The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antecedents and dimensions of supply chain robustness: a systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to provide groundwork for an emerging theory of supply chain robustness – which has been conceptualized as a dimension of supply chain resilience – through reviewing and synthesizing related yet disconnected studies. The paper develops a formal definition of supply chain robustness to build a framework that captures the dimensions, antecedents and moderators of the construct as discussed in the literature. Design/methodology/approach: – The authors apply a systematic literature review approach. In order to reduce researcher bias, they involve a team of academics, librarians and managers. Findings: – The paper first, provides a formal definition of supply chain robustness; second, builds a theoretical framework of supply chain robustness that augments both causal and descriptive knowledge; third,shows how findings in this review support practice; and fourth,reveals methodological insights on the use of journal rankings in reviews. Research limitations/implications: – At this stage, managers may benefit from seeing these relationships as clues derived from the literature. The paper is fundamentally a call for researchers to conduct quantitative testing of such relationships to derive more reliable understanding and practical applications. Practical implications: – Rather than presenting empirical findings, this paper reveals to managers that visibility, risk management orientation and reduced network complexity have been the main predictive antecedents of supply chain robustness (as discussed in the academic literature). This provides a potentially important signal as to where to invest resources. Originality/value: – The study is the first to develop a formal definition of supply chain robustness and to establish a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding the construct.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Building the Resilient Supply Chain
Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090410700275 · Cited by 3,664
The Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences of Emotional Labor
Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259161 · Cited by 2,545
The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods
Buchanan, D., & Bryman, A. E. (2009) · Cited by 2,123
Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains
Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x · Cited by 2,088
(2009) · Cited by 2,062
Managing Risk To Avoid Supply-Chain Breakdown
Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004) · MIT Sloan Management Review · Cited by 1,860
Cited by
Ali, A., Mahfouz, A., & Arisha, A. (2017) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-06-2016-0197 · Cited by 676
Supply chain digitisation trends: An integration of knowledge management
Schniederjans, D. G., Curado, C., & Khalajhedayati, M. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.012 · Cited by 432
Awan, U., Sroufe, R., & Kraslawski, A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.308 · Cited by 312
Shekarian, M., & Mellat Parast, M. (2021) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2020.1763935 · Cited by 303
E-fulfilment and distribution in omni-channel retailing: a systematic literature review
Melacini, M., Perotti, S., Rasini, M., & Tappia, E. (2018) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2017-0101 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Durach, C. F., Wieland, A., & Machuca, J. A. D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-03-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 118-137
- ISSN
- 0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967156217
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antecedents and dimensions of supply chain robustness: a systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0133
- The paper
- Durach, C. F., Wieland, A., & Machuca, J. A. D. (2015). Antecedents and dimensions of supply chain robustness: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.