Cited by 11Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesWorkplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

An integrative literature review exploring the impact of alcohol workplace policies

Open access
Alfred, Lolita, Limmer, Mark, Cartwright, Susan·2020·International Journal of Workplace Health Management

Abstract

Purpose: Alcohol workplace policies (AWPs) can help organizations to manage and support employees with alcohol-related problems. Over the last two decades, there has been a slow but steady rise of research on AWPs with some indication that these can contribute to reducing employee excessive consumption. However, there does not appear to be any empirical literature reviews to consolidate and evaluate what this body of evidence says regarding the impact of these policies. The following review seeks to address this gap. Design/methodology/approach: Five electronic databases were searched for papers published between January 1996 and January 2020. To capture additional relevant papers (including those from non-peer reviewed sources), the search was extended to Google Scholar, professional and human resource management websites, trade publications and the website of one United Kingdom (UK)-based alcohol charity. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to systematically screen the paper titles, abstracts and full-text records. 14 papers were deemed eligible and therefore included in the integrative review. After extracting data, all 14 papers were appraised for quality and then analysed using the narrative synthesis guide by Popay et al. (2006). Findings: Five themes were identified, namely, Associations between Policy and Consumption Levels/Patterns, Deterrence, Policy and Programme Type, Knowledge and Understanding and Enforcement and Discipline. These themes encapsulated what the included papers concluded about the impact and associated benefits or challenges of AWPs. Research limitations/implications: This review identifies that despite the benefits of AWPs, up to 40% of workplaces do not have these policies in place. Future research needs to explicitly explore the reasons for this. Practical implications: This review highlights that AWPs can benefit employees and workplaces. Therefore, organizations are encouraged to develop and implement AWPs to support health improvement and prevention of alcohol problems in the workplace. Originality/value: This review provides a current synthesis of literature published over the last two decades regarding the impact of AWPs on employees and workplaces.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijwhm-10-2019-0130

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Superficial lesions affecting the skin and those affecting higher and lower extremities, and the chest were reported, reflecting the nature of the physical labor done in the construction sector.

    “As for the affected body parts, superficial lesions affecting the skin and those affecting higher and lower extremities, and the chest were reported reflecting the nature of the physical labor done in the construction sector (Di Domenico et al. 2022; Šoštarič et al. 2021; Sherratt et al. 2020).”

    From Impact of risk mitigation strategies on non-fatal injuries in the construction sector in qatar: a retrospective analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Sherratt et al. 2020

    The Strengths and Limitations passages discuss occupational injury incidence in construction and the effects of workplace alcohol and drug policies, but do not identify injured body parts or lesion types. Searches for superficial lesions, skin, extremities, and chest found no passage addressing the claimed injury pattern. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Adams, R.J., Smart, P. and Sigismund Huff, A. (2016) 'Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies', International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 1-23.
  2. Baggott, R. (2011) Public health policy and practice, 2 nd Edition. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan
  3. Bush, D.M. and Lipari, R.N. (2014) Workplace Policies and Programs Concerning Alcohol and Drug Use. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; Rockville. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK384657/ [Accessed 21 February 2018]
  4. Cheng, W.J. and Cheng, Y. (2016) Alcohol drinking behaviours and alcohol management policies under outsourcing work conditions: A qualitative study of construction workers in Taiwan. International Journal of Drug Policy, 43-47.
  5. Eriksson, M., Olsson, B. and Osberg, J. (2004) Alcohol Prevention in the Swedish Workplace-Who Cares?. Contemporary Drug Problems, 31(2), 263-285, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009145090403100205. · DOI
  6. Elling, D.L., Wennberg, P., Almquist, Y.B., and Sundqvist, K., (2020) Workplace alcohol prevention: are managers' individual characteristics associated with organisational alcohol policy knowledge and inclination to initiate early alcohol interventions? International Journal of Workplace Health Management. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-09-2019-0118 · DOI
  7. Kelly, M.P. and Barker, M. (2016) Why is changing health related behaviour so difficult? Journal of Public Health, 136, 109-116.
  8. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J. and the PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement, PLoS Medicine, 6(6), e1000097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097. · DOI
  9. Moore, R.S., Ames, G.M., Cunradi, C.B. and Duke, M.R. (2012) Alcohol Policy Comprehension, Compliance, and Consequences Among Young Adult Restaurant Workers. Journal of Workplace Behavioural Health, 27(3), 181-195
  10. Paton, N. (2012). Lack of workplace alcohol policies has detrimental effect on economy. Occupational Health, 64(3), 7.
  11. Pidd, K., Boeckmann, R. and Morris, M. (2006) 'Adolescents in transition: The role of workplace alcohol and other drug policies as a prevention strategy'. Drugs Education Prevention and Policy, 13(4), 353-365,
  12. Pidd, K., Kostadinov, V. and Roche, A. (2016) 'Do workplace policies work? An examination of the relationship between alcohol and other drug policies and workers' substance use'. International Journal of Drug Policy, 28, 48-54
  13. Pidd, K. and Roche, A. (2014) 'How effective is drug testing as a workplace strategy? a systematic review of the evidence', Accident Analysis and Prevention, 71, 154-165.
  14. Pidd, K., Roche, A., Cameron, J., Lee, N., Jenner, L. and Duraisingam, V. (2018) 'Workplace alcohol harm reduction intervention in Australia: Cluster non-randomised controlled trial', Drug and Alcohol Review, 37(4), 502-513.
  15. Rehm, J., Mathers, C., Popova, S., Thavorncharoensap, M., Teerawattananon, Y. and Patra, J. (2009) 'Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders', Lancet, 373(9682), 2223.
  16. Rose, G (1981) Strategy of prevention: lessons from cardiovascular disease. British Medical Journal, 282, p1847-1851. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1506445/pdf/bmjcred00661-0031.pdf [Accessed 28 January 2020]
  17. Schiavo, J and Foster, M.J. (2017) Planning the review: part 1-the reference interview. In M.J. Foster and S.T. Jewel (eds) Assembling the pieces of a systematic review: a guide for librarians. London: Rowan and Littlefield The Standard (2012) Understanding presenteeism: Productivity Insight # 3. Portland: The Standard. https://www.standard.com/eforms/16541.pdf [accessed 25 July 2018].
  18. Watson, H., Godfrey,C., McFadyen, A., McArthur, K., Stevenson, M., & Holloway, A. (2015) Screening and brief intervention delivery in the workplace to reduce alcohol related harm: A pilot randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies 52, p39-48. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0020748914001709?token=09462D6475635E5 29DDD2EC1D5B766074041DD115F9C16C4BD77146A236D5F06A2C17204C9F366245EAEB4 E0A350E2E4 [Accessed 18 July 2020)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alfred, L., Limmer, M., & Cartwright, S.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Workplace Health Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-12-04
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
87-110
ISSN
1753-8351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108530464
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Workplace Health Management (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
alcohol-related problems, deterrence, workplace health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review