Cited by 81Sharing Economy and PlatformsConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Motivations and obstacles for fashion renting: a cross-cultural comparison

Open access
Lang, Chunmin, Seo, Sukyung, Liu, Chuanlan·2019·Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the influences of perceived enjoyment, perceived risks and attitude on the intention to rent fashion products for both Chinese and American consumers. Furthermore, this study is expected to empirically identify the differences between American and Chinese consumers in terms of motivations for and barriers to fashion renting. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected through online surveys in both the USA and China. Data cleaning generated 412 usable samples in the USA and 301 usable responses in China. A series of t-test analyses and structural equation modeling were conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. Findings Statistical results confirmed the positive influences of perceived enjoyment and attitude on fashion renting intention. In addition, the negative influences of perceived performance risk and social risk on attitude were also affirmed. Moreover, the results indicated that significant differences exist between American and Chinese consumers in terms of perceived risks and enjoyment of fashion renting, as well as attitude toward renting. Further, group comparison testing results discovered that differences existed in the factors influencing the intention to rent fashion products between American and Chinese consumers. Originality/value This study initiates the attempt to investigate the motivations and obstacles for fashion renting intention for both American and Chinese consumers. The cultural comparison between Chinese and American consumers also delivers a comprehensive understanding of the motivations and obstacles behind the intention of fashion renting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jfmm-05-2019-0106

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 81

Authors
Lang, C., Seo, S., & Liu, C.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Venue
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-09-19
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
519-536
ISSN
1361-2026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969450143
Cited by
81
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
perceived enjoyment, risk perception, performance risk, social risk, consumer attitudes, cross-cultural consumer comparison, Chinese consumers, United States consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review