CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Observation Moderates the Moral Licensing Effect: A Meta-Analytic Test of Interpersonal and Intrapsychic Mechanisms

Rotella, Amanda, Jung, Jisoo, Chinn, Christopher, Barclay, Pat·2026·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/01461672251345512
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Moral licensing occurs when someone who initially behaves morally subsequently acts less morally. We apply reputation-based theories to predict when and why it occurs. As pre-registered, we predicted: (1) being observed would be associated with larger licensing effects and (2) unambiguous outcomes would have smaller licensing effects. In a multi-level meta-analysis of 115 experiments ( N = 21,770), moral licensing was stronger when participants were observed ( g = 0.65) than unobserved ( g = 0.13). After accounting for publication bias with robust Bayesian meta-analysis, there was moderate evidence for licensing when participants were observed ( g = 0.51; BF 10 = 9.14), but moderate evidence against licensing when unobserved (Hedge’s g = −0.01; BF 10 = 0.11). Ambiguity did not moderate moral licensing. These findings suggest that moral licensing is elicited through interpersonal motives, clarify when licensing (vs. consistency) occurs, and explain why many online studies failed to replicate. Evidence for intrapsychic motives is inconclusive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672251345512

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Bahník Š. Vranka M. (2022). No evidence of moral licensing in a laboratory bribe-taking task. Scientific Reports 12(1) 13860. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16800-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barclay P. (2013). Strategies for cooperation in biological markets especially for humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 34(3) 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.02.002 · DOI
  3. Barclay P. (2016). Biological markets and the effects of partner choice on cooperation and friendship. Current Opinion in Psychology 7 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.012 · DOI
  4. Barclay P. Barker J. (2020). Greener Than Thou: People who protect the environment are more cooperative compete to be environmental and benefit from reputation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 72 101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101441 · DOI
  5. Barclay P. Willer R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274(1610) 749–753. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0209 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bartoš F. Maier M. Quintana D. S. Wagenmakers E.-J. (2022). Adjusting for publication bias in JASP and R: Selection models PET-PEESE and robust Bayesian meta-analysis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 5(3) 251524592211092. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221109259 · DOI
  7. Blanken I. vande Ven N. Zeelenberg M. (2015). A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41(4) 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215572134 · DOI
  8. Blanken I. vande Ven N. Zeelenberg M. Meijers M. H. C. (2014). Three attempts to replicate the moral licensing effect. Social Psychology 45(3) 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000189 · DOI
  9. Boyd K. E. (2014). The effects of moral licensing on high-cost and low-cost helping behaviors. [Honours Thesis, University of Dayton]. University of Dayton eCommons
  10. Conway P. Peetz J. (2012). When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(7) 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212442394 · DOI
  11. Dhaliwal N. A. Martin J. W. Barclay P. Young L. L. (2022). Signaling benefits of partner choice decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 151(6) 1446–1472. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001137 · DOI
  12. Effron D. A. (2014). Making mountains of morality from molehills of virtue: Threat causes people to overestimate their moral credentials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40(8) 972–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214533131 · DOI
  13. Effron D. A. Cameron J. S. Monin B. (2009). Endorsing Obama licenses favoring Whites. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(3) 590–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.001 · DOI
  14. Ferguson R. Kaufmann L. Brown A. De Piedad La Garcia X. (2024). Influences of past moral behavior on future behavior: A review of sequential moral behavior studies using meta-analytic techniques. Psychological Bulletin 150(6) 694–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000441 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Geng L. Cheng X. Tang Z. Zhou K. Ye L. (2016). Can previous pro-environmental behaviours influence subsequent environmental behaviours? The licensing effect of pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology 10 e9. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2016.6 · DOI
  16. Graham J. Haidt J. Koleva S. Motyl M. Iyer R. Wojcik S. P. Ditto P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory. In P. Devine A. Plant (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47 pp. 55–130). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4 · DOI
  17. Hofmann W. Wisneski D. C. Brandt M. J. Skitka L. J. (2014). Morality in everyday life. Science 345(6202) 1340–1343. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251560 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Jordan J. Mullen E. Murnighan J. K. (2011). Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37(5) 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211400208 · DOI
  19. Judd N. Aristodemou M. Klingberg T. Kievit R. (2024). Interindividual differences in cognitive variability are ubiquitous and distinct from mean performance in a battery of eleven tasks. Journal of Cognition 7(1) 45. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.371 · DOI
  20. Kuper N. Bott A. (2019). Has the evidence for moral licensing been inflated by publication bias? Meta-Psychology. 3 MP.2018.878. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.878 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lalot F. Falomir-Pichastor J. M. Quiamzade A. (2018). Compensation and consistency effects in proenvironmental behaviour: The moderating role of majority and minority support for proenvironmental values. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 21(3) 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217733117 · DOI
  22. Lasarov W. Hoffmann S. (2020). Social moral licensing. Journal of Business Ethics 165(1) 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4083-z · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Leary M. R. Raimi K. T. Jongman-Sereno K. P. Diebels K. J. (2015). Distinguishing intrapsychic from interpersonal motives in psychological theory and research. Perspectives on Psychological Science 10(4) 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615583132 · DOI
  25. Lipsey M. W., Wilson D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE publications, Inc.
  26. Mazar N. Zhong C.-B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science 21(4) 494–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363538 · DOI
  27. Meijers M. H. C. Verlegh P. W. J. Noordewier M. K. Smit E. G. (2015). The dark side of donating: How donating may license environmentally unfriendly behavior. Social Influence 10(4) 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2015.1092468 · DOI
  28. Merritt A. C. Effron D. A. Monin B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: when being good frees us to be bad: moral self-licensing. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4(5) 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x · DOI
  29. Miller D. T. Effron D. A. (2010). Psychological license. In M. P. Zanna J. M. Olson (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43 pp. 115–155). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43003-8 · DOI
  30. Moher D. Liberati A. Tetzlaff J. Altman D. G. and the PRISMA Group. (2009). Reprint—Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Physical Therapy 89(9) 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/89.9.873 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Mullen E. Monin B. (2016). Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology 67(1) 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115120 · DOI
  32. Polman E. Lu Z. Y. (2022). Are people more selfish after giving gifts? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 35(2) e2252. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2252 · DOI
  33. Polman E. Pettit N. C. Wiesenfeld B. M. (2013). Effects of wrongdoer status on moral licensing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(4) 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.012 · DOI
  34. Rotella A. Barclay P. (2020). Failure to replicate moral licensing and moral cleansing in an online experiment. Personality and Individual Differences 161 109967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109967 · DOI
  35. Rotella A. Fogg C. Mishra S. Barclay P. (2019). Measuring delay discounting in a crowdsourced sample: An exploratory study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 60(6) 520–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12583 · DOI
  36. Sachdeva S. Iliev R. Medin D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science 20(4) 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x · DOI
  37. Shrout P. E. Rodgers J. L. (2018). Psychology science and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology 69(1) 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845 · DOI
  38. Simbrunner P. Schlegelmilch B. B. (2017). Moral licensing: A culture-moderated meta-analysis. Management Review Quarterly 67(4) 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0128-0 · DOI
  39. Susewind M. Hoelzl E. (2014). A matter of perspective: Why past moral behavior can sometimes encourage and other times discourage future moral striving: A matter of perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 44(3) 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12214 · DOI
  40. Team R. C. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria.
  41. Tiefenbeck V. Staake T. Roth K. Sachs O. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy 57 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.021 · DOI
  42. Urban J. Bahník Š. Kohlová M. B. (2019). Green consumption does not make people cheat: Three attempts to replicate moral licensing effect due to pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 63 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.011 · DOI
  43. Viechtbauer W. (2010). Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. Journal of Statistical Software 36(3) 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Rotella, A., Jung, J., Chinn, C., & Barclay, P.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2025-07-08
Volume
52
Issue
9
Pages
2792-2808
ISSN
  • 0146-1672
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/01461672251345512
Cited by
3
References
9
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430287, 752-2015-1328)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review