Cited by 72Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

PLS–SEM in business promotion strategies. A multigroup analysis of mobile coupon users using MICOM

Carranza, Rocío, Díaz, Estrella, Martín-Consuegra, David, Fernández-Ferrín, Pilar·2020·Industrial Management & Data Systems

Abstract

Purpose The development of Information Systems (IS) and Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) is offering new opportunities for businesses to implement promotion strategies focused on customer attraction and retention. In this sense, mobile coupon usage has increased as a promotion tool, especially in the fast-food sector. However, the use by consumers of these coupons is not homogeneous and it is conditioned by prior experience. Thus, this study aimed to examine variations between Fast Food Restaurant (FFR) customers based on their prior experiences with the use of mobile coupon (expert vs novice users). Design/methodology/approach A sample of 400 fast-food customers was collected using a structured questionnaire. In order to compare the proposed relationships between expert and novice users, a multigroup approach was applied through new, recently proposed evaluation procedures designed for PLS–SEM. Findings The results show that the two groups of consumers (expert vs novice users) have notable differences regarding the relationship between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. This relationship was the strongest in both groups. However, there are no differences found in other aspects considered as antecedents to mobile coupons usage, for instance, usage intention and attitude. Practical implications This work emphasises the importance of considering differences based on experience between mobile coupon users. Ease of use, perceived consumer utility and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/imds-12-2019-0726

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Carranza, R., Díaz, E., Martín-Consuegra, D., & Fernández-Ferrín, P.
Affiliations
University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Venue
Industrial Management & Data Systems
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-08-19
Volume
120
Issue
12
Pages
2349-2374
ISSN
0263-5577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3071195536
Cited by
72
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial Management & Data Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Re-Unir (International University of La Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • RUIdeRA - Institutional University Repository (University of Castilla-La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
mobile coupons, fast food restaurants, user experience, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, intention to use, consumer attitudes, MICOM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review