Cited by 161Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInnovative Human-Technology InteractionConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

User acceptance of media tablets: An empirical examination of perceived value

Yu, Jieun, Lee, Hwansoo, Ha, Imsook, Zo, Hangjung·2017·Telematics and Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2015.11.004

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, J., Lee, H., Ha, I., & Zo, H.
Affiliations
  • Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR)
  • Dankook University (KR)
  • Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute (KR)
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Hwansoo
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
206-223
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2220002701
Cited by
161
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8
FWCI
17.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
user acceptance, perceived value, perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment, social image, risk perception, brand names, product design, functionality, content, price, personal innovativeness, technology adoption, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review