A study of consumer choice between sustainable and non-sustainable apparel cues in Poland
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to expand the existing knowledge on fashion consumption in general and age/gender effects on clothing choice in particular. This study was undertaken to empirically examine the importance of various sustainable and non-sustainable apparel cues, as well as the functional, aesthetic, symbolic, financial, environmental and social/ethical aspects of clothing. Although Poland's economy has been transformed remarkably over the last decade, there is still a paucity of empirical research focusing on this area has been conducted. Design/methodology/approach A self-administered online survey was employed for this study. Twenty product cues (10 non-sustainable cues and 10 sustainable), eight items of ‘environmental commitment and behaviour’ measuring scale and demographic questions were used for data collection and empirical testing. Findings A total of 288 useable surveys were collected for analysis. The results revealed that many Polish consumers would not purchase a sustainable or ‘green’ product if it did not provide enough aesthetic, functional and financial benefits to satisfy their needs and aspirations. Women were more reliant on garment fit and style than men. Our findings underscore several meaningful implications and useful information. Sustainable fashion is not merely about environmental, social and ethical benefits, but their aesthetic, functional, symbolic and financial values must be factored in as well. Originality/value There is lim…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The result may reflect a degree of loss of apparel buyers' consumer faith and credibility in the generic 'organic' term.
“Thus, this result may reflect a degree of loss of apparel buyers' consumer faith and credibility in this generic term, which has been reported in some research [55,60].”
From Marketing Tactics for Sustainable Fashion and the Circular Economy: The Impact of Ethical Labels on Fast Fashion Choice (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 69 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Rahman, O., & Koszewska, M.
- Affiliations
- Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
- Lodz University of Technology (PL)
- Venue
- Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-05-27
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-234
- ISSN
- 1361-2026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3028801671
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 11.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cultural and Historical Studies
- Keywords
- sustainable fashion, consumer choice, green purchasing, age effects, gender differences, clothing choice, aesthetic benefits, functional benefits, symbolic value, environmental commitment, ethical consumption, Poland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review