Lean awareness and potential for lean implementation in the Indian coal mining industry: An empirical study
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to determine the degree of lean awareness and implementation and to identify the perception on tools, enablers, barriers and potential benefits of lean in the Indian coal mining industry. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic review of lean literature and expert opinion was used to design the survey instrument. Data were collected through electronic survey and traditional pencil and paper approach. In order to test the research hypotheses, independent sample t-tests were done. Findings: The study reveals that there is a certain degree of lean awareness although the level of lean implementation is still at a nascent stage in the Indian coal mining sector. The main applicable tools, barriers, enablers and benefits have also been identified based on 54 respondents out of 109 suitable respondents. Research limitations /implications: In this study, relatively the maximum participants were from the mines located in Eastern India. Thus, a certain level of bias can be anticipated. The findings would help the decision makers, researchers and practitioners to better utilize the available resources for lean implementation and support the existing academic research on lean. Originality/Value: The concept of lean in mining industry is relatively a new paradigm and there is a lack of empirical study that explores applicable tools, barriers, enablers and benefits of lean in Indian mining industry. The study addresses this gap in the lean literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some employees fear losing their jobs due to retrenchment when non-value-added activities become visible.
“authorssuchasKhabaand Bhar(2018),Shamah(2013)andWongandWong(2011)averredthatsomeemployeesfear losing their jobs due to retrenchment when non-value-added activities become visible.”
From A systematic literature review of lean manufacturing implementation in manufacturing-based sectors of the developing and developed countries (2022) · cites this paper as Khaba and Bhar, 2018
Coal mines in India that are ISO certified have a higher implementation rate of LM practices.
“Coal mines in India that are ISO certified have a higher implementation rate of LM practices. The most common LM enabler was top management support”
From A systematic literature review of lean manufacturing implementation in manufacturing-based sectors of the developing and developed countries (2022) · cites this paper as Khaba and Bhar (2018)
The most common LM enabler was top management support.
“Coal mines in India that are ISO certified have a higher implementation rate of LM practices. The most common LM enabler was top management support”
From A systematic literature review of lean manufacturing implementation in manufacturing-based sectors of the developing and developed countries (2022) · cites this paper as Khaba and Bhar (2018)
In developing countries, additional drivers cited are reducing waste, increasing profit, and worker empowerment.
“Thedevelopingcountriesalsociteother drivers,suchasreducingwasteandincreasingprofit(ShrimaliandSoni,2017)andworker empowerment(KhabaandBhar,2018).”
From A systematic literature review of lean manufacturing implementation in manufacturing-based sectors of the developing and developed countries (2022) · cites this paper as Khaba and Bhar, 2018
Cites
Fullerton, R. R., Kennedy, F. A., & Widener, S. K. (2014) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.002 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
An empirical study for implementation of lean principles in Indian manufacturing industry
Jasti, N. V. K., & Kodali, R. (2016) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-11-2013-0101 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Antony, J., Psomas, E., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Hines, P. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1776410 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
“…Srinivasan 2019; Jasti and Kodali 2014a; Jasti and Kodali 2015; Jasti and Kodali 2016; Kamble, Gunasekaran, and Dhone 2020; Khaba and Bhar 2018a; Khaba and Bhar 2018b; Knol et al. 2018; Kruse, Veltri, and Branscum 2019; Kumar and Parameshwaran 2018; Lermen et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2017; Loow…”
BackgroundInfluentialMaware, C., Okwu, M. O., & Adetunji, O. (2022) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-12-2020-0223 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
- Authors
- Khaba, S., & Bhar, C.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad (IN)
- Venue
- International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-06-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1215-1231
- ISSN
- 0265-671X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2800394911
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Keywords
- lean manufacturing, lean implementation, coal industry, lean tools, Indian coal mines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review