Cited by 298Digital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Understanding the relationships between social media influencers and their followers: the moderating role of closeness

Taillon, Brian J., Mueller, Steven M., Kowalczyk, Christine M., Jones, Daniel N.·2020·Journal of Product & Brand Management

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to better understand the role of closeness and the relationships between social media influencers and their followers, and, more specifically, how social media influencers can effectively manage their human brands. Design/methodology/approach Two studies were conducted to explore social media influencers. Qualitative content analysis and modeling with path analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings Results found attractiveness and likeability to positively predict attitudes toward the influencer, word-of-mouth and purchase intentions, whereas similarity only predicted word-of-mouth from the follower. Closeness served as a moderator but had different effects. Closeness positively moderated the effect of attractiveness on purchase intentions; however, it had a negative effect with similarity on purchase intentions. Moreover, closeness moderated the effect of likeability on attitude toward the influencer. Research limitations/implications This study was limited by the student sample as well as the students’ self-identification of a social media influencer. Future research should include experimental design manipulating well-known/followed or fictional social media influencers on different social media. Practical implications This paper explores the characteristics of social media influencers as well as the potential outcomes associated with influencers on social media. The implications for marketers and advertisers include a better understanding of how consumers engage with influencers on social media. Originality/value The role of closeness is identified as a moderator of consumers’ behaviors toward social media influencers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jpbm-03-2019-2292

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taillon, B. J., Mueller, S. M., Kowalczyk, C. M., & Jones, D. N.
Affiliations
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Venue
Journal of Product & Brand Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-06-27
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
767-782
ISSN
1061-0421 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037286191
Cited by
298
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
47.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Product & Brand Management (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Longwood (Longwood University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
social media influencers, influencer-follower relationships, closeness, attractiveness, likeability, similarity, word of mouth, purchase intention, consumer behavior, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review