Motivations and obstacles for fashion renting: a cross-cultural comparison
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the influences of perceived enjoyment, perceived risks and attitude on the intention to rent fashion products for both Chinese and American consumers. Furthermore, this study is expected to empirically identify the differences between American and Chinese consumers in terms of motivations for and barriers to fashion renting. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected through online surveys in both the USA and China. Data cleaning generated 412 usable samples in the USA and 301 usable responses in China. A series of t-test analyses and structural equation modeling were conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. Findings Statistical results confirmed the positive influences of perceived enjoyment and attitude on fashion renting intention. In addition, the negative influences of perceived performance risk and social risk on attitude were also affirmed. Moreover, the results indicated that significant differences exist between American and Chinese consumers in terms of perceived risks and enjoyment of fashion renting, as well as attitude toward renting. Further, group comparison testing results discovered that differences existed in the factors influencing the intention to rent fashion products between American and Chinese consumers. Originality/value This study initiates the attempt to investigate the motivations and obstacles for fashion renting intention for both American and Chinese consumers. The cultural comparison between Chinese and American consumers also delivers a comprehensive understanding of the motivations and obstacles behind the intention of fashion renting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In sustainable apparel, distinct risks have different effects and work through attitudes as a mediator.
“In sustainable apparel, on the other hand, distinct risks (financial, performance, psychological, and social) have different effects and work through attitudes as a mediator [27].”
From Substantiated vs. Vague Circular Economy Claims in Fashion Brands: Claim Support Credibility, Authenticity, and Trust in Greece vs. the UK (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
In fashion renting, financial, performance, and psychological risks lower attitudes and perceived enjoyment, which then predict adoption intention.
“For example, in fashion renting, financial, performance, and psychological risks lower attitudes and perceived enjoyment, which then predict adoption intention [26,27].”
From Substantiated vs. Vague Circular Economy Claims in Fashion Brands: Claim Support Credibility, Authenticity, and Trust in Greece vs. the UK (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Cross-national research indicates that context shapes what consumers treat as informative, credible, and actionable signals.
“Cross-national research indicates that sustainability claims are not decoded in a vacuum; instead, context shapes what consumers treat as informative, credible, and actionable signals [27,33,50-52].”
From Substantiated vs. Vague Circular Economy Claims in Fashion Brands: Claim Support Credibility, Authenticity, and Trust in Greece vs. the UK (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
The effects of performance risk differ depending on the circular form and cultural orientation.
“For example, the effects of performance risk differ depending on the circular form and cultural orientation [26,27], and market cues can sometimes help with quality uncertainty [29-31].”
From Substantiated vs. Vague Circular Economy Claims in Fashion Brands: Claim Support Credibility, Authenticity, and Trust in Greece vs. the UK (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Lang, C., Seo, S., & Liu, C.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-09-19
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 519-536
- ISSN
- 1361-2026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2969450143
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- repository.lsu.edu
- Locations
- Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- perceived enjoyment, risk perception, performance risk, social risk, consumer attitudes, cross-cultural consumer comparison, Chinese consumers, United States consumers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review