The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: A systematic review and paths for further investigation
Abstract
Purpose: – This paper provides a robust and structured literature review on supply chain resilience (SCRES), the supply chain’s ability to be prepared for unexpected risk events, responding and recovering quickly to potential disruptions to return to its original situation or grow by moving to a new, more desirable state. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the extant research through focussed questions and provide an insightful framework with propositions to guide further publications and identify future research needs. Design/methodology/approach: – The findings underlie a systematic literature review methodology requiring a robust method of literature analysis. The sand cone model is adopted to develop a comprehensive SCRES framework. Findings: – The literature review reveals a strong need for an overarching SCRES definition and a clear terminology for its building elements. It indicates that most research has been qualitative and lacks in assessing and measuring SCRES performance. Originality/value: – This paper contributes a structured overview of 67 peer-reviewed articles from 2003 to 2013 on an emerging area of supply chain research. The review formulates an overarching definition of SCRES, groups and synthesizes the various SCRES elements into proactive and reactive strategies for the ex-ante/ex-post disruption stage and illustrates SCRES measurement through performance metrics. It provides a comprehensive SCRES framework with propositions and indicates gaps in the literature to target for further development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Building the Resilient Supply Chain
Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090410700275 · Cited by 3,664
Perspectives in supply chain risk management
Tang, C. S. (2006) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006 · Cited by 2,577
Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience
Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090910954873 · Cited by 2,530
Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains
Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x · Cited by 2,088
(2009) · Cited by 2,062
A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise
Rice, J. B., & Sheffi, Y. (2005) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 1,741
On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks
Tomlin, B. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515 · Cited by 1,700
The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities
Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151.x · Cited by 1,685
ENSURING SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE: DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x · Cited by 1,480
Cited by
Zhao, G., Liu, S., Lopez, C., Lu, H., Elgueta, S., Chen, H., & Boshkoska, B. M. (2019) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.002 · Cited by 731
Ali, A., Mahfouz, A., & Arisha, A. (2017) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-06-2016-0197 · Cited by 676
Spieske, A., & Birkel, H. (2021) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452 · Cited by 499
Zamani, E. D., Smyth, C., Gupta, S., & Dennehy, D. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-022-04983-y · Cited by 409
Lohmer, J., Bugert, N., & Lasch, R. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107882 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Hohenstein, N.-O., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., & Giunipero, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-03-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 90-117
- ISSN
- 0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1499417591
- Cited by
- 848
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 98.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: A systematic review and paths for further investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0128
- The paper
- Hohenstein, N.-O., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., & Giunipero, L. (2015). Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: A systematic review and paths for further investigation. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.