The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adoption of digital payment systems in the era of demonetization in India: An empirical study
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the actual usage (AU) of digital payment systems by the consumers during the period of demonetization (from November 9, 2016 to December 30, 2016) in India. Design/methodology/approach: The conceptual frame work for this study is based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT 2) and innovation resistance theory. A total of 766 sample respondents were surveyed using a pre-tested questionnaire. The empirical validation of the framework and analysis was done using partial least squares (PLS)-structural equation modeling (SEM) technique. Findings: The results suggest that the behavioral intention (BI) to use and innovation resistance (IR) affect the usage of digital payment systems. The relation between BI to use digital payment systems and the AU of digital payment systems is moderated by the stickiness to cash payments. Research limitations/implications: This cross-sectional study is limited by geographic constraints and highlights the AU of digital payment systems by using the UTAUT 2 and IR theory only during the demonetization period. Practical implications: This study offers valuable insights to the economists, policymakers and digital payment service providers regarding the usage of digital payment systems by consumers during demonetization. Originality/value: This study assumes importance as it empirically examines the influence of BI and IR on the AU of digital payment systems during the demonetization period in India. This study empirically validates the moderating influence of stickiness to cash payments on the AU of digital payment systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202 · Cited by 21,631
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 2013, Adoption of internet banking by Yemeni consumers: an empirical investigation, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7, 182
- 1991, The depersonalization of retailing: its impact on the lonely consumer, Journal of Retailing, 67, 226
- Garcia, R. and Atkin, T. (2002), “Coopetition for the diffusion of resistant innovations: a case study in the global wine industry”, Institute for Global Innovation Management Working Paper, 05-002, pp. 1-22.
- 2006, Multivariate Data Analysis
- 2004, Time and Location as Customer Perceived Value Drivers
- 1992, Customer acceptance: the key to successful introductions of innovations, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 10, 4, 10.1108/02634509210007812 · doi:10.1108/02634509210007812
- 2000, Web portals usher in, drive away business, National Underwrite, 104
- 2002, Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Consumers
- 1978, Psychometric Theory
- 1989, Successful innovation using strategies to reduce consumer resistance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 6, 20, 10.1111/1540-5885.610020 · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.610020
- 1995, Diffusion of Innovations
- 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
- 1981, Psychology of innovation resistance: the less developed concept (LDC), in diffusion research, Research in Marketing, 4, 273
- 2010, A conceptual framework on mobile commerce acceptance and usage a Mong Malaysian consumers: the influence of location, privacy, trust and purchasing power, WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 5, 661
- 2014, A cross-cultural examination of the impact of social, organisational and individual factors on educational technology acceptance between British and Lebanese university students, British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 739
Cited by
Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism
Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B. (2020) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-04-2020-0259 · Cited by 986
Self-citationPatil, P., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Raghavan, V. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144 · Cited by 820
Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Ooi, K.-B., & Wei, J. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102047 · Cited by 528
An innovation resistance theory perspective on mobile payment solutions
Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Singh, N., Sahu, G., & Almotairi, M. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102059 · Cited by 487
Adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) for talent acquisition in IT/ITeS organizations
Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B. (2020) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-04-2020-0186 · Cited by 422
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sivathanu, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-03-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-171
- ISSN
- 2053-4620 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2781560887
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 23.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adoption of digital payment systems in the era of demonetization in India: An empirical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jstpm-07-2017-0033
- The paper
- Sivathanu, B. (2019). Adoption of digital payment systems in the era of demonetization in India: An empirical study. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-07-2017-0033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
