Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

When doing good helps doing better: moral licensing of blatant transgressions with ambiguous brand responsibility through CSR

Bruno, Pascal, Ohlwein, Martin·2026·Journal of Product & Brand Management
DOI 10.1108/jpbm-02-2025-5822
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: Despite their practical relevance, limited research has examined transgressions involving ambiguous brand responsibility. This paper aims to investigate how corporate social responsibility (CSR) affects the moral licensing of such transgressions. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected via three between-subjects online experiments (n = 255/185/276) with volunteers from a German Business School. Building on moral licensing, the studies examine both the moral credentials (Studies 1 and 2) and the moral credits (Studies 1 and 3) pathway. The hypotheses were tested using analyses of variance (ANOVAs) and regression-based analyses. Findings: The results indicate that CSR alters the construal of responsibility, reducing direct blame attribution and fostering brand forgiveness. CSR improves ex ante attitude toward the brand, serving as a buffer against reputational damage. However, CSR neither mitigates the emergence of negative moral emotions nor the deterioration of attitude following misconduct. Originality/value: This research extends the literature on brand transgressions by addressing the underexplored role of ambiguous brand responsibility. It details the mechanisms through which CSR influences consumer blame attribution and brand forgiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jpbm-02-2025-5822

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 107

  1. Aaker, 2004, When good brands do bad, Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 1, 10.1086/383419 · DOI
  2. Albrecht, 2017, Perceptions of group versus individual service failures and their effects on customer outcomes, Journal of Service Research, 20, 188, 10.1177/1094670516675416 · DOI
  3. Antonetti, 2018, Identity bias in negative word of mouth following irresponsible corporate behavior: a research model and moderating effects, Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 1005, 10.1007/s10551-016-3095-9 · DOI
  4. Antonetti, 2021, When doing good will not save us: revisiting the buffering effect of CSR following service failures, Psychology & Marketing, 38, 1608, 10.1002/mar.21531 · DOI
  5. Arli, 2017, Investigating the direct and indirect effects of corporate hypocrisy and perceived corporate reputation on consumers’ attitudes toward the company, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 139, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.04.002 · DOI
  6. Arndt, 2022, Collecting samples from online services: how to use screeners to improve data quality, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39, 117, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.05.001 · DOI
  7. Bai, 2023, Do products branded with handwritten scripts suffer more amid product-harm crises?, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32, 379, 10.1108/JPBM-10-2020-3169 · DOI
  8. Baker, 2008, Individual differences in perceptions of service failure and recovery: the role of race and discriminatory bias, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 552, 10.1007/s11747-008-0089-x · DOI
  9. Bayarassou, 2021, “Fight or flight”: coping responses to brand hate, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30, 492, 10.1108/JPBM-08-2019-2519 · DOI
  10. Becchetti, 2012, Corporate social responsibility and shareholder’s value, Journal of Business Research, 65, 1628, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.022 · DOI
  11. Becker-Olsen, 2006, The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior, Journal of Business Research, 59, 46, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001 · DOI
  12. Bentley, 2018, We’re sorry but it’s not our fault: organizational apologies in ambiguous crisis situations, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26, 138, 10.1111/1468-5973.12169 · DOI
  13. Blanken, 2015, A meta-analytic review of moral licensing, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 540, 10.1177/0146167215572134 · DOI
  14. Bradfield, 1999, The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace, Journal of Management, 25, 607, 10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00018-5 · DOI
  15. Brueninghaus, 2025, CSR associations and market value: the moderating role of market competition, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 34, 333, 10.1108/JPBM-01-2023-4315 · DOI
  16. Brunk, 2020, How do consumers reconcile positive and negative CSR-related information to form an ethical brand perception? A mixed method inquiry, Journal of Business Ethics, 161, 443, 10.1007/s10551-018-3973-4 · DOI
  17. Bruno, 2022, The temperature dimension of emotions, European Journal of Marketing, 56, 2172, 10.1108/EJM-04-2020-0237 · DOI
  18. Carrillat, 2025, Can consumers’ altruistic inferences solve the CSR initiative puzzle? A meta-analytic investigation, Journal of Business Ethics, 196, 639, 10.1007/s10551-024-05704-0 · DOI
  19. Carvalho, 2015, Corporate social ‘irresponsibility’: are consumers’ biases in attribution of blame helping companies in product–harm crises involving hybrid products?, Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 651, 10.1007/s10551-014-2258-9 · DOI
  20. Chu, 2020, Consumers’ engagement with corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication in social media: evidence from China and the United States, Journal of Business Research, 110, 260, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.036 · DOI
  21. Comyns, 2018, Corporate reputation and collective crises: a theoretical development using the case of rana plaza, Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 159, 10.1007/s10551-016-3160-4 · DOI
  22. Coombs, 2015, CSR as crisis risk: expanding how we conceptualize the relationship, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20, 144, 10.1108/CCIJ-10-2013-0078 · DOI
  23. Coulter, 2000, The long good-bye: the dissolution of customer-service provider relationships, Psychology and Marketing, 17, 669, 10.1002/1520-6793(200008)17:8<669::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  24. de Vries, 2018, Small but sincere: how firm size and gratitude determine the effectiveness of cause marketing campaigns, Journal of Retailing, 94, 352, 10.1016/j.jretai.2018.08.002 · DOI
  25. Demasi, 2023, When the private and the public self don’t align: the role of discrepant moral identity dimensions in processing inconsistent CSR information, Journal of Business Ethics, 187, 73, 10.1007/s10551-022-05282-z · DOI
  26. Dunfee, 1999, Social contracts and marketing ethics, Journal of Marketing, 63, 14, 10.2307/1251773 · DOI
  27. Dutta, 2011, Effectiveness of corporate responses to brand crises: the role of crisis type and response strategies, Journal of Business Research, 64, 1281, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.01.013 · DOI
  28. Enright, 1998, Exploring Forgiveness, 46, 10.2307/jj.36032636.9 · DOI
  29. Fang, 2007, An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect, Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 97, 10.1086/513050 · DOI
  30. Ferrell, 2019, Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and brand attitudes: an exploratory study, Journal of Business Research, 95, 491, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.039 · DOI
  31. Fetscherin, 2019, Brand forgiveness, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28, 633, 10.1108/JPBM-04-2018-1845 · DOI
  32. Fincham, 2000, The kiss of the porcupines: from attributing responsibility to forgiving, Personal Relationships, 7, 1, 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00001.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. Fincham, 2002, Forgiveness in marriage: the role of relationship quality, attributions, and empathy, Personal Relationships, 9, 27, 10.1111/1475-6811.00002 · DOI
  34. Francioni, 2025, The strength of stance: the impact of brand activism on resistance to negative information, purchasing, and premium paying intents across different types of failures, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 82, 104102, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104102 · DOI
  35. Green, 2008, Third-party forgiveness: (not) forgiving your close other’s betrayer, Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 407, 10.1177/0146167207311534 · DOI
  36. Grégoire, 2010, A comprehensive model of customer direct and indirect revenge: understanding the effects of perceived greed and customer power, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 738, 10.1007/s11747-009-0186-5 · DOI
  37. Grégoire, 2009, When customer love turns into lasting hate: the effects of relationship strength and time on customer revenge and avoidance, Journal of Marketing, 73, 18, 10.1509/jmkg.73.6.18 · DOI
  38. Habib, 2025, The closing-the-gap effect: joint evaluation leads donors to help charities farther from their goal, Journal of Marketing Research, 62, 77, 10.1177/00222437241270225 · DOI
  39. Han, 2025, Breaking CSR skepticism: how virtual streamer disclosure influences consumer purchases in livestreaming, Journal of Business Ethics, 10.1007/s10551-025-06061-2 · DOI
  40. Hang, 2021, Corporate social responsibility in the luxury sector: the role of moral foundations, Psychology & Marketing, 38, 2227, 10.1002/mar.21571 · DOI
  41. Hartmann, 2014, Chain liability in multitier supply chains? Responsibility attributions for unsustainable supplier behavior, Journal of Operations Management, 32, 281, 10.1016/j.jom.2014.01.005 · DOI
  42. Hayes, 2022, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach
  43. He, 2016, Moral identity centrality and cause-related marketing, European Journal of Marketing, 50, 236, 10.1108/EJM-10-2014-0613 · DOI
  44. Holbrook, 1987, Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising, Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 404, 10.1086/209123 · DOI
  45. Huang, 2020, Think versus feel: two dimensions of brand anthropomorphism, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29, 955, 10.1108/JPBM-11-2018-2125 · DOI
  46. Jedicke, 2025, The dynamics of consumer boycott intention: examining the roles of moral reasoning, cognitive dissonance, and self-congruence, Journal of Business Research, 189, 115127, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115127 · DOI
  47. Jeon, 2016, What drives consumer’s responses to brand crisis? The moderating roles of brand associations and brand-customer relationship strength, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25, 550, 10.1108/JPBM-10-2014-0725 · DOI
  48. Kahneman, 2013, Thinking, Fast and Slow
  49. Kashmiri, 2017, Birds of a feather: intra-industry spillover of the target customer data breach and the shielding role of IT, marketing, and CSR, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 208, 10.1007/s11747-016-0486-5 · DOI
  50. Kennedy, 2021, No matter what you do, I still love you: an examination of consumer reaction to brand transgressions, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30, 594, 10.1108/JPBM-07-2019-2450 · DOI
  51. Kim, 2020, How corporate social responsibility (CSR) saves a company: the role of gratitude in buffering vindictive consumer behavior from product failures, Journal of Business Research, 117, 461, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.024 · DOI
  52. Kim, 2023, The effect of institutional CSR on brand advocacy during covid-19: the moderated mediation effect of CSR expectancy and value-driven motivation, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32, 37, 10.1108/JPBM-12-2020-3268 · DOI
  53. Kim, 2025, The impact of corporate social irresponsibility on prosocial consumer behavior, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 53, 394, 10.1007/s11747-024-01021-0 · DOI
  54. Klein, 2004, Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.003 · DOI
  55. Kliamenakis, 2023, Consumers’ moral licensing of firms’ CSR transgressions, Psychology & Marketing, 40, 643, 10.1002/mar.21779 · DOI
  56. Lasarov, 2020, Social moral licensing, Journal of Business Ethics, 165, 45, 10.1007/s10551-018-4083-z · DOI
  57. Laufer, 2006, How should a company respond to a product harm crisis? The role of corporate reputation and consumer-based cues, Business Horizons, 49, 379, 10.1016/j.bushor.2006.01.002 · DOI
  58. Laufer, 2005, The role of severity in consumer attributions of blame, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 17, 33, 10.1300/J046v17n02_03 · DOI
  59. Lee, 2022, Socially stigmatized company’s CSR efforts during the covid-19 pandemic: the effects of CSR fit and perceived motives, Public Relations Review, 48, 102180, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102180 · DOI
  60. Liu, 2020, Too much of a good thing? The boomerang effect of firms’ investments on corporate social responsibility during product recalls, Journal of Management Studies, 57, 1437, 10.1111/joms.12525 · DOI
  61. Lo, 2019, Does consumer-firm affiliation matter? The impact of social distance on consumers’ moral judgments, Psychology & Marketing, 36, 1215, 10.1002/mar.21270 · DOI
  62. Magee, 2022, Understanding worldview beliefs to allay skepticism toward CSR advertising, Journal of Brand Management, 29, 538, 10.1057/s41262-022-00277-7 · DOI
  63. Mantovani, 2017, How motivations for CSR and consumer-brand social distance influence consumers to adopt pro-social behaviour, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36, 156, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.01.009 · DOI
  64. Mantovani, 2018, Effects of brand transgressions on third-party consumers, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36, 306, 10.1108/MIP-11-2017-0276 · DOI
  65. Mazzoli, 2024, Brand transgressions in advertising related to diversity, equity and inclusion: implications for consumer–brand relationships, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 33, 516, 10.1108/JPBM-02-2023-4352 · DOI
  66. Merritt, 2010, Moral self-licensing: when being good frees us to be bad, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 344, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x · DOI
  67. Miller, 2020, CSR reputation and firm performance: a dynamic approach, Journal of Business Ethics, 163, 619, 10.1007/s10551-018-4057-1 · DOI
  68. Morales, 2017, Keeping it real in experimental research—understanding when, where, and how to enhance realism and measure consumer behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 465, 10.1093/jcr/ucx048 · DOI
  69. Nadler, 2015, Stuck in the Middle: the use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires, The Journal of General Psychology, 142, 71, 10.1080/00221309.2014.994590 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Ndone, 2024, From fury to forgiveness: exploring the mediating role of emotions in the relationship between crisis type, corporate social responsibility fit, and organizational outcomes, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32, e12620, 10.1111/1468-5973.12620 · DOI
  71. Nguyen, 2023, CSR-related consumer scepticism: a review of the literature and future research directions, Journal of Business Research, 169, 114294, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114294 · DOI
  72. Nisbett, 1977, The halo effect: evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 250, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Ohlwein, 2022, Same but different - The effect of the unit of measure on the valuation of a unit price, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66, 102896, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102896 · DOI
  74. Pecot, 2025, Why and when do historical brand transgressions matter?, Journal of Business Ethics, 201, 10.1007/s10551-025-05955-5 · DOI
  75. Pizzetti, 2021, Firms talk, suppliers walk: analyzing the locus of greenwashing in the blame game and introducing ‘vicarious greenwashing’, Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 21, 10.1007/s10551-019-04406-2 · DOI
  76. Ramesh, 2019, Consumer’s response to CSR activities: mediating role of brand image and brand attitude, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 377, 10.1002/csr.1689 · DOI
  77. Romani, 2013, Explaining consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: the role of gratitude and altruistic values, Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 193, 10.1007/s10551-012-1337-z · DOI
  78. Rotman, 2018, Lie, cheat, and steal: how harmful brands motivate consumers to act unethically, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28, 353, 10.1002/jcpy.1002 · DOI
  79. Ryoo, 2025, CSR as a buffer or backfire in brand transgressions: a motivated reasoning perspective, European Journal of Marketing, 59, 185, 10.1108/EJM-06-2023-0435 · DOI
  80. Scheidler, 2020, Partners in crime? The impact of consumers’ culpability for corporate social irresponsibility on their boycott attitude, Journal of Business Research, 109, 607, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.043 · DOI
  81. Schmalz, 2012, Brand attachment and consumer emotional response to unethical firm behavior, Psychology & Marketing, 29, 869, 10.1002/mar.20570 · DOI
  82. Schnebelen, 2018, An appraisal framework of the determinants and consequences of brand happiness, Psychology & Marketing, 35, 101, 10.1002/mar.21073 · DOI
  83. Septianto, 2022, Too cute to be bad? Cute brand logo reduces consumer punishment following brand transgressions, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39, 1108, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.12.006 · DOI
  84. Skarmeas, 2013, When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism, Journal of Business Research, 66, 1831, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.004 · DOI
  85. Szőcs, 2025, Price-related consequences of corporate social (ir)responsibility, Journal of Business Research, 186, 114985, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114985 · DOI
  86. Tolunay, 2025, Don’t make me hate you, my love! perceived brand betrayal and the love-becomes-hate phenomenon, Journal of Business Research, 187, 115060, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115060 · DOI
  87. Tran, 2025, Consumers’ responses to moral transgressions in the fashion industry: comparative insights from Western developed and Southeast Asian emerging markets, Journal of Business Ethics, 196, 773, 10.1007/s10551-024-05871-0 · DOI
  88. Trump, 2014, Connected consumers’ responses to negative brand actions: the roles of transgression self-relevance and domain, Journal of Business Research, 67, 1824, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.12.007 · DOI
  89. Valor, 2022, Corporate social irresponsibility and consumer punishment: a systematic review and research agenda, Journal of Business Research, 144, 1218, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.063 · DOI
  90. Vanhamme, 2009, ‘Too good to be true!’ The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity, Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 273, 10.1007/s10551-008-9731-2 · DOI
  91. von Berlepsch, 2024, The importance of corporate reputation for sustainable supply chains: a systematic literature review, bibliometric mapping, and research agenda, Journal of Business Ethics, 189, 9, 10.1007/s10551-022-05268-x · DOI
  92. Wagner, 2020, Deconstructing corporate hypocrisy: a delineation of its behavioral, moral, and attributional facets, Journal of Business Research, 114, 385, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.041 · DOI
  93. Wan, 2011, The role of relationship norms in responses to service failures, Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 260, 10.1086/659039 · DOI
  94. Wang, 2023, Consumers’ attributions in performance- and values-related brand crises, European Journal of Marketing, 57, 3162, 10.1108/EJM-04-2022-0254 · DOI
  95. Wannow, 2024, Is brand activism an emotional affair? The role of moral emotions in consumer responses to brand activism, Journal of Brand Management, 31, 168, 10.1057/s41262-023-00326-9 · DOI
  96. Wei, 2020, The road to consumer forgiveness is paved with money or apology? The roles of empathy and power in service recovery, Journal of Business Research, 118, 321, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.061 · DOI
  97. Weiner, 1985, An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion, Psychological Review, 92, 548, 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Weiner, 2000, Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective, Educational Psychology Review, 12, 1, 10.1023/A:1009017532121 · DOI
  99. Weiner, 1991, The goals of excuses and communication strategies related to causal perceptions, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 4, 10.1177/0146167291171002 · DOI
  100. Whitler, 2021, Exogenous brand crises: brand infection and contamination, Marketing Letters, 32, 129, 10.1007/s11002-020-09554-4 · DOI
  101. Xie, 2022, Promoting corporate social responsibility message in covid-19 advertising: how threat persuasion affects consumer responses to altruistic versus strategic CSR, Journal of Business Research, 148, 315, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.073 · DOI
  102. Xie, 2016, Taming the blame game: using promotion programs to counter product-harm crises, Journal of Advertising, 45, 211, 10.1080/00913367.2015.1134362 · DOI
  103. Xie, 2009, How to repair customer trust after negative publicity: the roles of competence, integrity, benevolence, and forgiveness, Psychology & Marketing, 26, 572, 10.1002/mar.20289 · DOI
  104. Xie, 2015, The role of moral emotions and individual differences in consumer responses to corporate green and non-green actions, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 333, 10.1007/s11747-014-0394-5 · DOI
  105. Yoruk, 2025, Consumer forgiveness: a literature review and research agenda, Psychology & Marketing, 42, 554, 10.1002/mar.22138 · DOI
  106. Zhang, 2021, Love becomes hate? or love is blind? Moderating effects of brand love upon consumers’ retaliation towards brand failure, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30, 415, 10.1108/JPBM-07-2019-2470 · DOI
  107. Zhang, 2023, Buffering or aggravating effect? Examining the effects of prior corporate social responsibility on corporate social irresponsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, 183, 147, 10.1007/s10551-022-05036-x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Bruno, P., & Ohlwein, M.
Venue
Journal of Product & Brand Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2025-12-22
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
514-531
ISSN
  • 1061-0421
  • 2054-1643
DOI
10.1108/jpbm-02-2025-5822
Cited by
2
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When doing good helps doing better: moral licensing of blatant transgressions with ambiguous brand responsibility through CSR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jpbm-02-2025-5822
The paper
Bruno, P., & Ohlwein, M. (2026). When doing good helps doing better: moral licensing of blatant transgressions with ambiguous brand responsibility through CSR. Journal of Product & Brand Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-02-2025-5822

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.