Creating a compassion system to achieve efficiency and quality in health care delivery
Abstract
Purpose: Health care delivery is experiencing a multi-faceted epidemic of suffering among patients and care providers. Compassion is defined as noticing, feeling and responding to suffering. However, compassion is typically seen as an individual rather than a more systemic response to suffering and cannot match the scale of the problem as a result. The authors develop a model of a compassion system and details its antecedents (leader behaviors and a compassionate human resource (HR) bundle), its climate or the extent that the organization values, supports and rewards expression of compassion and the behaviors and practices through which it is enacted (standardization and customization) and its effects on efficiently reducing suffering and delivering high quality care. Design/methodology/approach: This paper uses a conceptual approach that synthesizes the literature in health services, HR management, organizational behavior and service operations to develop a new conceptual model. Findings: The paper makes three key contributions. First, the authors theorize the central importance of compassion and a collective commitment to compassion (compassion system) to reducing pervasive patient and care provider suffering in health care. Second, the authors develop a model of an organizational compassion system that details its antecedents of leader behaviors and values as well as a compassionate HR bundle. Third, the authors theorize how compassion climate enhances collective employee well-being and increases standardization and customization behaviors that reduce suffering through more efficient and higher quality care, respectively. Originality/value: This paper develops a novel model of how health care organizations can simultaneously achieve efficiency and quality through a compassion system. Specific leader behaviors and practices that enable compassion climate and the processes through which it achieves efficiency and quality are detailed. Future directions for how other service organizations can replicate a compassion system are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inclusiveness increases feelings of equality via reduced status distance, and therefore fosters compassion among employees and between employees and customers.
“Inclusiveness increases feelings of equality via reduced status distance, and therefore foster compassion among employees and between employees and customers (Vogus et al. 2020).”
From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Vogus et al. 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 119 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Vogus, T. J., McClelland, L. E., Lee, Y. S. H., McFadden, K. L., & Hu, X.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Service Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-01-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 560-580
- ISSN
- 1757-5818 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3114599710
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of service management (publishedVersion)
- Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
- Keywords
- health care delivery, patient suffering, leadership behavior, care efficiency, quality of care, employee well-being, service operations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review