Cited by 13Indoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesRFID technology advancementsHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

Towards an efficient indoor navigation system: a near field communication approach

Sakpere, Wilson E., Mlitwa, Nhlanhla Boyfriend Wilton, Oshin, Michael Adeyeye·2017·Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology

Abstract

Purpose This research aims to focus on providing interventions to alleviate usability challenges to strengthen the overall accuracy and the navigation effectiveness in indoor and stringent environments through the experiential manipulation of technical attributes of the positioning and navigation system. Design/methodology/approach The study followed a quantitative and experimental method of empirical enquiry and software engineering and synthesis research methods. The study further entails three implementation processes, namely, map generation, positioning framework and navigation service using a prototype mobile navigation application that uses the near field communication (NFC) technology. Findings The approach and findings revealed that the capability of NFC in leveraging its low-cost infrastructure of passive tags, its availability in mobile devices and the ubiquity of the mobile device provided a cost-effective solution with impressive accuracy and usability. The positioning accuracy achieved was less than 9 cm. The usability improved from 44 to 96 per cent based on feedbacks given by respondents who tested the application in an indoor environment. These showed that NFC is a viable alternative to resolve the challenges identified in previous solutions and technologies. Research limitations/implications The major limitation of the navigation application was that there is no real-time update of user position. This can be investigated and extended further by using NFC in a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jedt-10-2016-0073

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 13

Authors
Sakpere, W. E., Mlitwa, N. B. W., & Oshin, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Zululand (ZA)
Venue
Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2017-08-07
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
505-527
ISSN
1726-0531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2715040563
Cited by
13
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › RFID technology advancements
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
indoor navigation, near field communication, indoor positioning, mobile navigation application, hybrid positioning, RFID, Bluetooth, wireless LAN, map generation, OpenStreetMap, usability, positioning accuracy, underground navigation, real-time localization, path planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review