Cited by 92AI and HR TechnologiesHuman Resource and Talent ManagementBig Data and Business Intelligence

Human capital analytics: the winding road

Andersen, Morten Kamp·2017·Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the question: human capital analytics (HR analytics) – are we there yet? It will seek to clarify what is meant by “being there yet” and it will argue that the most positive proponents for this field are way too optimistic about the current state and what impact it will have on HR in the short-to-medium term but that the long-term outlook remain positive for the field. Design/methodology/approach This is a viewpoint paper and the conclusions draw upon the author’s experience in the field. Findings It has been widely acknowledged that HR analytics is still a fairly immature field and has not yet reached its full potential. In this viewpoint, the author argues that the most positive proponents for this field are way too optimistic about the current state and what impact it will have on HR in the short-to-medium term but that the long-term outlook remains positive for the field. The author names four main reasons why HR analytics is still in its infancy: maturity, mindset, organization and competencies. Practical implications If these four aspects are addressed, the HR analytics function will be able to contribute much more to HR’s role as a value generator. Originality/value Focusing on these aspects will set HR analytics up for success and will lead to potentially large shareholder value creation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/joepp-03-2017-0024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is difficult for HR departments to have all three elements of high-quality data, analytical capabilities and strategic ability to act.

    “However, it is difficult for HR departments to have all three elements given the low levels of technology, poor data quality, few resources, lack of analytical competencies and a lack of buy-in from senior management (Andersen, 2017).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, M. K.
Corresponding author
Andersen, Morten Kamp
Venue
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2017-06-05
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
133-136
ISSN
2051-6614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2619265048
Cited by
92
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
Keywords
human capital analytics, HR analytics, organizational readiness, competencies, value creation, shareholder value

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review