The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Celebrity endorsement, self-brand connection and consumer-based brand equity
Abstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of celebrity endorser credibility on consumer self-brand connection and endorsed brand equity. A conceptual model is developed, positioning consumer self-brand connections as a partial mediator of the effect of endorser credibility on endorsed brand equity. Design/methodology/approach: – A cross-sectional survey of 382 consumers of sports drinks in the USA was conducted to estimate the conceptual model. Stimuli, devised on the basis of a pre-test, involved celebrity–brand pairings in the context of the US non-aseptic sports drinks industry. Structural equation modeling is used as the analytic tool. Findings: – The research model is empirically supported. Celebrity endorsements impact endorsed brand equity via two pathways. First, a direct effect of endorser credibility on endorsed brand equity was observed, which is positively moderated by the degree of consumer-perceived endorser–brand congruence. Second, self-brand connection partly mediates the effect of endorser credibility on endorsed brand equity, supporting an indirect mechanism of brand equity enhancement. Practical implications: – Managers can now consider using celebrities as tools to develop meaningful self-concept-related connections with consumers. Additionally, the results of this study support for the use of celebrity endorsers as direct brand equity-enhancing tools. Originality/value: – This study is among pioneering investigations that examine the self-concept repercussions of celebrity endorsements, suggesting that celebrity endorsers possess the ability to engage with consumers at the self-concept level, in turn, impacting endorsed brand equity. Additionally, this paper examines the direct and indirect mechanisms by which celebrities influence consumer-based brand equity of the endorsed brand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822 · cited 1×
“Peripheral cues such as celebrity endorsers may play a larger role than in shopping or specialty products where consumer involvement is likely higher and where consumers are likely to rely on a more central, cognitive elaboration (Cacioppo and Petty, 1984).”
BackgroundOhanian, R. (1990) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191 · Cited by 4,043
On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19 · Cited by 3,538 · cited 1×
“However, we decided against using the dichotomization approach as it purportedly leads to loss of information that leads to spurious results and is strongly discouraged (MacCallum et al., 2002).”
MethodThe Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Communication and Persuasion · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1 · Cited by 3,202
Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007 · Cited by 906 · cited 2×
“the number of observed variables) and the sample size on fit indices (Sharma et al., 2005), the fit indices elicited in our measurement model do not seem to indicate an unsatisfactory fit to data (Sharma et al.”
BackgroundResultSprott, D., Czellar, S., & Spangenberg, E. (2009) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.1.92 · Cited by 850
Cited by
Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501 · Cited by 2,795
Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514 · Cited by 543
Leite, F. P., & Baptista, P. D. P. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2021.1935275 · Cited by 244
Meng, L. (., Bie, Y., Yang, M., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104978 · Cited by 123
Mediating model of brand equity and its application
Raut, U. R., Pawar, P. A., Brito, P. Q., & Sisodia, G. S. (2019) · Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC · doi:10.1108/sjme-04-2019-0021 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Dwivedi, A., Johnson, L. W., & McDonald, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Product & Brand Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-08-17
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 449-461
- ISSN
- 1061-0421 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1732972468
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 27.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Celebrity endorsement, self-brand connection and consumer-based brand equity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jpbm-10-2014-0722
- The paper
- Dwivedi, A., Johnson, L. W., & McDonald, R. E. (2015). Celebrity endorsement, self-brand connection and consumer-based brand equity. Journal of Product & Brand Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-10-2014-0722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.