The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The engagement of social media technologies by undergraduate informatics students for academic purpose in Malaysia
Abstract
Purpose: – This study aims to investigate the perceptions, acceptance, usage and access to social media by students and academics in higher education in informatics programs in Malaysia. A conceptual model based on Connectivism and communities of practice (CoPs) learning theory was developed and were used as a basis of mapping the research questions to the design frameworks and the research outcomes. A significant outcome of this study will be the development of a design framework for implementing social media as supporting tools for student engagement and teaching and learning of informatics programs in higher education institutions (HEIs) in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach: – A mixed-method research methodology with a significant survey research component was employed for this research. This methodology focused on collecting and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data to better understand the research problems. For this study, a mixed-method sequential transformative research strategy based on a QUAN-Qual model was used in the data collection process. Mixed-method research methodology is considered to be most appropriate for this study, as it allows the researcher to gather multiple forms of data from diverse audiences such as educators, administrators and students. Findings: – The findings show the close matched of the ownership, amount of hours spent online, types of social media technologies (SMTs) used and pattern of usage between informatics and non-informatics students. It also shows that many students and instructors have started to explore and accept the use of SMTs as a tool for engaging with their institution and their peers as well as for teaching and learning purposes. Innovative institutions need to understand the critical success factors and the barriers that restrict the implementation of SMTs within the HEI to take advantage of the opportunities offered by SMTs in higher education. Research limitations/implications: – The surveys and interview participant, in part, are self-selecting, so the data collected cannot be claimed to be representative of the population. However, because of the relatively large number of participants, it can be considered that the findings are indicative. Other limitation includes the depth of data that can be collected using this methodology. Practical implications: – There is wide range of social media usage in educational settings now being reported, but many issues are still unexamined. Limited studies have been focusing on the educators’ readiness, acceptance or refusal in integrating social media into their courses, the perceived effectiveness of the tools and student outcomes for their learning. The central outcome of this research will be the development of a design framework that will be used as a guide for Malaysian HEIs and informatics academics to engage students using SMTs in creating effective learning communities for informatics programs. Social implications: – The framework will have implication for the social interaction and engagement of students with their institution. Originality/value: – Very little work has been reported on student and academic engagement, their perspectives and perceived effectiveness of social media usage in higher education, especially in the Malaysia context. Most of the research focused only on the quantitative research with students from universities in the USA and Australia, with an emphasis mainly on student’s perception and acceptance. There are calls for more research to examine how social media is perceived and accepted by students and academics for teaching and learning, especially in Malaysia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research ndings revealed that in Asian nations, social media as tools for informal collaboration are used by a high number of educators, mostly for the purpose of communication and social networking, instead of utilizing it for the process of Students' academic performance [15].”
From Integrated Three Theories to Develop a Model of Factors Affecting Students' Academic Performance in Higher Education (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
Tajudeen Shittu, A., Madarsha Basha, K., Suryani Nik AbdulRahman, N., & Badariah Tunku Ahmad, T. (2011) · Multicultural Education & Technology Journal · doi:10.1108/17504971111166929 · Cited by 66
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Abdul Hamid, N. , Ishak, M.S. , Ismail, S.A. and Mohmad Yazam, S.Y.N. (2013), “Social media and the new academic environment: pedagogical challenges”, Social Media Usage among University Students in Malaysia, IGI Global, pp. 244-255.
- Al-Rahmi, W.M. , Othman, M.S. and Musa, N.A. (2014), “The improvement of students’ academic performance by using social media through collaborative learning in Malaysian higher education”, Asian Social Science, Vol. 10 No. 8, pp. 210-221.
- Al-Rahmi, W.M. and Othman, M.S. (Undated), “The impact of social media use on academic performance among university students: a pilot study”, Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 108-120.
- Anderson, P. (2007), What is Web 2.0?: Ideas, Technologies and Implications for Education, Vol. 1 No. 1, JISC, Bristol.
- Bennett, S. , Maton, K. and Kervin, L. (2008), “The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence”, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 775-786. · DOI · Paper page
- Bennett, S. and Maton, K. (2010), “Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 26, pp. 321-331, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. · DOI
- Boitshwarelo, B. (2011), “Proposing an integrated research framework for connectivism: utilizing theoretical synergies”, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol. 12 No. 3, available at: www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewFile/881/1830# · DOI
- Brown, T.H. (2006), “Beyond constructivism: navigationism in the knowledge era”, On the Horizon, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 108-120. · DOI
- Corrin, L. , Bennett, S. and Lockyer, L. (2010), “Digital natives: every day's life versus academic study”, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 643-650, available at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1214&context=edupapers · DOI
- Creswell, J.H. (2003), Research Design – Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd ed., SAGE Publications, pp. 96-100.
- Dabbas, N. and Kitsantas, A. (2012), “Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning”, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 3-8. · DOI
- Eijkman, H. (2008), “Web 2.0 as a non-foundational network-centric learning space”, Campus-Wide Information Systems, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 93-104. · DOI
- Frand, J. (2000), “The information-age mindset: changes in students and implications for higher education”, EDUCAUSE Review, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 14-24.
- Hamat, A. , Embi, M.A. and Abu Hasan, H. (2012a), “The use of social networking sites among Malaysian university students”, International Education Studies, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 56-66. · DOI
- Hamat, A. , Embi, M.A. and Abu Hasan, H. (2012b), “Top-performing students’ use of social networking sites”, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 361-369. · DOI
- Hrastinkski, S. and Aghaee, N.M. (2011), “How are campus students using social media to support their studies? An explorative interview study”, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 451-464. · DOI
- Kennedy, G. , Judd, T. , Dalgarno, B. and Waycott, J. (2010), “Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 332-343. · DOI
- McLoughlin, C. and Lee, M.J.W. (2010), “Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software”, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 28-43. · DOI
- Margaryan, A. , Littlejohn, A. and Vojt, G. (2011), “Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies”, Computers and Education, Vol. 56, pp. 429-440, available at: www.unil.ch/webdav/site/magellan/shared/Are_digital_natives_a_myth_or_reality_.pdf · DOI
- Merchant, G. (2012), “Mobile practices in everyday life: popular digital technologies and schooling revisited”, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 43 No. 5, pp. 770-782. · DOI
- Selwyn, N. (2010), “Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 65-73. · DOI
- Tapscott, D. (2008), Grown up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, p. -.
- Tess, P.A. (2013), “The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – a literature review”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. A60-A68.
- Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. -. · DOI · Paper page
- Davis, C.H.F. , Deil-Amen, R. , Rios-Aguilar, C. and Gonzalez Canche, M.S. (2012), “Social media in higher education – a literature review and research directions”, The Center for the Study of Higher Education at The University of Arizona and Claremont Graduate University, available at: www.academia.edu/1220569/Social_Media_in_Higher_Education_A_Literature_Review_and_Research_Directions
Cited by
Alalwan, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alfarraj, O., Alzahrani, A., Yahaya, N., & Al-Rahmi, A. M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2928142 · Cited by 141
Huda, M. (2019) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-09-2017-0044 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- See Yin Lim, J., Agostinho, S., Harper, B., & Chicharo, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Wollongong (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2014-08-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 177-194
- ISSN
- 1477-996X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064737740
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
- Keywords
- social media in higher education, computer science students, student engagement, connectivism, communities of practice, social media use patterns, technology acceptance, learning communities, Malaysian higher education institutions, academic social media use, informatics education, student-faculty interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review