Cited by 422Corruption and Economic DevelopmentHealthcare Systems and ReformsPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Review of corruption in the health sector: theory, methods and interventions

Open access
Vian, T.·2007·Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

There is increasing interest among health policymakers, planners and donors in how corruption affects health care access and outcomes, and what can be done to combat corruption in the health sector. Efforts to explain the risk of abuse of entrusted power for private gain have examined the links between corruption and various aspects of management, financing and governance. Behavioural scientists and anthropologists also point to individual and social characteristics which influence the behaviour of government agents and clients. This article presents a comprehensive framework and a set of methodologies for describing and measuring how opportunities, pressures and rationalizations influence corruption in the health sector. The article discusses implications for intervention, and presents examples of how theory has been applied in research and practice. Challenges of tailoring anti-corruption strategies to particular contexts, and future directions for research, are addressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapol/czm048

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the same Transparency International report, the health minister used state-of-emergency rules to purchase more than half of essential medicines from a single supplier, and prices paid were as much as 41% higher than international averages.

    “The CSOs learned that the then health minister had used state-of-emergency rules to purchase more than half of the essential medicines from a single supplier. Also, the prices paid for these medicines were as much as 41 percent higher than the international averages [33].”

    From The risk of corruption in public pharmaceutical procurement: how anti-corruption, transparency and accountability measures may reduce this risk (2020) · cites this paper as [33]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Azfar O. 2005. Corruption and the delivery of health and education services. In: Spector BI, (ed.). Fighting corruption in developing countries: strategies and analysis. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, pp. 181-212.
  2. Emerging Markets Group. 2005. Armenian reproductive health system review: structure and system inefficiencies that hinder access to care for rural populations. Washington, DC: Emerging Markets Group for USAID.
  3. Ensor T, Antonio D-M. 2002. Corruption as a challenge to effective regulation in the health sector. In: Saltman RB, Busse R, Mossialos E, (eds). Regulating entrepreneurial behavior in European health care systems. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  4. Jaen MH, Paravisini D. 2001. Wages, capture and penalities in Venezuela'. In: Di Tella R, Savedoff WD, (eds). Diagnosis corruption: fraud in Latin America's public hospitals. Washington, DC: Inter-American Develop- ment Bank, pp. 57-94.
  5. Kassirer J. 2006. The corrupting influence of money in medicine. In: Transparency International. Global Corruption Report 2006: Special focus on corruption and health. London: Pluto Press.
  6. Lewis M. 2002. Informal health payments in central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union: issues, trends and policy implica- tions. In: Mossialos M, Dixon A, Figueras J, Kutzin J, (eds). Funding health care: options for Europe. European Observatory on Health Care Systems Series. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, pp. 184-205.
  7. Ramos M. 2003. Auditors' responsibility for fraud detection. Journal of Accountancy (online), January, p. 28, http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/ jofa/jan2003/ramos.htm.
  8. Rose R. 2006. Corruption is bad for your health: findings from Central and Eastern Europe. In: Transparency International. Global Corruption Report 2006: Special focus on corruption and health. London: Pluto Press, pp. 39-43.
  9. Savedoff WD. 2006. The causes of corruption in the health sector: a focus on health care systems. In: Transparency International. Global Corruption Report 2006: Special focus on corruption and health. London: Pluto Press.
  10. Spector BI. 2005. Fighting corruption. Chapter 1. In: Spector B, (ed.). Fighting corruption in developing countries: strategies and analysis. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, pp. 1-9.
  11. Transparency International. 2006. Global Corruption Report 2006: Special focus on corruption and health. London: Pluto Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vian, T.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Vian, T.
Venue
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2007-11-12
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
83-94
ISSN
  • 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2237
OpenAlex
W2108232910
Cited by
422
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Health Policy and Planning (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
corruption, health sector, anti-corruption interventions, health care access, health governance, health care financing, corruption measurement, client behaviour, corruption risk factors
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Fraud, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Policy Making, United States, Health Care Sector

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review