Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 72Corruption and Economic DevelopmentPublic Administration in Developing NationsPublic Policy and Administration Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local governance, corruption, and public service quality: evidence from a national survey in Vietnam

Nguyen, Thang V., Bach, Thang N., Le, Thanh Q., Le, Canh Q.·2017·International Journal of Public Sector Management
DOI 10.1108/ijpsm-08-2016-0128
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine whether higher levels of transparency, accountability, and participation have a statistically significant association with corruption, and whether corruption is highly correlated with lower public service quality in the context of Vietnam’s transition economy. Design/methodology/approach Using individual-level survey data from Vietnam Provincial Governance and Public Administration Performance Index, the research employs an ordered probit model to test whether greater transparency, accountability, and participation is associated with lower levels of corruption. Moreover, district-level data are used to test the relationship between corruption and quality of public services particularly in healthcare and primary education. Findings Results show that a higher level of transparency, participation, and accountability is associated with a lower level of corruption, and that corruption is negatively associated with public service quality. Research limitations/implications The use of cross-sectional data does not allow the establishment of causal relationships among variables. Practical implications The research suggests that fostering accountability to citizens and non-state sectors and promotion of genuine participation from these actors are critical for the future anti-corruption agenda. Originality/value In developing countries, whether corruption enhances efficiency of service provision is highly debatable. This research contribut…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijpsm-08-2016-0128

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 2005, Social Accountability in the Public Sector: A Conceptual Discussion
  2. 2008, Governance regimes, corruption and growth: theory and evidence, Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 195, 10.1016/j.jce.2007.11.004 · DOI
  3. 2008, Does corruption affects health outcomes in the Philippines?, Economics of Governance, 9, 197, 10.1007/s10101-006-0031-y · DOI
  4. 1997, Corruption and development: a review of issues, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 1320
  5. 2009, Corruption in public service delivery: an experimental analysis, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 225, 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.07.006 · DOI
  6. 2004, Accountability and health systems: toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance, Health Policy and Planning, 19, 371, 10.1093/heapol/czh052 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Channa, A. and Faguet, J. (2012), “Decentralization of health and education in developing countries: a quality-adjusted review of the empirical literature”, STICERD – Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers Series 038, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
  8. 2003, Local government decision-making – citizen participation and local accountability: some evidence from Kenya and Uganda, Public Administration and Development, 23, 307, 10.1002/pad.281 · DOI
  9. Dong, B. (2011), “The causes and consequences of corruption”, PhD thesis submitted at Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
  10. 2013, Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry, Public Choice, 155, 413
  11. 2002, Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries, Journal of Public Economics, 83, 325, 10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00158-4 · DOI
  12. 2009, A troubled relationship: corruption and reform of the public sector in development, Journal of Management Development, 28, 513, 10.1108/02621710910959675 · DOI
  13. 2003, Bureaucratic corruption, environmental policy and inbound US FDI: theory and evidence, Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1407, 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00016-6 · DOI
  14. 2015, Quality of governance and ethical public service delivery (PSD) in developing countries, Journal of Management and Strategy, 6, 28
  15. 2012, Human nature and morality in the anti-corruption discourse of transparency international, Public Administration and Development, 32, 109, 10.1002/pad.1604 · DOI
  16. 2007, Political cleaners: women as the new anti-corruption force?, Development and Change, 38, 87, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00404.x · DOI
  17. 2000, Fighting corruption in the developing countries, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 220, 43
  18. 1997, Corruption: the facts, Foreign Policy, 107, 114
  19. Khan, M.H. (2006), “Determinants of corruption in developing countries: the limits of conventional economic analysis”, in Rose-Ackerman, S. (Ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 216-244. · DOI
  20. 2013, What determines permissiveness toward corruption? A study of attitudes in Latin America, Public Integrity, 15, 345, 10.2753/PIN1099-9922150402 · DOI
  21. 1964, Economic development through bureaucratic corruption, American Behavioral Scientist, 8, 8, 10.1177/000276426400800303 · DOI
  22. 1965, What is the problem about corruption?, Journal of Modern African Studies, 3, 215, 10.1017/S0022278X00023636 · DOI
  23. 2010, Why some countries thrive despite corruption: the role of trust in the corruption-efficiency relationship, Review of International Political Economy, 17, 129, 10.1080/09692290802577446 · DOI
  24. 2002, Corruption and organization in Asian management system, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 405, 10.1023/A:1016252021370 · DOI
  25. 1998, Corruption and the composition of government expenditure, Journal of Public Economics, 69, 263, 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00025-5 · DOI
  26. 2010, The perception of corruption, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 120, 10.1093/ijpor/edp058 · DOI
  27. 2005, Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth?, Public Choice, 122, 69
  28. 2010, Is corruption an efficient grease?, World Development, 38, 244, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.004 · DOI
  29. 2010, Accountability in the new public sector: a comparative case study, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23, 632, 10.1108/09513551011078897 · DOI
  30. 1991, The allocation of talent: implications for growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 503, 10.2307/2937945 · DOI
  31. 1993, Why is rent-seeking so costly for growth?, American Economic Review, 83, 409
  32. 2016, Strategic and transactional costs of corruption: perspectives from Vietnamese firms, Crime, Law, and Social Change, 65, 351, 10.1007/s10611-016-9609-7 · DOI
  33. 2015, Citizen participation in city governance: experiences from Vietnam, Public Administration and Development, 35, 34, 10.1002/pad.1702 · DOI
  34. 2011, Corruption as an obstacle to development in developing countries: a review of literature, Journal of Money Laundering Control, 14, 387, 10.1108/13685201111173857 · DOI
  35. 2008, From command economy to hollow state? Decentralisation in Vietnam and China, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67, 79, 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00570.x · DOI
  36. 2006, Corruption, democracy and environmental policy: an empirical contribution to the debate, Journal of Environment and Development, 15, 332, 10.1177/1070496506290960 · DOI
  37. 2008, Effects of the institutional design of the civil service: evidence from corruption, International Public Management Journal, 11, 404, 10.1080/10967490802491095 · DOI
  38. 2008, Can corruption and economic crime be controlled in developing economies – and if so, is the cost worth it?, Journal of Money Laundering Control, 11, 273, 10.1108/13685200810889425 · DOI
  39. 2009, The changing nature of public values in developing countries, International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 313
  40. 2002, The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: a comparative study of four Latin American countries, The Journal of Politics, 64, 408, 10.1111/1468-2508.00132 · DOI
  41. 2004, Crime reporting as a measure of institutional development, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52, 851, 10.1086/420900 · DOI
  42. Spector, B.I. (Ed.) (2005), Fighting Corruption in Developing Countries: Strategies and Analysis, Kumarian Press, Bloomfield CT.
  43. Tanzi, V. and Davoodi, H. (1997), “Corruption, public spending and growth”, IMF Working Paper No. WP/97/139, Washington, DC. · DOI
  44. 2011, Corruption, attitudes and education: survey evidence from Nepal, World Development, 39, 1133, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.11.003 · DOI
  45. 2010, Corruption, manufacturing plant growth, and the Asian paradox: Indonesian evidence, World Development, 38, 693, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.022 · DOI
  46. 2007, Review of corruption in health sector: theory, methods and interventions, Health Policy and Planning, 23, 83, 10.1093/heapol/czm048 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Walton, G. and Peiffer, C. (2015), “The limitations of education for addressing corruption: lessons from attitudes towards reporting in Papua New Guinea”, Crawford School of Public Policy’s Development Policy Discussion Paper, No. 39, The Australian National University, Canberra. · DOI
  48. 2000, How taxing is corruption on international investors?, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 1, 10.1162/003465300558533 · DOI
  49. 2004, Corruption, growth and the environment: a cross-country analysis, Environmental and Development Economics, 9, 663, 10.1017/S1355770X04001500 · DOI
  50. 2000, State-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Vietnam: perception of strategic direction for a society in transition, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13, 169, 10.1108/09513550010338908 · DOI
  51. 2007, Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality, Public Administration Review, 67, 249, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x · DOI
  52. 2002, Decentralization and corruption: evidence from US Federal transfer programs, Public Choice, 113, 25
  53. 2012, Corrupt governmental networks false, International Public Management Journal, 15, 62, 10.1080/10967494.2012.684019 · DOI
  54. 1985, An equilibrium queuing model of bribery, Journal of Political Economy, 93, 760, 10.1086/261329 · DOI

Cited by

See all 72

Metadata

Authors
Nguyen, T. V., Bach, T. N., Le, T. Q., & Le, C. Q.
Affiliations
  • National Economics University (VN)
  • Flinders University (AU)
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Public Sector Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2017-03-06
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
137-153
ISSN
0951-3558 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/ijpsm-08-2016-0128
OpenAlex
W2587875726
Cited by
72
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
  • International Journal of Public Sector Management (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
local governance, corruption, public service quality, transparency, accountability, citizen participation, anti-corruption, quality of care, primary education quality, transition economies, Vietnam

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.