How do cultural factors affect loyalty behaviour in retailing? The central role of social proximity
Abstract
Purpose Retail store loyalty is essential to the survival and success of a retailer. The intangible benefits provided by the social exchange in-store influence the way consumers consider their relationships with the retailer. However, its relationships with social proximity and cultural factors are not clear. Therefore, this article investigates the effects of specific cultural dimensions on loyalty behaviour, as well as the mediating role of social proximity on the relationship investigated. Design/methodology/approach This research is based on an empirical investigation undertaken in Thailand with a sample of 636 respondents. Two retail chains were investigated (Big C and Tesco). Structural equation modelling was used to test the research model and a series of research hypotheses. Findings The results reveal that uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation have positive direct effects on loyalty, while collectivism does not. Furthermore, social proximity significantly mediates the effects of collectivism and long-term orientation on customer loyalty. These findings show that Thailand is a specific emerging market in which retail chains should adapt their loyalty programme accordingly. Practical implications The cultural differences could be used for segmentation strategy for retailers to engage customers in a relationship with the hypermarket. Social proximity is an efficient lever to build loyalty in Thailand. In addition, retailers could utilise certainty and steadiness message as a way to build shopper loyalty. Originality/value This research underlines the social, human dimension that consumers seek, which is opposed to the online purchase. Specifically, this study highlights the mediating role of social proximity between the relationship of cultural variables and loyalty in the retail context. Additionally, this research displays the direct and positive effects of culture on retail loyalty. That is, this paper enhances how culture and shopper-retail staff interaction can be managed to achieve store loyalty.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The non-significant direct impact of destination image on loyalty may be related to the research background, sample selection, cultural differences, and differences in loyalty measurement methods.
“which may be related to the research background, sample selection, cultural differences, and differences in loyalty measurement methods (Charinsarn et al., 2023; Qi et al., 2023).”
From A study on the influence of rural tourism’s perceived destination restorative qualities on loyalty based on SOR model (2025) · cites this paper as Charinsarn et al., 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 91 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Charinsarn, A. R., Diallo, M. F., & Lambey-Checchin, C.
- Affiliations
- Thammasat University (TH)
- Université de Lille (FR)
- Université Clermont Auvergne (FR)
- Venue
- International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2023-03-02
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 523-545
- ISSN
- 0959-0552 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4322632355
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Keywords
- customer loyalty, cultural dimensions, social proximity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation, collectivism, hypermarkets, loyalty programs, emerging markets, Thailand, Tesco
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review