226 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
The Implementation of Business Process Reengineering
Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., Kettinger, W. J., & Teng, J. T. C. (1995) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1995.11518072 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Kearns, G. S., & Sabherwal, R. (2006) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222230306 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Cao, G., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102312 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
How artificial intelligence is changing drug discovery
Fleming, N. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05267-x · Cited by 546 · see citing works
Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., Dey, P. K., Joel-Edgar, S., & Abadie, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Self-citationSystematic literature review on sustainable human resource management
Macke, J., & Genari, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.091 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Newell, S., & Marabelli, M. (2015) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2015.02.001 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context
Dourish, P. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716665128 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Tallon, P. P., Queiroz, M., Coltman, T., & Sharma, R. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2018.12.002 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems
Schmidt, P., Biessmann, F., & Teubner, T. (2020) · Journal of Decision Systems · doi:10.1080/12460125.2020.1819094 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Braganza, A., Chen, W., Canhoto, A., & Sap, S. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.018 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Arslan, A., Cooper, C. L., Khan, Z., Gölgeci̇, İ., & Ali, I. (2021) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-01-2021-0052 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) for talent acquisition in IT/ITeS organizations
Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B. (2020) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-04-2020-0186 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Schryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Cubric, M. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101257 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Impact of artificial intelligence on employees working in industry 4.0 led organizations
Malik, N., Tripathi, S. N., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, S. (2022) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-03-2021-0173 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Leonidou, E., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.054 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Canhoto, A. I., & Clear, F. (2019) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.003 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Paschen, J., Wilson, M., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2020.01.003 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Human resources analytics: A systematization of research topics and directions for future research
Margherita, A. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100795 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC 2020)
(2020) · IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Magazine · doi:10.1109/msmc.2020.2973440 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
AI-enabled recruiting: What is it and how should a manager use it?
Black, J. S., & van Esch, P. (2020) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2019.12.001 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Toward an Ethics of Algorithms: Convening, Observation, Probability, and Timeliness
Ananny, M. (2016) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243915606523 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Marketing AI recruitment: The next phase in job application and selection
van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Ferolie, J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.009 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Rebooting employees: Upskilling for artificial intelligence in multinational corporations
Jaiswal, A., Arun, C. J., & Varma, A. (2022) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1891114 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Applying artificial intelligence: implications for recruitment
Upadhyay, A. K., & Khandelwal, K. (2018) · Strategic HR Review · doi:10.1108/shr-07-2018-0051 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Smart HR 4.0 – how industry 4.0 is disrupting HR
Sivathanu, B., & Pillai, R. (2018) · Human Resource Management International Digest · doi:10.1108/hrmid-04-2018-0059 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence
Liebowitz, J. (2001) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0957-4174(00)00044-0 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
The impact of artificial intelligence on labor productivity
Damioli, G., Van Roy, V., & Vertesy, D. (2021) · Eurasian Business Review · doi:10.1007/s40821-020-00172-8 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
The dark sides of people analytics: Reviewing the perils for organisations and employees
Giermindl, L. M., Strich, F., Christ, O., Leicht-Deobald, U., & Redzepi, A. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1927213 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Operations management and the resource based view: Another view
Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. (2015) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.003 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Employee Wellbeing, Productivity, and Firm PerformancePreprint
Krekel, C., Ward, G., & Jan-emmanuel De Neve, A. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3356581 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Beltagui, A., & Albores, P. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1761565 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Self-citationCompeting in the Age of AI: Strategy and Leadership When Algorithms and Networks Run the World
Bhattacharya, D. (2021) · Strategic Analysis · doi:10.1080/09700161.2021.1918951 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Hybrid-augmented intelligence: collaboration and cognition
Zheng, N., Liu, Z.-Y., Ren, P.-J., Ma, Y.-Q., Chen, S.-T., Yu, S.-Y., Xue, J.-R., Chen, B.-D., & Wang, F.-Y. (2017) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.1700053 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Coombs, C., Hislop, D., Taneva, S. K., & Barnard, S. (2020) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101600 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Malik, A., Budhwar, P. S., Patel, C., & Srikanth, N. R. (2020) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1859582 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Robots and organization studies: Why robots might not want to steal your job
Fleming, P. (2019) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840618765568 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Al-Husseini, S., El Beltagi, I., & Moizer, J. (2021) · International Journal of Leadership in Education · doi:10.1080/13603124.2019.1588381 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Machine learning and human capital complementarities: Experimental evidence on bias mitigation
Choudhury, P., Starr, E., & Agarwal, R. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3152 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
The Jobs That Artificial Intelligence Will Create
Wilson, H. J., Daugherty, P. R., & Morini-Bianzino, N. (2018) · What the Digital Future Holds · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11645.003.0020 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Robot will take your job: Innovation for an era of artificial intelligence
Rampersad, G. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.019 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification
Crain, M. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816657096 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Keding, C. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00181-x · Cited by 231 · see citing works
(2018) · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Zhang (2021) · doi:10.1145/3432945 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Applying artificial intelligence technique to predict knowledge hiding behavior
Abubakar, A. M., Behravesh, E., Rezapouraghdam, H., & Yildiz, S. B. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.006 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Lei, H., Gui, L., & Le, P. B. (2021) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-04-2020-0247 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Maity, S. (2019) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/jmd-03-2019-0069 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation
Macdonald, J. R., Zobel, C. W., Melnyk, S. A., & Griffis, S. E. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1421787 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Koh, D., Lee, K., & Joshi, K. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2355 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Caputo, F., Cillo, V., Candelo, E., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-07-2018-0833 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems
Lee, A. T. (1996) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199606)47:6 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
The benefits of eHRM and AI for talent acquisition
Johnson, R. D., Stone, D. L., & Lukaszewski, K. M. (2020) · Journal of Tourism Futures · doi:10.1108/jtf-02-2020-0013 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
The role of artificial intelligence in business transformation: A case of pharmaceutical companies
Kulkov, I. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101629 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Privacy at Work: A Review and a Research Agenda for a Contested Terrain
Bhave, D. P., Teo, L. H., & Dalal, R. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319878254 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Kshetri, N. (2021) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-03-2020-0168 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Digital data streams: creating value from the real-time flow of big data
Pigni, F., Piccoli, G., & Watson, R. (2016) · California Management Review · doi:10.1525/cmr.2016.58.3.5 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Wang, W., Chen, L., Xiong, M., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10154-4 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Andresen, M., & Bergdolt, F. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1243568 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Managing knowledge transfer by knowledge technologies
Garavelli, A. C., Gorgoglione, M., & Scozzi, B. (2002) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00009-8 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Extremes of acceptance: Employee attitudes toward artificial intelligence
Lichtenthaler, U. (2019) · Journal of Business Strategy · doi:10.1108/jbs-12-2018-0204 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm - A Problem-solving PerspectivePreprint
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.596964 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Parry, K., Cohen, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601116643442 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationWorking in the digitized economy: HRM theory & practice
Connelly, C. E., Fieseler, C., Černe, M., Giessner, S. R., & Wong, S. I. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100762 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Operations management research grounded in the resource-based view: A meta-analysis
Chahal, H., Gupta, M. C., Bhan, N., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107805 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Using AI to Enhance Business Operations
Tarafdar, M., Beath, C. M., & Ross, J. W. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12588.003.0015 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
People analytics effectiveness: developing a framework
Peeters, T., Paauwe, J., & Van De Voorde, K. (2020) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-04-2020-0071 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Using Artificial Intelligence to Promote Diversity
Daugherty, P. R., Wilson, H. J., & Chowdhury, R. (2020) · How AI Is Transforming the Organization · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12588.003.0006 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Modeling barriers of digital manufacturing in a circular economy for enhancing sustainability
Bag, S., Sahu, A. K., Kilbourn, P., Pisa, N., Dhamija, P., & Sahu, A. K. (2021) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-12-2020-0637 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Agarwal, V., Mathiyazhagan, K., Malhotra, S., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-03-2021-0192 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
La Torre, D., Colapinto, C., Durosini, I., & Triberti, S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2021.3077195 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Bankins, S., & Formosa, P. (2019) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1620328 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Continuing the evolution: towards sustainable HRM and sustainable organizations
Freitas, W. R. D. S., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Santos, F. C. A. (2011) · Business Strategy Series · doi:10.1108/17515631111166861 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Organizational agility and HRM strategy: Do they really enhance firms’ competitiveness?
Saha, N., Gregar, A., & Sáha, P. (2017) · International Journal of Organizational Leadership · doi:10.33844/ijol.2017.60454 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Achieving Operational Excellence Through Artificial Intelligence: Driving Forces and Barriers
Tariq, M. U., Poulin, M., & Abonamah, A. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686624 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Le, P. B. (2020) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration · doi:10.1108/apjba-04-2020-0129 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
A Systematic Review on the Use of AI and ML for Fighting the COVID-19 Pandemic
Islam, M. N., Inan, T. T., Rafi, S., Akter, S. S., Sarker, I. H., & Islam, A. K. M. N. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2021.3062771 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Are Organizations On Board with Best Practices Onboarding?
Klein, H. J., & Polin, B. (2012) · Oxford Handbooks Online · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763672.013.0014 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Partners of Humans: A Realistic Assessment of the Role of Robots in the Foreseeable Future
Aleksander, I. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-016-0032-4 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
On-line consistent ranking on e-recruitment: seeking the truth behind a well-formed CV
Faliagka, E., Iliadis, L., Karydis, I., Rigou, M., Sioutas, S., Tsakalidis, A., & Tzimas, G. E. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-013-9414-y · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Saidi Mehrabad, M., & Fathian Brojeny, M. (2007) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2007.06.023 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Zehir, C., Karaboğa, T., & Başar, D. (2019) · Contributions to Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29739-8_12 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
The role of artificial intelligence in knowledge management
Tsui, E., Garner, B. J., & Staab, S. (2000) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/s0950-7051(00)00093-9 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Business value appropriation roadmap for artificial intelligence
Mishra, A. N., & Pani, A. K. (2021) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-07-2019-0107 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Hopp, C., Antons, D., Kaminski, J., & Salge, T. O. (2018) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12440 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
How Human–Computer “Superminds” Are Redefining the Future of Work
Malone, T. W. (2019) · Why Humans Matter More Than Ever · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12450.003.0010 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Work design in a digitized gig economy
Schroeder, A. N., Bricka, T. M., & Whitaker, J. H. (2019) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100692 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Gig Economy, 4IR and Artificial Intelligence: Rethinking Strategic HRM
Malik, A., Budhwar, P. S., & Srikanth, N. R. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83867-223-220201005 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Sustainable business models and artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges
Toniolo, K., Masiero, E., Massaro, M., & Bagnoli, C. (2020) · Contributions to Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40390-4_8 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Can AI be racist? Color‐evasiveness in the application of machine learning to science assessments
Cheuk, T. (2021) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21671 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Cooke, F. L., Veen, A., & Wood, G. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1245671 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Job candidates’ reactions to AI-enabled job application processes
van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Arli, D. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-020-00025-0 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
New Games, New Rules, New Scoreboards: The Potential Consequences of Big Data
Markus, M. L. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2014.28 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Developing an Artificial Intelligence Capability: A Theoretical Framework for Business Value
Mikalef, P., Fjørtoft, S. O., & Torvatn, H. Y. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36691-9_34 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Are users threatened by credibility assessment systems?
Elkins, A. C., Dunbar, N. E., Adame, B., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2013) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222290409 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
"Why Should You Trust My Explanation?" Understanding Uncertainty in LIME Explanations
Zhang, Y., Song, K., Sun, Y., Tan, S., & Udell, M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.12991 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The Acceptance of Using Information Technology for Disaster Risk Management: A Systematic Review
Meechang, K., Leelawat, N., Tang, J., Kodaka, A., & Chintanapakdee, C. (2020) · Engineering Journal · doi:10.4186/ej.2020.24.4.111 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
(2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 64 · see citing works
IEEE 7010: A New Standard for Assessing the Well-being Implications of Artificial Intelligence
Schiff, D., Ayesh, A., Musikanski, L., & Havens, J. C. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283454 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Business challenges and research directions of management analytics in the big data era
Zhao, J. L., Fan, S., & Hu, D. (2014) · Journal of Management Analytics · doi:10.1080/23270012.2014.968643 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Kot, S., Hussain, H. I., Bilan, S., Haseeb, M., & Mihardjo, L. W. W. (2021) · Journal of Business Economics and Management · doi:10.3846/jbem.2021.14606 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
PREDICTION OF EMPLOYEE ATTRITION USING DATAMINING
Shankar, R. S., Rajanikanth, J., Sivaramaraju, V. V., & Murthy, K. V. S. S. R. (2018) · International Conference on System, Computation, Automation and Networking (ICSCAN) · doi:10.1109/icscan.2018.8541242 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The work-from-home trend: An interview with Brian Kropp
Faulds, D. J., & Raju, P. S. (2020) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2020.10.005 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Ahmed, O. (2018) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3932403 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Green Jobs on the background of Industry 4.0
Rutkowska, M., & Sulich, A. (2020) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.132 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
An employee’s best friend? How AI can boost employee engagement and performance
Smith, C. (2019) · Strategic HR Review · doi:10.1108/shr-11-2018-0092 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Younis, R. A. A., & Adel, H. M. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4127128 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Gulliford, F., & Parker Dixon, A. (2019) · Strategic HR Review · doi:10.1108/shr-12-2018-0104 · Cited by 44
Artificial Intelligence ―Creating Automated Insights for Customer Relationship Management
Deb, S. K., Jain, R., & Deb, V. (2018) · International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence) · doi:10.1109/confluence.2018.8442900 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
The profile of the ‘Good Judge’ in HRM: A systematic review and agenda for future research
Kock, F. S. D., Lievens, F., & Born, M. P. (2018) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.09.003 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence
Durai, S., Manoharan, G., & Ashtikar, S. P. (2024) · Advances in finance, accounting, and economics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-2881-1.ch003 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Leveraging people analytics for an adaptive complex talent management system
Saling, K. C., & Do, M. D. (2020) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.269 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Explainable AI for the Choquet Integral
Murray, B. J., Islam, M. A., Pinar, A. J., Anderson, D. T., Scott, G. J., Havens, T. C., & Keller, J. M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2020.3005682 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Industrial human resource management optimization based on skills and characteristics
Lee, D., & Ahn, C. (2020) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106463 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Bell, E., Bryman, A. E., & Harley, B. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/hebz/9780198869443.003.0012 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
(2020) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The Impact of Deep Learning on Organizational Agility
Wang, H., Huang, J. X., & Zhang, Z. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A hybrid approach of intelligent systems to help predict absenteeism at work in companies
Araujo, V. S., Rezende, T. S., Guimarães, A. J., Araujo, V. J. S., & de Campos Souza, P. V. (2019) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-019-0536-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Chornous, G. O., & Gura, V. L. (2020) · European Journal of Sustainable Development · doi:10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n1p83 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence
(2024) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7190-9.ch003 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Baakeel, O. A. (2020) · International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering · doi:10.30534/ijatcse/2020/9891.12020 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Pashkevich, N., Haftor, D., Karlsson, M., & Chowdhury, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11236708 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationA Two-Tier Solution to Converge People Analytics into HR Practices
Gaur, B., & Riaz, S. (2019) · 2019 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON) · doi:10.1109/iscon47742.2019.9036312 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
What’s Your Cognitive Strategy?
(2018) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11781.003.0006 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Scalable constraint-based virtual data center allocation
Bayless, S., Kodirov, N., Iqbal, S. M., Beschastnikh, I., Hoos, H. H., & Hu, A. J. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2019.103196 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Multi-agency gold incident command training for civil emergencies
P. Wilson, J., & Gosiewska, S. (2014) · Disaster Prevention and Management · doi:10.1108/dpm-11-2013-0212 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Do We Need HR? Repositioning People Management for Success
(2016) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-11-2015-0209 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Impact of artificial intelligence on employees working in industry 4.0 led organizations
Malik, N., Tripathi, S. N., Kar, A. K., et al. (n.d.) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.1108/ijm-03-2021-0173/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Why Your Board Needs a Plan for AI Oversight
Silverman, K. A. (2020) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Wang, G., Zhang, L., & Guo, J. (2021) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-189663 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Adoption of Information Technology in Modern Manufacturing Operation
Mak, S. L., Li, C. H. J., Tang, W. F., Wu, M. Y., & Lai, C. W. (2020) · doi:10.1109/ieem45057.2020.9309817 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Understanding Employee Attrition Using Explainable AI
Sabbineni, N. (2020) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ahmed, O. (2018) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3932402
Making the business case for AI in HR: two case studies
Altemeyer, B. (2019) · Strategic HR Review · doi:10.1108/shr-12-2018-0101
What’s Your Cognitive Technology Strategy?
Davenport, T. H., & Mahidhar, V. (2019) · Who Wins in a Digital World? · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11859.003.0012
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Amabile, 2020, Creativity, artificial intelligence, and a world of surprises, Academy of Management Discoveries, 6, 351
- Babic, 2021, Onboarding AI, Harvard Business Review, 98, 56
- Barro, 2019, People and machines: Partners in innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 22
- Budhwar, 2020, Call for papers: Artificial intelligence challenges and opportunities for international HRM. The, International Journal of Human Resource Management.
- Bughin, 2018, Skill shift: Automation and the future of the workforce, McKinsey Global Institute, 1, 3
- Chesney, 2019, Deepfakes and the new disinformation war: The coming age of post-truth geopolitics, Foreign Aff., 98, 147
- Chui, 2018, Notes from the AI frontier: Insights from hundreds of use cases, McKinsey Global Institute, 1
- Davenport, 2017, How P&G and American Express are approaching AI, Harvard Business Review (blog)
- Fountaine, 2019, Building the AI-powered organization, Harvard Business Review, 97, 62
- Ghosh, 2019, Taking a Systems Aproach to Adopting AI, Harvard Business Review, Technology & Operations
- IEEE 7010, 2020
- Kakkar, 2019, Technology driven human resource measurement–A strategic perspective, International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 10, 179
- Kshetri, 2021, Evolving uses of artificial intelligence in human resource management in emerging economies in the global South: some preliminary evidence, Management Research Review, 44, 970, 10.1108/MRR-03-2020-0168 · DOI · Paper page
- Ransbotham, 2018, Artificial intelligence in business gets real, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60280
- Ransbotham, 2019, Winning with AI, MIT Sloan Management Review and Boston Consulting Group
- Ransbotham, 2017, Reshaping business with artificial intelligence: Closing the gap between ambition and action, MIT Sloan Management Review, 59, 1
- Satell, 2019, We need AI that is explainable, auditable, and transparent, Harvard Business Review
- Singh, 2020, Workforce analytics: Increasing managerial efficiency in human resource, International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9, 3260
- Wilson, 2018, Collaborative intelligence: humans and AI are joining forces, Harvard Business Review, 96, 114
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., Boselie, P., Lee Cooke, F., Decker, S., DeNisi, A., et al. (2023) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12524 · Cited by 908 · see citing works
Self-citationConvolutional Neural Networks: A Survey
Krichen, M. (2023) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers12080151 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Perifanis, N.-A., & Kitsios, F. (2023) · Information · doi:10.3390/info14020085 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Revolutionizing the circular economy through new technologies: A new era of sustainable progress
Sánchez‐García, E., Martínez‐Falcó, J., Marco‐Lajara, B., & Manresa‐Marhuenda, E. (2023) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2023.103509 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Badghish, S., & Soomro, Y. A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16051864 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
The new normal: The status quo of AI adoption in SMEs
Schwaeke, J., Peters, A., Kanbach, D. K., Kraus, S., & Jones, P. (2025) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1080/00472778.2024.2379999 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Kong, H., Yin, Z., Baruch, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2023) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103928 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted HRM: Towards an extended strategic framework
Malik, A., Budhwar, P. S., & Kazmi, B. A. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100940 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Chang, P., Zhang, W., Cai, Q., & Guo, H. (2024) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s441444 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., & Wood, G. (2024) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12824 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citational-khatib, A. W. (2023) · Technology and Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102403 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
The adoption of artificial intelligence in human resources management practices
Nawaz, N., Arunachalam, H., Pathi, B. K., & Gajenderan, V. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100208 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Food quality 4.0: From traditional approaches to digitalized automated analysis
Hassoun, A., Jagtap, S., Garcia‐Garcia, G., Trollman, H., Pateiro, M., Lorenzo, J. M., Trif, M., Alexandru Vasile, R. U. S. U., Aadil, R. M., Šimat, V., et al. (2022) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111216 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science
Soto, I., Balzani, P., Carneiro, L., et al. (2024) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.13071 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Kong, H., Yin, Z., Chon, K., Yuan, Y., & Yu, J. (2023) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2023.2258116 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
AI in precision agriculture: A review of technologies for sustainable farming practices
Adewusi, A. O., Asuzu, O. F., Olorunsogo, T., Olorunsogo, T., Adaga, E. M., & Daraojimba, D. O. (2024) · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · doi:10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0314 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Neiroukh, S., Emeagwali, O. L., & Aljuhmani, H. Y. (2024) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2023-1946 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Przegalinska, A. K., Triantoro, T., Kovbasiuk, A., Ciechanowski, L., Freeman, R. B., & Sowa, K. (2025) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102853 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Human Resource Development: A Systematic Review
Ekuma, K. (2024) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/15344843231224009 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Chowdhury, S., Joel-Edgar, S., Dey, P. K., Bhattacharya, S., & Kharlamov, A. (2023) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2022.2066981 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citationChang, Y.-L., & Ke, J. (2023) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/15344843231200930 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Christou, P. (2023) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Dong, X., Tian, Y., He, M., & Wang, T. (2024) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-02-2024-0222 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Kumar, M., Raut, R. D., Mangla, S., Ferraris, A., & Choubey, V. K. (2022) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2022.2131620 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Deepa, R., Sekar, S., Malik, A., Kumar, J., & Attri, R. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123301 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Menzies, J. L., Sabert, B., Hassan, R., & Mensah, P. K. (2024) · Thunderbird International Business Review · doi:10.1002/tie.22370 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Rigotti, C., & Fosch‐Villaronga, E. (2024) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105966 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Lauring, J., & Jonasson, C. (2024) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.101044 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Faqihi, A. Y. A., & Miah, S. J. (2023) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm16010031 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Bujold, A., Roberge‐Maltais, I., Parent‐Rocheleau, X., Boasen, J., Sénécal, S., & Léger, P. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00325-1 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Florido‐Benítez, L., & Martínez, B. D. A. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13214151 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Ameen, N., Tarba, S. Y., Cheah, J., Xia, S., & Sharma, G. D. (2024) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12797 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Gong, Q., Fan, D., & Bartram, T. (2024) · International journal of human resources management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2024.2440065 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Transformative AI in human resource management: enhancing workforce planning with topic modeling
Venugopalan, M., Madhavan, V., Prasad, R., & Raghu Raman, R. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2432550 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Simón, C., Revilla, E., & Sáenz, M. J. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114783 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Dima, J., Gilbert, M., Dextras-Gauthier, J., & Giraud, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360401 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in tourism: insights and future research agenda
Tuo, Y., Wu, J., Zhao, J., & Si, X. (2024) · Tourism Review · doi:10.1108/tr-03-2024-0180 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Generative AI in international hotel marketing: impacts on employee creativity and performance
Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2025) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-10-2024-1595 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Yin, Z., Kong, H., Baruch, Y., Decosta, P. L., & Yuan, Y. (2024) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104966 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Wamba, S. F., de Queiroz, M. M., & Trinchera, L. (2023) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109131 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Zhang, Q., Zuo, J., & Yang, S. (2025) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-10-2024-1198 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
An, M., Lin, J., & Luo, X. R. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114786 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Gabsi, A. E. H. (2024) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-024-06012-6 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Human Resources Analytics for Public Personnel Management: Concepts, Cases, and Caveats
Cho, W., Choi, S., & Choi, H. (2023) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci13020041 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Fenwick, A., Molnár, G., & Frangos, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1272823 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Bevilacqua, S., Masárová, J., Perotti, F. A., & Ferraris, A. (2025) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-025-00836-7 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
The impacts of artificial intelligence on managerial skills
Giraud, L., Zaher, A., Hernandez, S., & Akram, A. A. (2022) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2022.2069537 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Gazi, M. A. I., Rahman, M. K. H., Masud, A. A., Amin, M. B., Chaity, N. S., Senathirajah, A. R. B. S., & Abdullah, M. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16177466 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Madanchian, M., & Taherdoost, H. (2025) · Inf. · doi:10.3390/info16010051 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Akbarighatar, P., Pappas, I. O., & Vassilakopoulou, P. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100193 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Student Perspectives on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Survey-Based Analysis
Idroes, G. M., Noviandy, T. R., Maulana, A., Irvanizam, I., Jalil, Z., Lensoni, L., Lala, A., Abas, A. H., Tallei, T. E., & Idroes, R. (2023) · Journal of Educational Management and Learning · doi:10.60084/jeml.v1i1.58 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Biloslavo, R., Edgar, D. A., Aydın, E., & Bulut, Ç. (2024) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2023-1944 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Embracing the AI/automation age: preparing your workforce for humans and machines working together
Tenakwah, E. S., & Watson, C. (2024) · Strategy and Leadership · doi:10.1108/sl-05-2024-0040 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Understanding Human-AI Augmentation in the Workplace: A Review and a Future Research Agenda
Trinh, N. T. T., & Elbanna, A. R. (2025) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-025-10591-5 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Gurjar, K., Jangra, A., Baber, H., Islam, M., & Sheikh, S. A. (2024) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2024.3355973 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Naveed, W., Nusrat, S., & Zahid, I. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21818 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Roux, M., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Yaroson, E. V., Pereira, V. E., & Abadie, A. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-023-05760-1 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationHalbusi, H. A., Popa, S., Soto‐Acosta, P., & Alshallaqi, M. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102937 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Khan, S., Mehmood, S., & Khan, S. U. (2024) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-06-2024-0302 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Leadership for AI Transformation in Health Care Organization: Scoping Review
Sriharan, A., Sekercioglu, N., Mitchell, C., Senkaiahliyan, S., Hertelendy, A. J., Porter, T. H., & Banaszak‐Holl, J. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/54556 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Reducing AI bias in recruitment and selection: an integrative grounded approach
Soleimani, M., Intezari, A. H., Arrowsmith, J., Pauleen, D. J., & Taşkın, N. (2025) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2025.2480617 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Business Model Innovation through AI Adaptation: The Role of Strategic Human Resources Management
Roy, S. K., Dey, B. L., Brown, D. M., Abid, A., Apostolidis, C., Christofi, M., & Tarba, S. Y. (2025) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12894 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Ghosh, S. K. (2024) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101851 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
AI-Based Human Resource Management Tools and Techniques; A Systematic Literature Review
Madanchian, M., Taherdoost, H., & Mohamed, N. A. (2023) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2023.12.039 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Yaroson, E. V., Abadie, A., & Roux, M. (2025) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-025-06534-7 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence-driven decision making and firm performance: a quantitative approach
Giachino, C., Čepel, M., Truant, E., & Bargoni, A. (2024) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2023-1966 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Sandeep, M. M., Lavanya, V., & Balakrishnan, J. (2025) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/jic-05-2024-0155 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Chowdhury, S., Ren, S., & Richey, R. G., Jr. (2025) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109519 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence, digital finance, and green innovation
Song, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., & Sahut, J. (2024) · Global Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101072 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Tan, K., Gim, G. C. W., Hii, I. S. H., & Zhu, W. (2023) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2023.2224550 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Do, H., Chu, L.-X., & Shipton, H. (2025) · Journal of business research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115279 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Islam, M. A., Aldaihani, F. M. F., & Saatchi, S. G. (2023) · Global Business and Organizational Excellence · doi:10.1002/joe.22226 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Soomro, S., Fan, M., Sohu, J. M., Soomro, S., & Shaikh, S. N. (2024) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-07-2024-1889 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Qi, M., Wu, T., Duan, W., & Li, S. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15050696 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Hong, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2024.3457520 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Raina, K., Sharma, G. D., Taheri, B., et al. (2025) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2025.100860 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Aftab, J., Stan, M. R., Srivastava, M., Wei, F., & Abid, N. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.4322 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Nyberg, A. J., Schleicher, D. J., Bell, B. S., Boon, C., Cappelli, P., Collings, D. G., Dalle Molle, J. E., Feuerriegel, S., Gerhart, B., Jeong, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063251325188 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Malik, A., Budhwar, P. S., & Kaur, P. (2024) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22263 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Li, C., Ashraf, S. F., Amin, S., & Safdar, M. N. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231217731 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Ogiemwonyi, O., Alam, M. N., & Alotaibi, H. S. (2023) · Business Strategy & Development · doi:10.1002/bsd2.297 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Saeed, A., Ali, A., & Ashfaq, S. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123636 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Al-Faouri, E. H., Huson, Y. A., Aljawarneh, N. M., & Alqmool, T. J. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16114747 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Mahade, A., Elmahi, A., Alomari, K. M., & Abdalla, A. A. (2025) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-025-01114-y · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Li, J., & Jin, X. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16219350 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
David, A., Yiğitcanlar, T., Desouza, K. C., Li, R. Y. M., Cheong, P. H., Mehmood, R., & Corchado, J. M. (2024) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105502 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Developing AI literacy in HRD: competencies, approaches, and implications
Li, H., & Kim, S. (2024) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678868.2024.2337962 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Huo, W., Li, Q., Liang, B., Wang, Y., & Li, X. Y. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15010088 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Bobițan, N., Dumitrescu, D., Popa, A. F., Sahlian, D.-N., & Țurlea, I.-C. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13112198 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Rane, N. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4603230 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Addressing Algorithmic Bias in AI‐Driven HRM Systems: Implications for Strategic HRM Effectiveness
Bandara, R. J., Biswas, K., Akter, S., Shafique, S., & Rahman, M. (2025) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12609 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Kim, B., Kim, M., & Lee, J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05040-2 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Al‐Khatib, A. W., Alghababsheh, M., & Khattab, M. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123905 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Objectivity by design: The impact of AI-driven approach on employees' soft skills evaluation
Gafni, R., Aviv, I., Kantsepolsky, B., Sherman, S., Rika, H., Itzkovich, Y., & Barger, A. (2024) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107430 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Hammerschmidt, T., Stolz, K., & Posegga, O. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2500451 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Chakraborty, I., Chiong, K. X., Dover, H. F., & Sudhir, K. (2024) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2023.0149 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
AI Adoption in Jordanian SMEs: The Influence of Technological and Organizational Orientations
Almashawreh, R., Talukder, M., Charath, S. K., & Khan, M. I. (2024) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/09721509241250273 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Deng, N., Gong, Y., & Wang, J. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141686 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Rane, N. L. (2024) · Studies in Economics and Business Relations · doi:10.48185/sebr.v5i1.1001 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Assisting artificial intelligence adoption drivers in human resources management: a mediation model
Qahtani, E. A., & Alsmairat, M. A. K. (2023) · Acta Logistica · doi:10.22306/al.v10i1.371 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L.
- Affiliations
- TBS Education (FR)
- Aston University (GB)
- Northeastern University London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Chowdhury, Soumyadeb
- Venue
- Human Resource Management Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100899
- ISSN
- 1053-4822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4293229829
- Cited by
- 927
- References
- 156
- Citations by year
- 2026: 230 · 2025: 311 · 2024: 257 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 10 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 164.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Resource Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (acceptedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Aston University (2020-21)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in human resource management, organizational resources, artificial intelligence adoption, organizational readiness, non-technical skills, leadership, organizational culture, AI governance, resource-based view, knowledge-based view, research propositions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review