Vancouver pre-1940 houses: a cache for old-growth forest wood
Abstract
Purpose Single-family houses in Vancouver that were built prior to 1940 are a cache of wood from British Columbia (BC) old-growth forests. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the environmental and heritage values of maintaining this finite resource, assess the current policy and regulatory efforts of the City of Vancouver to save this resource and recommend further opportunities to improve and expedite these efforts. Design/methodology/approach Using the City of Vancouver as a case study, this paper identifies effective policy practices to encourage and facilitate salvaging and reusing old wood resources. Additionally, the paper discusses the key challenges and risks that need to be addressed for these policy approaches to succeed. Findings Pre-1940 houses constitute about 40 percent of single-family houses that have been demolished in Vancouver in the past few years. The City of Vancouver enacted the Green Demolition Bylaw in 2014 requiring a minimum of 75 percent diversion of demolition waste. However, wood from these houses has been mainly chipped and recycled as biomass fuel or landscape mulch rather than reused. The result shows that regulatory enforcement along with support for infrastructure development may be crucial to protect the remainder of this valuable heritage resource. Originality/value This paper considers the environmental and heritage values of wood elements used in old houses and recommends further policy and regulatory interventions to maximize wood s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Deconstruction of wood-framed houses: Material recovery and environmental impact
Diyamandoglu, V., & Fortuna, L. M. (2015) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.04.006 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Engineering properties of douglas-fir lumber reclaimed from deconstructed buildings
Falk, R., Maul, D., Cramer, S., Evans, J., & Herian, V. (2008) · doi:10.2737/fpl-rp-650 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unbuilding the city: Deconstruction and the circular economy in Vancouver
Lynch, N. (2022) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x221116891 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“While the hub will clearly facilitate the exchange of salvaged materials (e.g. inspection, standardization, remanufacture and sale), its role as a centre for knowledge and cultural exchange is paramount (Interview 1) (see also, Teshnizi, 2020).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Teshnizi, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Teshnizi, Zahra
- Venue
- Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-12-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-51
- ISSN
- 2044-1266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2994880611
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Construction Management and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Development and Cultural Heritage
- Keywords
- wood reuse, demolition waste, cultural heritage preservation, urban forestry, biomass fuel, regulatory enforcement, City of Vancouver, single-family house
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review