CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 260Quality and Supply ManagementSustainable Supply Chain ManagementSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supply chain evolution – theory, concepts and science

Open access
MacCarthy, Bart L., Blome, Constantin, Olhager, Jan, Srai, Jagjit Singh, Zhao, Xiande·2016·International Journal of Operations & Production Management
DOI 10.1108/ijopm-02-2016-0080
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: Supply chains evolve and change in size, shape and configuration, and in how they are coordinated, controlled and managed. Some supply chains are mature and relatively unchanging. Some are subject to significant change. New supply chains may emerge and evolve for a variety of reasons. The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature of supply chain evolution and address the question “What makes a supply chain like it is?” Design/methodology/approach: The paper analyses and develops key aspects, concepts and principal themes concerning the emergence and evolution of supply chains over their lifecycle. Findings: The paper defines the supply chain lifecycle and identifies six factors that interact and may affect a supply chain over its lifecycle – technology and innovation, economics, markets and competition, policy and regulation, procurement and sourcing, supply chain strategies and re-engineering. A number of emergent themes and propositions on factors affecting a supply chain’s characteristics over its lifecycle are presented. The paper argues that a new science is needed to investigate and understand the supply chain lifecycle. Practical implications: Supply chains are critical for the world economy and essential for modern life. Understanding the supply chain lifecycle and how supply chains evolve provides new perspectives for contemporary supply chain design and management. Originality/value: The paper presents detailed analysis, critique and reflections from leading researchers on emerging, evolving and mature supply chains.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijopm-02-2016-0080

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 2014, Business models for sustainable technologies: exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles, Research Policy, 43, 284, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.014 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2016, Platform Transformation
  3. 2013, What Does Shangpinzhaipei Depend On? (尚品宅配凭什么?)
  4. 2015, Import testing of pharmaceutical products has limited safety benefits and can add risk to patients, Pharmaceutical Technology, 39, 18
  5. 2010, Dynamic Supply Chains: Delivering Value Through People
  6. 2013, Shangpinzhaipei: how does Chinese sample of C2B become itself? (尚品宅配：C2B中国样本如何炼成), Business Review, 135, 106
  7. 2005, Pharmaceutical parallel trade in Europe: stakeholder and competition effects, Economic Policy, 20, 758, 10.1111/j.1468-0327.2005.00150.x · DOI
  8. 2014, Shangpinzhaipei: the Chinese sample of C2B. (尚品宅配,C2B的中国样本), Manager’s Journal, 2014, 72
  9. 2013, When one size does not fit all, MIT Sloan Management Review, 54, 15
  10. 2015, Future supply chains enabled by continuous processing: opportunities and challenges, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 104, 840
  11. 2012, C2B, the new business model in the internet era (C2B, 互联网时代的新商业模式), Harvard Business Review (Chinese Version), 2012, 102
  12. 2016, Platform-Based Business Model Innovation and System Design

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–259 of 259

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
MacCarthy, B. L., Blome, C., Olhager, J., Srai, J. S., & Zhao, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • China Europe International Business School (CN)
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-12-05
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
1696-1718
ISSN
0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/ijopm-02-2016-0080
OpenAlex
W2355627718
Cited by
260
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
31.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Operations & Production Management (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • CEIBS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Keywords
supply chain evolution, supply chain design, technology and innovation, policy and regulation, market competition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review