Influence of political leaders on sustainable development goals–insights from twitter
Abstract
Purpose The importance and criticality of sustainable development goals is witnessed by 195 member countries. For its full-fledged adoption and implementation, it needs to be understood by masses and political leaders are critical agents those engage diverse communities through social media such as twitter. Therefore, in this study focuses on how political leaders can influence the sustainable development goals through Twitter. Design/methodology/approach This study examines the social media conversations of political leaders on Twitter. Social media analytics methods such as sentiment mining, topic modelling and content analysis-based methods have been used. Findings The findings indicate that most political leaders are primarily discussing the sustainable development goals (SDGs) “partnership for goals” and “peace, justice and strong institutions”. Many other goals such as “clean water and sanitation”, “life below water”, “zero hunger”, “no poverty” and “educational quality” are not being focused on. Research limitations/implications This study offers implications in terms of collective decision making and the role of policy makers towards the goals of promoting SDGs. The authors highlight how political leaders need to involve key stakeholders in this journey. Originality/value This study scores and provides a cohort-specific prioritization of the leadership within these countries with regard to SDGs, which could be beneficial to the society.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Influencers like CEOs and national heads can enable information sharing and subsequent adoption of sustainable initiatives among social media followers.
“| 10 | Influencers like CEOs and national | Grover et al. (2019), Grover et al. |”
From Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022) · cites this paper as Grover et al. (2021)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Gupta, S., & Modgil, S.
- Affiliations
- International Management Institute (IN)
- Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
- NEOMA Business School (FR)
- Venue
- Journal of Enterprise Information Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-03-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1893-1916
- ISSN
- 1741-0398 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-7409
- OpenAlex
- W3134386132
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Enterprise Information Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Human Rights and Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Keywords
- Sustainable Development Goals, political leaders, Twitter, social media discourse, political leadership, SDG prioritization, sentiment analysis, topic modeling, stakeholder engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review