CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 315Artificial Intelligence in EducationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT

Tiwari, Chandan Kumar, Bhat, Mohd. Abass, Khan, Shagufta Tariq, Subramaniam, Rajaswaminathan, Khan, Mohammad Atif Irshad·2024·Interactive Technology and Smart Education
DOI 10.1108/itse-04-2023-0061
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the factors determining students’ attitude toward using newly emerged artificial intelligence (AI) tool, Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), for educational and learning purpose based on technology acceptance model. Design/methodology/approach The recommended model was empirically tested with partial least squares structural equation modeling using 375 student survey responses. Findings The study revealed that students have a favorable view of the instructional use of ChatGPT. Usefulness, social presence and legitimacy of the tool, as well as enjoyment and motivation, contribute to a favorable attitude toward using this tool in a learning environment. However, perceived ease of use was not found to be a significant determinant in the adoption and utilization of ChatGPT by the students. Practical implications This research is intended to benefit enterprises, academic institutions and the global community by offering light on how students perceive the ChatGPT service in an educational setting. Furthermore, the application enhances confidence and interest among learners, leading to improved literacy and general awareness. Eventually, the outcome of this research will help AI developers to improve their product and service delivery, as well as benefit regulators in regulating the usage of AI-based bots. Originality/value Due to its novelty, the current research on AI-based ChatGPT usage in the education sector is rather restricted. This study provides the adoption aspects of ChatGPT, a new AI-based technology for students, thereby contributing significantly to the existing research on the adoption of advanced education technologies. In addition, the literature lacks research on the adoption of ChatGPT by students for educational purposes; this study addresses this gap by identifying adoption determinants of ChatGPT in education.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/itse-04-2023-0061

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 109 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 1989, Attitude structure and behavior, 241
  2. 2022, Impact of Job Burnout on Performance: A Study among Hospital Employees of J&K, India, 1
  3. ChatGPT, 2022, ChatGPT: optimizing language models for dialogue
  4. 2023, Unlocking the potential of ChatGPT: a comprehensive exploration of its applications, advantages, Limitations, and Future Directions in Natural Language Processing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–315 of 315

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tiwari, C. K., Bhat, M. A., Khan, S. T., Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. A. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Muscat (OM)
  • German University of Technology (OM)
ORCID
Venue
Interactive Technology and Smart Education
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2023-08-29
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
333-355
ISSN
1741-5659 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/itse-04-2023-0061
OpenAlex
W4386178880
Cited by
315
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 9
FWCI
73.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
Interactive Technology and Smart Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
ChatGPT, generative AI in education, student attitudes, technology acceptance, technology adoption, perceived usefulness, social presence, perceived legitimacy, enjoyment, motivation, perceived ease of use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review