The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Alexa, define empowerment”: voice assistants at home, appropriation and technoperformances
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper aims to show how the production of meaning is a matter of people interacting with technologies, throughout their appropriation and in co-performances. The researchers rely on the case of household-based voice assistants that endorse speaking as a primary mode of interaction with technologies. By analyzing the ethical significance of voice assistants as co-producers of moral meaning intervening in the material and socio-cultural space of the home, the paper invites their informed and critical use as a form of (re-)empowerment while acknowledging their productive role in human values. Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an empirically informed philosophical analysis. Using the conceptual frameworks of technological appropriation and human–technological performances, while drawing on the interviews with voice assistants’ users and literature studies, this paper unravels the meaning-making processes in relation to these technologies in the household use. It additionally draws on a Wittgensteinian perspective to attend to the productive role of language and link to wider cultural meanings. Findings: By combining two approaches, appropriation and technoperformances, and analyzing the themes of privacy, power and knowledge, the paper shows how voice assistants help to shape a specific moral subject: embodied in space and made as it performatively responds to the device and makes sense of it together with others. Originality/value: The researchers show how through making sense of technologies in appropriation and performatively responding to them, people can change and intervene in the power structures that technologies suggest.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most researchers have primarily studied group voice assistant use in home settings with children and parents.
“Since most researchers have primarily studied group voice assistant use in home settings with children and parents [2,14,17,18], we encourage future work to explore VA group use in community living.”
From Studying Exploration & Long-Term Use of Voice Assistants by Older Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x · Cited by 670
Technology Games: Using Wittgenstein for Understanding and Evaluating Technology
Coeckelbergh, M. (2018) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9953-8 · Cited by 56
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 2006, Domestication of Media and Technology
- 2017, Using Words and Things: Language and Philosophy of Technology
- 2019, Moved by Machines: Performance Metaphors and Philosophy of Technology
- 1990, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth
- 1993, Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction
- 1998, Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science
- 2019, Alexa does not care. Should you? Media literacy in the age of digital voice assistants, Glimpse, 19, 106
- 2019, Accounting for the moral significance of technology: revisiting the case of non-medical sex selection, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 16, 75, 10.1007/s11673-018-9891-4 · DOI
- 1996, On actor-network theory: a few clarifications, Soziale Welt, 47, 369
- 2014, How do you say ‘hello’? Personality impressions from brief novel voices, Plos One, 9, e90779, 10.1371/journal.pone.0090779 · DOI
- 1999, The Social Shaping of Technology
- 2011, Does social desirability bias favor humans? Explicit–implicit evaluations of synthesized speech support a new HCI model of impression management, Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 402, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.002 · DOI
- 2005, Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship
- 1994, Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces
- 2009, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research
- 2006, Domestication: the enactment of technology, 40
- 2005, What Things Do
- 2011, Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things
- 1986, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology
- 1953, Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Studying Exploration & Long-Term Use of Voice Assistants by Older Adults
Upadhyay, P., Heung, S., Azenkot, S., & Brewer, R. N. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580925 · Cited by 51
“Since most researchers have primarily studied group voice assistant use in home settings with children and parents [2, 14, 17, 18], we encourage future work to explore VA group use in community living.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kudina, O., & Coeckelbergh, M.
- Affiliations
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Venue
- Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-05-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 299-312
- ISSN
- 1477-996X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3161440962
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- resolver.tudelft.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society (publishedVersion)
- Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- voice assistants, smart speakers, technology appropriation, empowerment, meaning-making, household technology, privacy, power and knowledge, moral subject, Wittgenstein's philosophy, human-technology interaction, ethics of technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review