The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: a bibliometric analysis
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: In 2017, the Journal of Knowledge Management(JKM) celebrates its 20th anniversary. This study aims to show an updated analysis of their publications to provide a general overview of the journal, focusing on a bibliometric analysis of its publications between 1997 and 2016. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology involves two procedures: a performance analysis and a science mapping analysis of JKM. The performance analysis uses a series of bibliometric indicators such as h-index, productivity and citations. This analysis considers different dimensions, including papers, authors, universities and countries. VOSviewer software is used to carry out the mapping of science of JKM, which, based on the concurrence of key words and co-citation points of view, seeks to graphically analyze the structure of the references of this journal. Findings: There is a positive evolution in the number of publications (although with certain oscillations), which shows a growing interest in publishing in JKM. The USA and the UK lead the publications in this journal, although at a regional level, Europe is the most productive. The low participation of emerging economies in JKM is also observed. Practical implications: The paper will identify the leading trends in the journal in terms of papers, authors, institutions, countries, journals and keywords. This study is useful for obtaining a quick snapshot of what is happening in the journal. Originality/value: From the historical record of JKM publications, this study presents an exclusive bibliometric analysis of its publications until 2016 and identifies its main trends.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
The Knowledge-Creating Company
Nonaka, I. (1998) · The Economic Impact of Knowledge · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50016-1 · Cited by 14,619
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5167 · Cited by 10,802
Chen, C. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20317 · Cited by 6,433
Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 · Cited by 5,274
Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics
Pritchard, A. E. (1969) · Journal of Documentation · Cited by 3,298
Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers
Kessler, M. M. (1963) · American Documentation · doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103 · Cited by 2,855
Garfield, E. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471 · Cited by 2,788
Cited by
Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 · Cited by 560
Self-citationMas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., Sarin, S., Haon, C., Sego, T., Belkhouja, M., Porter, A., & Merigó, J. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120487 · Cited by 147
Self-citationData governance & quality management—Innovation and breakthroughs across different fields
Bernardo, B. M. V., Mamede, H. S., Barroso, J. M. P., & dos Santos, V. M. P. D. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100598 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-06-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1655-1687
- ISSN
- 1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2806012053
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 22.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: a bibliometric analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jkm-10-2017-0497
- The paper
- Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018). Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-10-2017-0497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
