Cited by 17Digital Marketing and Social MediaDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchMedia and Digital Communication

Influencing the follower behavior: the role of homophily and perceived usefulness, credibility and enjoyability of travel content

Machado Carvalho, Maria Amélia·2024·Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights

Abstract

Purpose: The study examines how the three dimensions of homophily (attitude, background, and value) influence the perceived usefulness, credibility, and enjoyability of travel content and follower behavior (i.e. willingness to search for more information and intention to visit the destination and purchase the tourism product). Likewise, the study investigates how content perception influences follower behavior. Design/methodology/approach: A sample of 621 Instagram users from generations Y and Z who follow at least one travel influencer and intend to travel in the next twelve months was collected through an online survey. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was adopted to examine the data. Findings: Attitudinal homophily influences follower behavior, value homophily impacts content perception, and background homophily has a counterproductive effect. Likewise, content perceived as useful and credible induces the intention to visit and purchase the tourism product. Research limitations/implications: The generalization of the results must be performed with care, as the context of analysis is limited to a social platform and only includes Portuguese individuals. Practical implications: The findings help managers better understand which homophily cues influence content perception and maximize influencer persuasion. Based on the results, they can better decide which travel influencers should endorse their tourism products. Originality/value: Research on homophily has neglected the multidimensionality of the concept and its analysis in the tourism context. By using a consolidated approach to homophily, content perception, and follower behavior, this study contributes to the tourism marketing literature and expands influencer marketing research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jhti-09-2023-0648

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tourists who are highly influenced by an influencer's recommendation of a specific destination have their decision to visit directly linked to seeing an influencer's post, vlog, or story about a destination.

    “Destination Selection Intentions Tourists who are highly influenced by an influencer's recommendation of a specific destination.Their decision to visit is directly linked to seeing an influencer's post, vlog, or story about a destination”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Machado Carvalho, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2024-04-03
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
1091-1110
ISSN
2514-9792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393523086
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3
FWCI
12.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
homophily, travel influencers, Instagram, follower behavior, perceived usefulness, credibility, visit intention, purchase intention, influencer marketing, tourism marketing, millennials, Generation Z, attitude homophily

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review