Cited by 23Ethics and Social Impacts of AICybernetics and Technology in SocietyInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Alexa, define empowerment”: voice assistants at home, appropriation and technoperformances

Open access
Kudina, Olya, Coeckelbergh, Mark·2021·Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to show how the production of meaning is a matter of people interacting with technologies, throughout their appropriation and in co-performances. The researchers rely on the case of household-based voice assistants that endorse speaking as a primary mode of interaction with technologies. By analyzing the ethical significance of voice assistants as co-producers of moral meaning intervening in the material and socio-cultural space of the home, the paper invites their informed and critical use as a form of (re-)empowerment while acknowledging their productive role in human values. Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an empirically informed philosophical analysis. Using the conceptual frameworks of technological appropriation and human–technological performances, while drawing on the interviews with voice assistants’ users and literature studies, this paper unravels the meaning-making processes in relation to these technologies in the household use. It additionally draws on a Wittgensteinian perspective to attend to the productive role of language and link to wider cultural meanings. Findings: By combining two approaches, appropriation and technoperformances, and analyzing the themes of privacy, power and knowledge, the paper shows how voice assistants help to shape a specific moral subject: embodied in space and made as it performatively responds to the device and makes sense of it together with others. Originality/value: The researchers show how through making sense of technologies in appropriation and performatively responding to them, people can change and intervene in the power structures that technologies suggest.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jices-06-2020-0072

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most researchers have primarily studied group voice assistant use in home settings with children and parents.

    “Since most researchers have primarily studied group voice assistant use in home settings with children and parents [2,14,17,18], we encourage future work to explore VA group use in community living.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 2006, Domestication of Media and Technology
  2. 2017, Using Words and Things: Language and Philosophy of Technology
  3. 2019, Moved by Machines: Performance Metaphors and Philosophy of Technology
  4. 1990, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth
  5. 1993, Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction
  6. 1998, Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science
  7. 2019, Alexa does not care. Should you? Media literacy in the age of digital voice assistants, Glimpse, 19, 106
  8. 2019, Accounting for the moral significance of technology: revisiting the case of non-medical sex selection, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 16, 75, 10.1007/s11673-018-9891-4 · DOI
  9. 1996, On actor-network theory: a few clarifications, Soziale Welt, 47, 369
  10. 2014, How do you say ‘hello’? Personality impressions from brief novel voices, Plos One, 9, e90779, 10.1371/journal.pone.0090779 · DOI
  11. 1999, The Social Shaping of Technology
  12. 2011, Does social desirability bias favor humans? Explicit–implicit evaluations of synthesized speech support a new HCI model of impression management, Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 402, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.002 · DOI
  13. 2005, Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship
  14. 1994, Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces
  15. 2009, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research
  16. 2006, Domestication: the enactment of technology, 40
  17. 2005, What Things Do
  18. 2011, Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things
  19. 1986, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology
  20. 1953, Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kudina, O., & Coeckelbergh, M.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-05-10
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
299-312
ISSN
1477-996X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3161440962
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
voice assistants, smart speakers, technology appropriation, empowerment, meaning-making, household technology, privacy, power and knowledge, moral subject, Wittgenstein's philosophy, human-technology interaction, ethics of technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review