Cited by 82Environmental Sustainability in BusinessConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorCultural and Historical Studies

A study of consumer choice between sustainable and non-sustainable apparel cues in Poland

Rahman, Osmud, Koszewska, Małgorzata·2020·Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to expand the existing knowledge on fashion consumption in general and age/gender effects on clothing choice in particular. This study was undertaken to empirically examine the importance of various sustainable and non-sustainable apparel cues, as well as the functional, aesthetic, symbolic, financial, environmental and social/ethical aspects of clothing. Although Poland's economy has been transformed remarkably over the last decade, there is still a paucity of empirical research focusing on this area has been conducted. Design/methodology/approach A self-administered online survey was employed for this study. Twenty product cues (10 non-sustainable cues and 10 sustainable), eight items of ‘environmental commitment and behaviour’ measuring scale and demographic questions were used for data collection and empirical testing. Findings A total of 288 useable surveys were collected for analysis. The results revealed that many Polish consumers would not purchase a sustainable or ‘green’ product if it did not provide enough aesthetic, functional and financial benefits to satisfy their needs and aspirations. Women were more reliant on garment fit and style than men. Our findings underscore several meaningful implications and useful information. Sustainable fashion is not merely about environmental, social and ethical benefits, but their aesthetic, functional, symbolic and financial values must be factored in as well. Originality/value There is lim…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jfmm-11-2019-0258

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 69 · Cited by 82

Authors
Rahman, O., & Koszewska, M.
Affiliations
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
  • Lodz University of Technology (PL)
Venue
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-05-27
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
213-234
ISSN
1361-2026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3028801671
Cited by
82
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cultural and Historical Studies
Keywords
sustainable fashion, consumer choice, green purchasing, age effects, gender differences, clothing choice, aesthetic benefits, functional benefits, symbolic value, environmental commitment, ethical consumption, Poland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review