The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a survey of the empirical literature on environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) estimation of carbon dioxide (CO 2) emissions over the period of 1991–2017. Design/methodology/approach: This survey categorizes the studies on the basis of power of income in empirical models of EKC. It has been hypothesized that the EKC shows an inverted U-shaped association between economic growth and CO 2 emissions. Findings: For all the contexts, the results of EKC estimation for CO 2 emissions are inconclusive in nature. The reasons behind this discrepancy can be attributed to the choice of contexts, time period, explanatory variables, and methodological adaptation. Research limitations/implications: The future studies in this context should not only consider new set of variables (e.g. corruption index, social indicators, political scenario, energy research and development expenditures, foreign capital inflows, happiness, population education structure, public investment toward alternate energy exploration, etc.), but also the data set should be refined, so that the EKC estimation issues raised by Stern (2004) can be addressed. Originality/value: By far, no study in the literature of ecological economics has focused on the empirical estimation of EKC for CO 2 emissions. This particular context has been used for this study, as CO 2 is one of the highest studied pollutants in the ecological economics, and especially within the EKC hypothesis framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve
Stern, D. I. (2004) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004 · Cited by 4,013
Shi, A. (2003) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00223-9 · Cited by 671
Cited by
Alola, A. A., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139 · Cited by 835
Sharif, A., Baris-Tuzemen, O., Uzuner, G., Ozturk, I., & Sinha, A. (2020) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138 · Cited by 803
Self-citationShahbaz, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., & Sinha, A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.282 · Cited by 615
Self-citationLe, H. P., & Ozturk, I. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2 · Cited by 528
Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., & Khan, D. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2615 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahbaz, M., & Sinha, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Studies
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-01-07
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 106-168
- ISSN
- 0144-3585 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799657995
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 87.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jes-09-2017-0249
- The paper
- Shahbaz, M., & Sinha, A. (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-09-2017-0249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.